RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin...

39
May 2007 RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER TYPOLOGIES HARMONISATION OF DRB TYPOLOGIES

Transcript of RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin...

Page 1: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

May 2007

RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS:

RIVER TYPOLOGIES

HARMONISATION OF DRB TYPOLOGIES

Page 2: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

AUTHORS

PREPARED BY:

umweltbüro essen Bolle und Partner GbR

AUTHORS:

Tanja Pottgiesser

Sebastian Birk (University of Duisburg-Essen)

umweltbüro essen Bolle & Partner GbR

Rellinghauser Str. 334 F

45136 Essen, Germany

Page 3: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB Typologies

page 3

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................7 2. Brief overview of national stream typologies ...........................................................8

2.1. Ecoregions .....................................................................................................9 2.2. Stream types................................................................................................ 10

3. Methodology and base data ................................................................................ 11 3.1. Basic considerations ...................................................................................... 11 3.2. Steps of works.............................................................................................. 11

4. “Table of harmonisation” – comparative tables of national stream types in the DRBD.. 13 5. Discussion ....................................................................................................... 21

LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Overview of typology data delivered by individual countries ......................................8 Table 2 Ecoregions in the Danube River Basin ....................................................................9 Table 3 Additional parameters used in.............................................................................10 Table 4 Overview of the number of national and harmonised DRB types...............................13 Table 5 Synopsis of national stream types in the Danube River Basin, sorted by ecoregion. ....14

LIST OF ANNEXES ANNEX 1 List of rivers selected for the basin-wide overview of the DRB - Basis of the “Table of Harmonisation”............................................................................................................ 25 ANNEX 2 Overview of national descriptions of stream types at relevant rivers, sorted by ecoregion ................................................................................................................... 28

Page 4: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

page 4

UMWELTBÜRO ESSEN / T. POTTGIESSER & S. BIRK

ABBREVIATIONS

DRB Danube River Basin

DRBD Danube River Basin District

EU WFD EU Water Framework Directive

sil siliceous

cal calcareous

org organic

tq Sed tertiary and quaternary sediments

Page 5: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies

page 5

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (EU WFD). The development of the typology systems as well as the attribution of water courses to stream types followed the national needs within the scope of interpreting the EU WFD specifications.

In order to prepare a stream type map of an international river basin, a synopsis of all relevant national stream types is in demand. The high number of national types requires harmonisation efforts to reduce the total number of stream types. Similar types defined by several countries need to be identified and duplicate denominations have to be deleted. Harmonisation of national stream typologies also plays an essential role in analogous mapping of the DRBD.

In this study stream types at rivers of the DRBD with catchment areas >4,000 km2 were considered. The harmonisation of 159 national stream types resulted in a total number of 72 international stream types.

Due to missing data the ecoregions 6 Hellenic Western Balkan and 7 Eastern Balkan could not be integrated in the analysis.

In summary, the particular ecoregions cover: Alps – 14 types, Dinaric Western Balkan - 7 types, Central Highlands – 9 types, The Carpathians - 12 types, Hungarian Lowlands - 13 types, Pontic Province - 10 types und Eastern Plains - 5 types. Furthermore, 2 stream types were specified as “ecoregion independent types” that can occur in different ecoregions (“azonal types”).

In Ecoregion 11 Hungarian Lowlands the harmonisation of stream types reduced the number of types by one-third. Number of types in ecoregions 4 Alps, 5 Dinaric Western Balkan und 10 The Carpathians were approximately halved.

Page 6: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 7: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies

page 7

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

1. INTRODUCTION

In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (EU WFD). The development of the typology systems as well as the attribution of water courses to stream types followed the national needs within the scope of interpreting the EU WFD specifications.

In order to prepare a stream type map of an international river basin, a synopsis of all relevant national stream types is in demand. The high number of national types requires harmonisation efforts to reduce the total number of stream types. Similar types defined by several countries need to be identified and duplicate denominations have to be deleted. Harmonisation of national stream typologies also plays an essential role in analogous mapping of the DRBD.

Hence, a table of the national stream types is to be prepared as a synopsis of the national typology systems, called “Table of Harmonisation”.

The “Table of Harmonisation”

− sets fundamentals for a basin-wide stream type map,

− creates common basis for communication,

− facilitates transboundary monitoring issues,

− defines common types as basis for intercalibration.

The “Table of Harmonisation” covers all stream types at rivers in the Danube River Basin with >4,000 km2 catchment area. This also includes stream types <4,000 km2 located at the upstream courses of these rivers. The Danube river and its section types are not considered in this study.

Data on the latest versions of the national typologies were collected and analysed with regard to commonalities and differences. Most relevant for the typology comparison were the obligatory parameters of the system A of the WFD (ecoregion, size, altitude, geology) and several optional parameters of the system B, that were used in a comparable way in the national typology systems e.g. sub-ecoregions and mean substrate.

Page 8: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Brief overview of national stream typologies

page 8

2. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL STREAM TYPOLOGIES

For the harmonisation of national stream types at relevant rivers 13 countries provided most recent information about stream typologies and descriptions of individual stream types (see Table 1).

Data from Ukraine only covered the Tisza river. Moldavian information was confined to descriptions of national types at the Prut river.

Table 1 Overview of typology data delivered by individual countries

Country System A parameter System B parameter and

further information

Germany x x

Austria x x

Czech Republic x x

Slovakia x x

Hungary x x

Croatia x x

Slovenia x x

Bosnia i Herzegovina x x

Serbia and Montenegro** x x

Romania x x

Bulgaria x x

Moldova* x x

Ukraine* x x

* incomplete information

** no information about ecoregions (see chapter 2.1)

Page 9: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies

page 9

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

2.1. ECOREGIONS

The Danube River Basin District covers nine ecoregions or parts thereof (see Table 2). Some countries have shares of several ecoregions, e.g. Austria and Serbia and Montenegro have parts of five ecoregions on its territory in the DRBD. Ecoregion 11 (Hungarian Lowlands) has an importance due to its location in the middle of the basin. Nine DRB countries have territories in this ecoregion (see Table 2).

Table 2 Ecoregions in the Danube River Basin

Ecoregion Countries with territories in the DRB

4 – Alps Germany, Austria, Slovenia, Italy, Switzerland

5 – Dinaric Western Balkan Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Albania

6 – Hellenic Western Balkan Serbia and Montenegro, Albania, Macedonia

7 – Eastern Balkan Serbia and Montenegro, Macedonia

9 – Central Highlands Germany, Austria, Czech Republic

10 – The Carpathians Austria, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Poland, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania

11 – Hungarian Lowlands Austria, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Hungary, Croatia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania

12 – Pontic Province Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine

16 – Eastern Plains Romania, Moldova, Ukraine

All national typology included ecoregional data to delineate stream types except for Serbia and Montenegro. According to statements of national experts (M. Paunovic, email notice), the scale on which ecoregion borders are generally defined is too large. In Serbia more precise maps are required to include information on ecoregions in the national stream typology.

