ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an...

37

Transcript of ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an...

Page 1: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 2: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 3: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 4: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 5: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 6: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 7: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 8: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 9: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 10: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 11: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 12: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 13: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 14: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 15: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 16: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 17: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 18: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 19: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 20: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 21: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 22: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 23: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 24: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 25: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 26: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 27: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 28: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 29: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 30: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 31: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 32: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 33: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 34: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 35: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 36: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.
Page 37: ScanJob - LAWPHiL · 2018. 6. 25. · construction; and that, insread, petitioner resorted to an interpretation that was not only self-serving but aiso devoid of basis and reason.