Page 10: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Brief overview of national stream typologies

page 10

2.2. STREAM TYPES

All countries in the Danube River Basin District applied System B according to Annex II of the EU WFD. Besides System A parameters (altitude, catchment size, geology) additional information about climatic, hydrological, morphological or biocoenotic characteristics was available (see Table 3). These data partly covered typological factors of System B.

Countries adopted class boundaries of System A parameters following national requirements: For instance, Austria and Slovak Republic included an additional altitude class for watercourses higher than 1500 metres. Hungary established overlapping class boundaries of catchment area in order to account for continuous changes in nature that do not stop at fixed borders. Serbia and Montenegro defined an additional catchment area boundary at 4000 km²; Slovenia at 2500 km². Slovak Republic and Bulgaria introduced the class of “mixed” geology.

Table 3 Additional parameters used in national stream typologies

Parameter Countries

Mean water slope Germany, Slovakia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Romania, Moldova

Mean substratum composition Germany, Hungary, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine

River discharge Slovakia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Valley shape Germany, Czech Republic, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Channel form Germany, Slovakia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Hydrology / water flow Germany, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Moldova

Saprobiological Basic Condition Germany, Austria

Precipitation [mm p.a.] Romania

Temperature [°C] Romania

Fish Zonation Romania

Most of the countries used data on mean substratum composition, mean water slope or valley shape to characterise their national stream types more precisely. Croatia classified the mean annual river flow [m3/s] in its national typology. Slovenia added information about lake outflow influence and linmocrene spring influence to the parameter “hydrology/water flow”. The Romanian river types were defined regarding precipitation [mm p.a.] and temperature [°C] amongst other parameters.

Page 11: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies

page 11

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

3. METHODOLOGY AND BASE DATA

3.1. BASIC CONSIDERATIONS

− Objective: Harmonisation of all river types of the Danube River Basin located at rivers with >4,000 km2 catchment area excluding the Danube River (see Annex 1)

− Descriptions of stream types differed among countries and available data on national typologies was heterogeneous. Therefore, only System A parameters (ecoregion, altitude, catchment area, geology) and respective parameter classes according to Annex II of the EU WFD as the “least common denominator” were used in the harmonisation exercise.

− In a first step, stream types were aggregated according to ecoregion, followed by altitude, catchment size and geology.

− Stream types of Serbia and Montenegro could not be assigned to ecoregions and thus were not considered in the harmonisation.

− If parameter values of System A corresponded among national types, these types were merged. Therefore, Austrian types of various saprobiological basic conditions or Hungarian types with different channel substrate were subsumed. Although altitude was further divided within several national typologies, altitude classes of System A were used in the harmonisation. Stream types covering different hydrological regimes were also aggregated, e.g. for the Bulgarian typology.

3.2. STEPS OF WORK

To develop a “Table of Harmonisation” for the stream types in the Danube River Basin the following steps were performed:

1. Request for updating information on types of rivers relevant in the basin wide overview

To ask for data about the latest version of national typologies, a template was established and circulated. Countries were requested to note down as much additional information as possible - also available data on types that were not used to officially describe the types (For example, information on channel form is not used as a System B parameter in Germany. But to establish the national typology, information about that parameter was very useful).

Requested general information, obligatory factors of System A and further optional factors of System B were:

− Code/abbreviation of stream type (with country code)

− Name of stream type (English)

− Name of stream type (national)

− Ecoregion

− Altitude

− Catchment size

− Geology (dominant type)

− Sub-ecoregion/bioregion

Page 12: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Methodology and base data

page 12

− Mean water slope

− Mean substratum composition (megalithal >40 cm; macrolithal 20 to 40 cm; mesolithal 6 to 20 cm; microlithal 2 to 6cm; akal 0.2 to 2 cm; sand and mud; silt, loam and clay)

− River discharge (e.g. <10 l/s; 10 to 300 l/s; 300 to 1,000 l/s; 1,000 to 10,000 l/s; >10,000 l/s)

− Valley shape (canyon; V-shaped valley; meander valley; U-shaped valley; trough; plain floodplain)

− Channel form (meandering; braided; anabranching; sinuate; ...)

− Hydrology / water flow (permanent, temporary, backwater, lake outflow influence, limnocrene springs influence…)

− Other parameters

2. Preparation of an overview of all national stream types of the Danube River Basin

including type specific descriptions (national code, name, ecoregion, altitude, catchment area, geology, mean substrate composition etc.) (see Annex 2)

3. Selection of data relevant for the “Table of Harmonisation“

Data analysis including selection and validation of criteria for the aggregation of national types: Since descriptions of stream types differed among countries and available data on national typologies was heterogeneous, only System A parameters (ecoregion, altitude, catchment area, geology) and respective parameter classes according to Annex II of the EU WFD as the “least common denominator” were used in the harmonisation exercise.

4. Merging of national stream types within the same ecoregion based on descriptions of the abiotic conditions = Compilation of "Table of Harmonisation" for all national types in the DRB

5. Design of a new trans-national stream type code for the DRB

For the harmonised stream types a “Danube River Basin type code“ has been developed. The Code is composed of a number combination, e.g. 10001)_122)_33): 1) 1000: for all stream types in the Danube River Basin according to the „RiverBasinDistrictCode“ of the WFD-Code list 2) number of the ecoregion; “99” was assigned to the “ecosystem independent types“ 3) consecutive number

Page 13: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies

page 13

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

4. “TABLE OF HARMONISATION” – COMPARATIVE TABLES OF NATIONAL STREAM TYPES IN THE DRBD

Within the harmonisation exercise the total number of 159 national stream types at rivers of the DRBD with catchment areas >4,000 km2 were combined to 72 harmonised DRB-types (see Table 5). In Table 5 the aggregated stream types are marked by a blue frame.

Due to missing data the ecoregions 6 Hellenic Western Balkan and 7 Eastern Balkan could not be integrated in the analysis.

In summary, the particular ecoregions cover: Alps – 14 types, Dinaric Western Balkan - 7 types, Central Highlands – 9 types, The Carpathians - 12 types, Hungarian Lowlands - 13 types, Pontic Province - 10 types und Eastern Plains - 5 types (see Table 4). Furthermore, 2 stream types were specified as “ecoregion independent types” that can occur in different ecoregions (“azonal types”).

In Ecoregion 11 Hungarian Lowlands the harmonisation of stream types reduced the number of types by one-third. Number of types in ecoregions 4 Alps, 5 Dinaric Western Balkan und 10 The Carpathians was more than halved.

Table 4 Overview of the number of national and harmonised DRB types

Ecoregion Countries with types at relevant rivers

No. of national

types

No. of harmonised

types

4 Alps Germany, Austria, Slovenia 32 14

5 Dinaric Western Balkan Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro**

20 7

6 Hellenic Western Balkan Serbia and Montenegro** -- --

7 Eastern Balkan Serbia and Montenegro** -- --

9 Central Highlands Germany, Austria, Czech Republic 17 9

10 The Carpathians Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Serbia and Montenegro**, Romania

25 12

11 Hungarian Lowlands Austria, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, Bosnia i Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro**, Ukraine*, Romania

42 13

12 Pontic Province Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova*, Ukraine* 14 10

16 Eastern Plains Romania, Moldova*, Ukraine* 7 5

Ecoregion independent Germany, Romania 2 2

* incomplete information

** no information about ecoregions

Page 14: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

“Table of harmonisation” - comparative tables of national stream types in the DRBD

page 14

Table 5 Synopsis of national stream types in the Danube River Basin, sorted by ecoregion. Types aggregated to a DRB-type are marked by a blue frame.

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

DE

Type

1.1

: Sm

all a

lpin

e st

ream

s 8

00 m

10-1

00 k

calc

areo

us

1000

_4_6

AT

UZA

_Typ

e c-

1,50

: Non

-gla

ciat

ed C

ryst

allin

e Al

ps80

0-1,

600

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

1000

_4_1

1AT

UZA

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Non

-gla

ciat

ed C

ryst

allin

e Al

ps50

0-80

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

AT

KH_T

ype

b-1,

25: L

imes

tone

Alp

s80

0-1,

600

m10

-100

km

²ca

lcar

eous

1000

_4_7

SI

SI_4

_KB

-AL-

D_1

_KI:

Smal

l riv

ers

of C

arbo

nate

Alp

s-D

anub

e riv

er b

asin

with

a k

arst

spr

ing

influ

ence

>400

m10

-100

km

²l

AT

KV_

Type

d-1

,75:

Lim

esto

ne F

ooth

ills20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²ca

lcar

eous

AT

KH_T

ype

b-1,

25: L

imes

tone

Alp

s>1

,600

m10

-100

km

²ca

lcar

eous

AT

BR_t

ype

c-1,

50: R

idge

s an

d Fo

othi

lls o

f the

Cry

stal

line

Alps

200-

500

m10

-100

km

² si

liceo

us

AT

KV_

Type

d-1

,75:

Lim

esto

ne F

ooth

ills50

0-80

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²ca

lcar

eous

SI

SI_4

_KB

-AL-

D_1

_LI:

Sm

all r

iver

s of

Car

bona

te A

lps-

Dan

ube

river

bas

in w

ith a

lim

nocr

ene

sprin

g in

fluen

ce>8

00 m

10-1

00 k

calc

areo

us

AT

BR_t

ype

c-1,

50: R

idge

s an

d Fo

othi

lls o

f the

Cry

stal

line

Alps

500-

800

m10

-100

km

²si

liceo

us

AT

KH

_Typ

e c-

1,50

: Lim

esto

ne A

lps

500-

800

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

cala

care

ous

AT

UZA

_Typ

e b-

1,25

: Non

-gla

ciat

ed C

ryst

allin

e A

lps

>1,6

00 m

10-1

00 k

silic

eous

AT

BR_t

ype

d-1,

75: R

idge

s an

d Fo

othi

lls o

f the

Cry

stal

line

Alp

s20

0-50

0 m

10

-100

km

²si

liceo

us

SI

SI_

_VR

1: A

lpin

e S

ava

<400

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

cala

care

ous

AT

UZA

_Typ

e c-

1,50

: Non

-gla

ciat

ed C

ryst

allin

e Al

ps80

0-1,

600

m

10-1

00 k

silic

eous

AT

UZA

_Typ

e c-

1,50

: Non

-gla

ciat

ed C

ryst

allin

e Al

ps50

0-80

0 m

100-

1,00

0 km

² si

liceo

us

AT

ST_

Larg

e R

iver

s_A

lpin

e R

iver

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Mur

, Dra

u,

Sal

zach

, Inn

20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²

DE

Type

1.2

: Mid

-siz

ed a

lpin

e st

ream

s >8

00 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

AT

BR_t

ype

c-1,

50: R

idge

s an

d Fo

othi

lls o

f the

Cry

stal

line

Alps

200-

500

m10

0-1,

000

km²

silic

eous

AT

ST_

Larg

e R

iver

s_A

lpin

e R

iver

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Mur

, Dra

u,

Sal

zach

, Inn

50

0-80

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²

AT

KH_T

ype

c-1,

50: L

imes

tone

Alp

s 8

00-1

,600

m10

0-1,

000

km²

cala

care

ous

AT

BR_t

ype

c-1,

50: R

idge

s an

d Fo

othi

lls o

f the

Cry

stal

line

Alps

500-

800

m

100-

1,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_4_1

4AT

ST_

Larg

e R

iver

s_A

lpin

e R

iver

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Mur

, Dra

u,

Sal

zach

, Inn

<2

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²

1000

_4_4

AT

UZA

_Typ

e c-

1,50

: Non

-gla

ciat

ed C

ryst

allin

e Al

ps80

0-1,

600

m10

0-1,

000

km²

silic

eous

AT

KV_T

ype

d-1,

75: L

imes

tone

Foo

thills

500-

800

m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

DE

Typ

4: L

arge

rive

rs in

the

alpi

ne fo

othi

lls

>800

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

AT

KH_T

ype

c-1,

50: L

imes

tone

Alp

s50

0-80

0 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

laca

reou

s

AT

KH_T

ype

c-1,

50: L

imes

tone

Alp

s 8

00-1

,600

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

cala

care

ous

SI

SI_4

_KB

-AL-

D_2

_KI:

Med

ium

-siz

e riv

ers

of C

arbo

nate

Alp

s-D

anub

e riv

er b

asin

with

a k

arst

spr

ing

influ

ence

>400

m10

0-1,

000

km²

cala

care

ous

AT

ST_L

arge

Riv

ers_

Alpi

ne R

iver

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Mur

, Dra

u,

Salz

ach,

Inn

800

-1,6

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²

SI

SI_4

_KB

-AL-

D_2

_IiJ

: Med

ium

-siz

e riv

ers

of C

arbo

nate

Alp

s-D

anub

e riv

er b

asin

with

a la

ke o

utflo

w in

fluen

ce>4

00 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

laca

reou

s

SI

SI_4

_PA

-hrib

-D_2

: Med

ium

-siz

e riv

ers

of P

re-a

lpin

e hi

lls-

Dan

ube

river

bas

in>2

00 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

laca

reou

s

1000

_4_1

2

1000

_4_9

Ecor

egio

n 4

Alps

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Ecor

egio

n 4

Alps

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_4_5

1000

_4_1

0

1000

_4_1

3

1000

_4_8

Ecor

egio

n 4

Alps

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_4_3

1000

_4_2

1000

_4_1

Page 15: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies

page 15

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

Table 5 (continued)

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

1000

_5_1

BA

WB_

Type

_5.2

2: M

ount

ain

Broo

k on

silic

ate

grou

nd a

nd c

oars

e su

bstra

te>8

00 m

10-1

00 k

silic

eous

HR

Type

14a

: Hilly

larg

e tra

verti

ne ri

vers

200-

800

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

HR

Type

14c

: Low

land

larg

e tra

verti

ne ri

vers

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

cala

care

ous

HR

Type

13a

:Hilly

med

ium

trav

ertin

e riv

ers

200-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_3.4

: Med

ium

big

low

land

-hilly

w

ater

cour

se o

n ca

rbon

ate

grou

nd a

nd c

oars

e su

bstra

te20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-4,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_3.1

: Med

ium

big

low

land

wat

erco

urse

on

carb

onat

e gr

ound

and

coa

rse

subs

trate

<200

m1,

000-

4,00

0 km

²ca

laca

reou

s

HR

Type

13b

: Hilly

med

ium

non

-trav

ertin

e riv

ers

200-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_2.4

: Big

low

land

-hilly

wat

erco

urse

on

carb

onat

e gr

ound

and

coa

rse

subs

trate

200-

500

m>4

,000

km

²ca

lcar

eous

BA

WB_

Type

_3.2

: Med

ium

big

low

land

wat

erco

urse

on

carb

onat

e gr

ound

and

med

ium

sub

stra

te<2

00 m

1,00

0-4,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_4.4

: Sm

all l

owla

nd-h

illy w

ater

cour

se o

n ca

rbon

ate

grou

nd a

nd c

oars

e su

bstra

te20

0-50

0 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

BA

WB_

Type

_2.1

7: B

ig lo

wla

nd –

hilly

wat

erco

urse

on

silic

ate

grou

nd a

nd m

ediu

m s

ubst

rate

20

0-50

0 m

>4,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

SI

SI__

VR5:

Kol

pa<2

00 m

>1,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_4.7

: Sm

all h

illy-m

ount

aino

us

wat

erco

urse

on

carb

onat

e gr

ound

and

coa

rse

subs

trate

500-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

SI

SI__

VR3:

Din

aric

Sav

a>4

00 m

>2,5

00 k

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_3.1

4: M

ediu

m b

ig lo

wla

nd w

ater

cour

se o

n si

licat

e gr

ound

and

med

ium

sub

stra

te<2

00 m

1,00

0-4,

000

km²

silic

eous

SI

SI_5

_ED

-hrib

_2_K

I: M

ediu

m-s

ize

river

s of

Din

aric

hi

lls>2

00 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

1000

_5_4

BA

WB_

Type

_2.1

6: B

ig lo

wla

nd –

hilly

wat

erco

urse

on

silic

ate

grou

nd a

nd c

oars

e su

bstra

te20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-4,

000

km²

silic

eous

BA

WB_

Type

_2.1

4: B

ig lo

wla

nd w

ater

cour

se o

n si

licat

e gr

ound

and

med

ium

sub

stra

te<2

00 m

>4,0

00 k

silic

eous

SI

SI_5

_PD

-hrib

-rav

ni_2

: Med

ium

-siz

e riv

ers

of P

re-

Din

aric

hills

and

pla

ins

>100

m10

0-1,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

1000

_5_7

BA

WB_

Type

_1.1

4: V

ery

big

low

land

wat

erco

urse

on

silic

ate

grou

nd a

nd m

ediu

m s

ubst

rate

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_5_3

Ecor

egio

n 5

Din

aric

Wes

tern

Bal

kan

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Ecor

egio

n 5

Din

aric

Wes

tern

Bal

kan

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_5_2

Ecor

egio

n 5

Din

aric

Wes

tern

Bal

kan

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_5_5

1000

_5_6

Page 16: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

“Table of harmonisation” - comparative tables of national stream types in the DRBD

page 16

Table 5 (continued)

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

DE

Type

5: S

mal

l coa

rse

subs

trate

dom

inat

ed s

iliceo

us h

ighl

and

river

s 20

0->8

00 m

10

-100

km

²si

liceo

us

DE

Type

9.2

: Lar

ge h

ighl

and

river

s 20

0->8

00 m

1,

000-

10,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

AT

GG

_Typ

e c-

1,50

: Gra

nite

and

Gne

iss

Reg

ion

of B

ohem

ian

Mas

sif

500-

800

m10

-100

km

²si

liceo

us

AT

AV

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Bav

aria

n A

ustri

an P

iedm

ont

200-

500

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

terti

ary

and

quar

tern

ary

sedi

men

ts

DE

Type

9: M

id-s

ized

fine

to c

oars

e su

bstra

te d

omin

ated

silic

eous

hig

hlan

d riv

ers

200-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

silic

eous

ATST

_Lar

ge R

iver

s_Th

aya_

Type

d-1

,75

200-

500

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

AT

GG

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Gra

nite

and

Gne

iss

Reg

ion

of B

ohem

ian

Mas

sif

200-

500

m a

nd 5

00-8

00 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_9_6

DE

Type

10:

Ver

y la

rge

grav

el-d

omin

ated

rive

rs

200-

800

m>1

0,00

0 km

²ca

laca

reou

s

CZ

Type

34:

gre

ater

sil.

Her

cyni

um fo

othi

ll st

ream

200-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

silic

eous

1000

_9_8

CZ

Type

24:

sm

all s

il. H

ercy

nium

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

10-1

00 k

silic

eous

1000

_9_3

DE

Tye

9.1:

Mid

-siz

ed fi

ne to

coa

rse

subs

trate

dom

inat

ed c

alca

reou

s hi

ghla

nd ri

vers

200-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

AT

GG

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Gra

nite

and

Gne

iss

Reg

ion

of B

ohem

ian

Mas

sif

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

AT

GG

_Typ

e d-

1,75

: Gra

nite

and

Gne

iss

Reg

ion

of B

ohem

ian

Mas

sif

200

-500

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

CZ

Type

27:

gre

at s

il. H

ercy

nium

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

CZ

Type

35:

gre

at s

il. H

ercy

nium

foot

hill

stre

am 2

00-5

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_9_5

1000

_9_9

Ecor

egio

n 9

Cen

tral

Hig

hlan

ds

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_9_4

Ecor

egio

n 9

Cen

tral

Hig

hlan

ds

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_9_1

1000

_9_2

Page 17: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 17

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

Table 5 (continued)

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

UA

3A: S

mal

l riv

ers,

cal

care

ous,

mid

-mou

ntai

n>8

00 m

10-1

00 k

calc

areo

us

SK

K2V-

H1:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, 2

00-5

00 m

, Car

path

ians

20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

SK

K4M

: Sm

all s

tream

s, >

800

m, C

arpa

thia

ns>8

00 m

10-1

00 k

mix

ed

SK

K2V-

H2:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, 2

00-5

00 m

, Car

path

ians

20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_10_

2R

O

01: M

ount

ain

stre

am>8

00 m

10-1

,000

km

²si

liceo

us, c

alac

areo

us

SK

K2V-

R1:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, 2

00-5

00 m

, Car

path

ians

20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_10_

3U

A

3B: M

ediu

m ri

vers

, cal

care

ous,

mid

-mou

ntai

n>8

00 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

SK

K2V-

V2: L

arge

stre

ams,

200

-500

m, C

arpa

thia

ns20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

SK

K2M

: Mid

dle

size

stre

ams,

200

-500

m, C

arpa

thia

ns20

0-50

0 m

10-1

00 k

mix

ed

SK

K2V-

V1: L

arge

stre

ams,

500

-800

m, C

arpa

thia

ns50

0-80

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

SK

K3M

: Mid

dle

size

stre

ams,

500

-800

m, C

arpa

thia

ns50

0-80

0 m

10-1

00 k

mix

ed

RO

03: S

tream

sec

tor i

n pi

ed-m

ont o

r hig

h pl

atea

u ar

ea50

0-80

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_10_

5U

A

2A: S

mal

l riv

ers,

cal

care

ous,

low

-mou

ntai

n20

0-80

0 m

10-1

00 k

calc

areo

us

RO

04: S

tream

sec

tor i

n hi

lly o

r pla

teau

are

a 20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

SK

K2S

: Mid

dle

size

stre

ams,

200

-500

m, C

arpa

thia

ns20

0-50

0 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²m

ixed

RO

06: S

tream

sec

tor w

ith w

etla

nds

in h

illy o

r pla

teau

are

a20

0-50

0 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us, o

rgan

ic

SK

K3S

: Mid

dle

size

stre

ams,

500

-800

m, C

arpa

thia

ns50

0-80

0 m

100-

1,00

0 km

²m

ixed

RO

08: S

tream

sec

tor i

n hi

lly o

r pla

teau

are

a20

0-50

0 m

1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

1000

_10_

7U

A

2B: S

Med

ium

river

s, c

alca

reou

s, lo

w-m

ount

ain

200-

800

m10

0-1,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

1000

_10_

10U

A

2C: L

arge

rive

rs, l

ow-m

ount

ain

200-

800

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

RO

02: S

tream

in p

ied-

mon

t or h

igh

plat

eau

area

50

0-80

0 m

10

-1,0

00 k

silic

eous

1000

_10_

11C

Z

Type

3: g

reat

silic

. Car

path

ian

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

RO

05: S

tream

sec

tors

in in

tram

ount

ain

depr

essi

on50

0-80

0 m

10

-1,0

00 k

silic

eous

ATST

_Lar

ge R

iver

s_Th

aya_

Type

e-2

,00

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

ATST

_Lar

ge R

iver

s_M

orav

a_Ty

pe e

-2,0

0<2

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²

Ecor

egio

n 10

The

Car

path

ians

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_10_

8

1000

_10_

6

1000

_10_

4

1000

_10_

1

1000

_10_

9

1000

_10_

12

Ecor

egio

n 10

The

Car

path

ians

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Page 18: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

ANNEX 1: Title of Annex 1

page 18

Table 5 (continued)

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

1000

_11_

1AT

FH_T

ype

d-1,

75: E

aste

rn R

idge

s an

d Lo

wla

nds

200-

500

m10

-100

km

² te

rtiar

y an

d qu

arte

rnar

y se

dim

ents

1000

_11_

9R

O

10: S

tream

in

plai

n ar

ea<2

00 m

10-1

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

CZ

Type

16:

gre

at c

al. P

anon

nic.

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

1,0

00-1

0,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

CZ

Type

11:

gre

ater

sil.

Pan

onni

c. lo

wla

nd s

tream

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_11_

2AT

FH_T

ype

d-1,

75: E

aste

rn R

idge

s an

d Lo

wla

nds

200-

500

m 1

00-1

,000

km

²te

rtiar

y an

d qu

arte

rnar

y se

dim

ents

CZ

Type

13:

gre

at s

ilic. P

anon

nic.

low

land

stre

am

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

HU

Type

13:

larg

e ca

lcar

eous

low

land

stre

am<

200

m1,

000-

12,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

HR

Type

9a:

Low

land

ver

y la

rge

river

s, D

rava

low

er p

art

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

AT

FH_T

ype

d-1,

75: E

aste

rn R

idge

s an

d Lo

wla

nds

200-

500

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

terti

ary

and

quar

tern

ary

sedi

men

ts

HR

Type

6: L

owla

nd la

rge

river

s, lo

ver p

arts

, car

st c

atch

men

t are

a<2

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

HU

Type

19:

larg

e ca

lcar

eous

low

land

stre

ams

<200

m1,

000-

12,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

HR

Typ

9b: L

owla

nd v

ery

larg

e riv

ers,

Sav

a lo

wer

par

t<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

silic

eous

SI

SI__

VR

6: P

anno

nian

Sav

a>4

00 m

>2,5

00 k

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_2.1

4: B

ig lo

wla

nd w

ater

cour

se o

n si

licat

e gr

ound

and

m

ediu

m s

ubst

rate

<2

00 m

>4,0

00 k

silic

eous

UA

1C: L

arge

rive

rs, l

owla

nd<

200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

cala

care

ous

HR

Type

7a:

Low

land

ver

y la

rge

river

s, D

rava

and

Mur

a<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

silic

eous

HU

Type

11:

sm

all c

alca

reou

s lo

wla

nd s

tream

<200

m10

-200

km

²ca

lcar

eous

SK

P1V

- B1:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, <

200

m,

in H

unga

rian

low

land

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

CZ

Type

16:

gre

at c

al. P

anon

nic.

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

1,0

00-1

0,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

HR

Type

8: L

owla

nd v

ery

larg

e riv

ers,

Sav

a m

ediu

m p

art

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

HU

Type

15:

sm

all c

alca

reou

s lo

wla

nd b

rook

<200

m10

-200

km

²ca

lcar

eous

SK

P1V

- R2:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, <

200

m,

in H

unga

rian

low

land

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

HU

Type

13:

larg

e ca

lcar

eous

low

land

stre

am<

200

m1,

000-

12,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_1.1

5: V

ery

big

low

land

wat

erco

urse

on

silic

ate

grou

nd a

nd fi

ne s

ubst

rate

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

HU

Type

16:

sm

all w

ith lo

w s

lope

cal

cero

us lo

wla

nd s

tream

< 20

0 m

10-2

00 k

calc

areo

us

SK

P1V

- I1:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, <

200

m,

in H

unga

rian

low

land

<200

m1,

000-

10,0

00 k

silic

eous

HU

Type

19:

larg

e ca

lcar

eous

low

land

stre

ams

<200

m1,

000-

12,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

BA

WB_

Type

_1.1

4: V

ery

big

low

land

wat

erco

urse

on

silic

ate

grou

nd a

nd m

ediu

m s

ubst

rate

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_11_

5H

U

Type

21:

sm

all o

rgan

ic lo

wla

nd s

tream

<200

m10

-200

mor

gani

c

SKP1

V - V

3: L

arge

stre

ams,

< 2

00 m

, in

Hun

garia

n lo

wla

nd<2

00 m

silic

eous

UA

1C: L

arge

rive

rs, l

owla

nd<2

00 m

1,00

0-10

,000

km

²ca

laca

reou

s

SK

P1V

- M1:

Lar

ge s

tream

s, <

200

m,

in H

unga

rian

low

land

<200

m

>10,

000

km²

silic

eous

1000

_11_

6AT

FH_T

ype

d-1,

75: E

aste

rn R

idge

s an

d Lo

wla

nds

<200

m10

0-1,

000

km²

terti

ary

and

quar

tern

ary

sedi

men

ts

RO

11: S

tream

sec

tor i

n pl

ain

area

<200

m1,

000-

3,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

HU

Type

14:

ver

y la

rge

calc

areo

us lo

wla

nd s

tream

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

HU

Type

12:

med

ium

cal

care

ous

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

100-

2,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

RO

12: S

tream

sec

tor i

n pl

ain

area

<200

m>3

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

HU

Type

20:

ver

y la

rge

calc

areo

us lo

wla

nd ri

ver

<200

m>1

0,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

HU

Type

17:

med

ium

with

low

slo

pe c

alce

rous

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

100-

2,00

0 km

²ca

lcar

eous

RO

13: S

tream

sec

tor w

ith w

etla

nds

in p

lain

are

a<2

00 m

>3,0

00 k

silic

eous

HR

Type

7b:

Low

land

ver

y la

rge

river

s, S

ava

uppe

r par

t<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

calc

arou

s

HU

Type

18:

mid

dle

calc

areo

us lo

wla

nd s

tream

<200

m10

0-2,

000

km²

calc

areo

us

SI

SI__

VR8:

With

in-a

lpin

e D

rava

<400

m>2

,500

km

²si

liceo

us

UA

1D: V

ery

larg

e riv

er, l

owla

nd<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

cala

care

ous

1000

_11_

8H

U

Type

22:

med

ium

org

anic

low

land

stre

am<2

00 m

100-

2,00

0 km

²or

gani

c

SI

SI__

VR9:

Mur

a an

d fla

t-lan

d D

rava

<400

m>2

,500

km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_11_

13

1000

_11_

11

Ecor

egio

n 11

Hun

garia

n Lo

wla

nd

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_11_

12

1000

_11_

10

Ecor

egio

n 11

Hun

garia

n Lo

wla

nd

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_11_

4

1000

_11_

7

1000

_11_

3

Ecor

egio

n 11

Hun

garia

n Lo

wla

nd

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Ecor

egio

n 11

Hun

garia

n Lo

wla

nd

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Page 19: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 19

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

Table 5 (continued)

DR

B-T

ype

DR

B-T

ype

1000

_12_

1B

G

TR15

: alp

ine,

mid

dle

size

rive

r>1

,500

m10

-1,0

00 k

mix

ed

BG

TR 4

: low

land

, sm

all s

ize

river

0-20

0 m

>1,0

00 k

mix

ed

BG

TR9:

mid

-alti

tude

, mid

dle

size

rive

r20

0-80

0 m

10-1

,000

km

²m

ixed

BG

TR 7

: low

land

, sm

all s

ize

river

0-20

0 m

>1,0

00 k

mix

ed

BG

TR13

: mid

-alti

tude

, mid

dle

size

rive

r20

0-80

0 m

10-1

,000

km

²m

ixed

1000

_12_

7B

G

TR 2

: low

land

, sm

all s

ize

river

0-20

0 m

>1,0

00 k

calc

areo

us

1000

_12_

3B

G

TR11

: mid

-alti

tude

, mid

dle

size

rive

r20

0-80

0 m

10-1

,000

km

²ca

lcar

eous

1000

_12_

8R

O

16: S

tream

sec

tor i

n pl

ain

area

<200

m1,

000-

5,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_12_

4B

G

TR12

: mid

-alti

tude

, mid

dle

size

rive

r20

0-80

0 m

>1,0

00 k

mix

ed

RO

17: S

tream

sec

tor i

n pl

ain

area

<200

m>5

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

BG

TR5:

low

land

, sm

all s

ize

river

0-20

0 m

10-1

,000

km

²m

ixed

RO

18: S

tream

sec

tor w

ith w

etla

nds

in p

lain

are

a<2

00 m

>5,0

00 k

silic

eous

BG

TR8:

low

land

, sm

all s

ize

river

0-20

0 m

10-1

,000

km

²m

ixed

1000

_12_

10M

D

06: s

tream

sec

tor w

ith w

etla

nds

in p

lain

are

a<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

silic

eous

1000

_12_

6

1000

_12_

9

Ecor

egio

n 12

Pon

tic P

rovi

nce

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Ecor

egio

n 12

Pon

tic P

rovi

nce

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_12_

2

1000

_12_

5

Page 20: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

ANNEX 1: Title of Annex 1

page 20

Table 5 (continued)

DR

B-T

ype

1000

_16_

1R

O

23: S

tream

in h

illy o

r pla

teau

are

a

200-

500

m10

-1,0

00 k

silic

eous

1000

_16_

2R

O

24: S

tream

in p

lain

are

a<2

00 m

10-2

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

1000

_16_

3R

O

25: S

tream

sec

tor

with

wet

land

s in

pla

in a

rea

<200

m1,

000-

5,00

0 km

²si

liceo

us

MD

02: s

tream

sec

tor i

n pl

ain

area

<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

silic

eous

RO

26: S

tream

sec

tor i

n pl

ain

area

<200

m>5

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

RO

27: S

tream

sec

tor w

ith w

etla

nds

in p

lain

are

a <2

00 m

>5,0

00 k

silic

eous

MD

03: s

tream

sec

tor w

ith w

etla

nds

in p

lain

are

a<2

00 m

>10,

000

km²

silic

eous

Ecor

egio

n 16

Eas

tern

Pla

ins

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

1000

_16_

4

1000

_16_

5

DR

B-T

ype

1000

_99_

1D

E

Typ

21: L

ake

outfl

ows

<2

00 m

and

200

-800

m10

-1,0

00 k

silic

eous

, cal

care

ous

1000

_99_

2R

O

31: T

empo

rary

stre

am in

pla

teau

are

a20

0-50

0 m

10-1

,000

km

²si

liceo

us

Ecor

egio

n in

depe

nden

t

Nat

iona

l Typ

es

Page 21: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 21

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

5. DISCUSSION

For the harmonisation of national stream types at relevant rivers in the Danube River Basin parameters of the typology System A according to Annex II of the EU WFD (ecoregion, altitude, catchment area, geology) and respective parameter classes according to Annex II of the EU WFD were selected. This approach provided a high level of aggregation, e.g. relevant for cartographic editing.

Gaps

Nevertheless, the compilation of the “Table of Harmonisation” remained incomplete due to incomplete data about typologies of Moldova and Ukraine. In addition, the missing allocation of Serbian types to respective ecoregions prevented further processing of Serbian data.

However, most likely the number of harmonised types will not increase significantly when adding the information on national typologies currently lacking.

Prospect

Due to the differences in national typologies the aggregation of stream types based on additional parameters such as mean substratum composition was not practicable. This approach would have increased the total number of harmonised types, nevertheless it also would have allowed for the assignment of biologically meaningful stream types on the international level, e.g. to further facilitate the comparison of biological assessment results among countries. However, the collected base data may serve this purpose on a smaller sub-basin scale.

Comparison: Table of harmonisation and intercalibration

The concept for harmonisation underlying this analysis differed from the approach followed in the Eastern Continental intercalibration exercise. The latter aimed at defining stream types for the intercalibration of biological classification schemes. Besides pooling of different ecoregions and geology classes, channel substrates and more precise altitude classification were used to assign common intercalibration stream types. These types covered various countries and included different national stream types (or parts thereof).

The small to medium-sized mountain streams of the Carpathians (R-E1), for example, correspond to the harmonised type 1000_10_8. Although Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovak Republic took part in intercalibration of this type, 1000_10_8 only represents an aggregation of Romanian types. Corresponding types of other countries are not located at streams relevant to this study. The intercalibration type of large lowland rivers with mixed geology (R-E3) embraces 10 harmonised types (1000_11_10 to 13 and 1000_12_6 to 11) because of its combined ecoregional and geological characteristics.

Page 22: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 23: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 23

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

ANNEXES

ANNEX 1 List of rivers selected for the basin-wide overview of the DRB - Basis of the “Table of Harmonisation”

ANNEX 2 Overview of national descriptions of stream types at relevant rivers, sorted by ecoregion

Page 24: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 25: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 25

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

ANNEX 1

LIST OF RIVERS SELECTED FOR THE BASIN-WIDE OVERVIEW OF THE DRB - BASIS OF THE “TABLE OF HARMONISATION”

Page 26: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 27: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 27

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

LIST OF RIVERS SELECTED FOR THE BASIN-WIDE OVERVIEW OF THE DRB - BASIS OF THE “TABLE OF HARMONISATION” This list includes all rivers with a catchment size > 4 000 km² as depicted in the DRB overview map.

Name of river Countries (from source to mouth) Name of river Countries

(from source to mouth)

Lech AT, DE Sava HR, SI, BH, CS, AL

Naab CZ, DE Drina AL, BH, CS

Isar AT, DE Lim AL, CS, BH

Inn CH, IT, AT, DE Bosna BH

Salzach AT, DE Vrbas BH

Traun AT Una HR, BH

Enns AT Kolpa/Kupa SI, HR

Morava/March CZ, SK, AT Timis/Tami RO, CS

Dyje/Thaya CZ, AT Velika Morava MK, BG, CS

Svratka CZ Zapadna Morava CS

Raab/Rába AT, HU Ibar CS

Rabnitz/Rábca/Répce AT, HU Juzna Morava MK, BG, CS

Váh PL, SK Nisava BG, CS

Nitra SK Timok CS, BG

Hron SK Jiu RO

Ipel/Ipoly SK, HU Ogosta BG

Sió HU Iskâr BG

Drau/Drava IT, AT, SI, HR HU Olt RO

Mur/Mura AT, SI, HR, HU Yantra BG

Tysa/Tisza/Tisa UA, RO, HU, SK, CS Vedea RO

Bega/Begej RO, CS Arges RO

Mures/Maros RO, HU Ialomita RO

Târnava RO Seret/Siret UA, RO

Körös RO, HU Buzau RO

Hortobágy-Berettyó HU Barlad RO

Kettos-Körös (Fekete+Fehér) RO, HU Trotus RO

Crisul Alb/Fehér-Körös RO, HU Bistrita RO

Crisul Negru/Fekete-Körös RO, HU Moldova RO

Barcau/Berettyó RO, HU Prut UA, MD, RO

Crisul Repede/Sebes-Körös RO, HU Jijia RO

Zagyva HU Ialpug MD, UA

Slaná/Sajó SK, HU

Hornád/Hernád SK, HU

Bodrog UA, SK, HU

Ondava SK

Latorica SK, UA

Somes/Szamos RO, HU

Somesul Mare RO

Somesul Mic RO

Zala HU

Page 28: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 29: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 29

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

ANNEX 2

OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL DESCRIPTIONS OF STREAM TYPES AT RELEVANT RIVERS, SORTED BY ECOREGION

Page 30: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 31: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 31

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL DESCRIPTIONS OF STREAM TYPES AT RELEVANT RIVERS, SORTED BY ECOREGION ECOREGION 4 ALPS

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

[l/s] valley shape

channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s]

DE_Typ 1.1 Small alpine streams >800 11-100 cal calcareous Alps, Flysch, coarse material floodplains 6-45

blocks, boulders, pebbles, large-sized sand

V and U-shaped valley braided

DE_Typ 1.2 Mid-sized alpine streams >800 100-1,000 cal calcareous Alps, Flysch, coarse material floodplains 6-45

blocks, boulders, pebbles, large-sized sand

V and U-shaped valley braided

DE_Typ 4 Large rivers in the alpine foothills >800 1,000-10,000 cal large coarse material floodplains >2

stones, in addition blocks and pebbles

wide U-shaped valley anastomosing

AT_UZA_Type b-1,25 Non-glaciated Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,25 >1,600 11-100 sil

AT_UZA_Type c-1,50 Non-glaciated Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 500-799 101-1,000 sil

AT_UZA_Type c-1,50 Non-glaciated Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50

800-1599 11-100 sil

AT_UZA_Type c-1,50 Non-glaciated Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50

800-1599 101-1,000 sil

AT_UZA_Type c-1,50 Non-glaciated Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 800-1599 1,001-10,000 sil

AT_UZA_Type d-1,75 Non-glaciated Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 500-799 1,001-10,000 sil

AT_BR_type c-1,50 Ridges and Foothills of the Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 11-100 sil

AT_BR_Type c-1,50 Ridges and Foothills of the Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 500-799 11-100 sil

AT_BR_Type c-1,50 Ridges and Foothills of the Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 500-799 101-1,000 sil

AT_BR_type d-1,75 Ridges and Foothills of the Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 11-100 sil

AT_BR_type d-1,75 Ridges and Foothills of the Crystalline Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 101-1,000 sil

AT_KV_Type d-1,75 Limestone Foothills, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75

200-499 1,001-10,000 cal

AT_KV_Type d-1,75 Limestone Foothills, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75

500-799 1,001-10,000 cal

AT_KV_Type d-1,75 Limestone Foothills, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 500-799 101-1,000 cal

AT_KH_Type b-1,25 Limestone Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,25 800-1599 11-100 cal

AT_KH_Type b-1,25 Limestone Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,25 >1,600 11-100 cal

AT_KH_Type c-1,50 Limestone Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 500-799 101-1,000 cal

AT_KH_Type c-1,50 Limestone Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 500-799 1,001-10,000 cal

AT_KH_Type c-1,50 Limestone Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 800-1599 101-1,000 cal

AT_KH_Type c-1,50 Limestone Alps, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 800-1,599 1,001-10,000 cal

AT_ ST_Large Rivers_ Alpine River_Type c-1,50

Alpine Rivers (Mur, Drau, Salzach, Inn), Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50

<200 1,001-10,000

AT_ ST_Large Rivers_ Alpine River_Type d-1,75

Alpine Rivers (Mur, Drau, Salzach, Inn), Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75

200-499 1,001-10,000

AT_ ST_Large Rivers_ Alpine River_Type d-1,75

Alpine Rivers (Mur, Drau, Salzach, Inn), Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 500-799 1,001-10,000

AT_ ST_Large Rivers_ Alpine River_Type d-1,75

Alpine Rivers (Mur, Drau, Salzach, Inn), Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 800-1,599 1,001-10,000

Page 32: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

ANNEX 2: Overview of national descriptions of stream types at relevant rivers, sorted by ecoregion

page 32

ECOREGION 4 ALPS (continued)

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

[l/s] valley shape

channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s]

SI_4_KB-AL-D_1_LI Small rivers of Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin with a limnocrene spring influence

>800 10-100 cal Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin

permanent - limnocrene spring influence

SI_4_KB-AL-D_1_KI Small rivers of Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin with a karst spring influence >400 10-100 cal

Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin permanent

SI_4_KB-AL-D_2_KI Medium-size rivers of Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin with a karst spring influence

>400 100-1,000 cal Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin

SI_4_KB-AL-D_2_IiJ Medium-size rivers of Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin with a lake outflow influence

>400 100-1,000 cal Carbonate Alps-Danube river basin

permanent - lake outflow influence

SI_4_PA-hrib-D_2 Medium-size rivers of Pre-alpine hills-Danube river basin >200 100-1,000 cal

Pre-alpine hills-Danube river basin permanent

SI__VR1 Alpine Sava <400 >1,000 cal permanent

Page 33: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 33

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

ECOREGION 5 DINARIC WESTERN BALKAN

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

[l/s]

valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s] HR_Type 13a Hilly medium travertine rivers 200-800 100-1,000 cal Continental Dinaric Sub-ecoregion 2-20 HR_Type 13b Hilly medium non-travertine rivers 200-800 100-1,000 cal Continental Dinaric Sub-ecoregion 2-20 HR_Type 14a Hilly large travertine rivers 200-800 1,000-10,000 cal Continental Dinaric Sub-ecoregion >20 HR_Type 14c Lowland large travertine rivers < 200 1,000-10,000 cal Continental Dinaric Sub-ecoregion >20

BA_WB_Type_3.4 Medium big lowland-hilly watercourse on carbonate ground and coarse substrate

200-500 1,000-4,000 cal 1-3,7 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm) >10,000 canyon permanent

BA_WB_Type_4.4 Small lowland-hilly watercourse on carbonate ground and coarse substrate

200-500 100-1,000 cal 0.56-2,3 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm) >10,000

meander valley, canyon

permanent

BA_WB_Type_4.7 Small hilly-mountainous watercourse on carbonate ground and coarse substrate

500-800 100-1,000 cal 4.6 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm)

>10,000 canyon permanent

BA_WB_Type_5.22 Mountain Brook on silicate ground and coarse substrate

>800 <100 sil 7.8 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm)

1,000-10,000 canyon permanent

BA_WB_Type_3.1 Medium big lowland watercourse on carbonate ground and coarse substrate

0-200 1,000-4,000 cal 1.5-2,2 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm)

>10,000 meander

valley canyon

permanent

BA_WB_Type_3.14 Medium big lowland watercourse on silicate ground and medium substrate

0-200 1,000-4,000 sil 2.36-8 mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6 cm) >10,000

meander valley permanent

BA_WB_Type_3.2 Medium big lowland watercourse on carbonate ground and medium substrate

0-200 1,000-4,000 cal 0.9 mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6 cm) >10,000

meander valley permanent

BA_WB_Type_2.4 Big lowland-hilly watercourse on carbonate ground and coarse substrate

200-500 >4,000 cal 1.5-2

mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6 cm), megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm)

>10,000 canyon permanent

BA_WB_Type_2.17 Big lowland – hilly watercourse on silicate ground and medium substrate

200-500 >4,000 cal 1.77 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm)

10-300 canyon permanent

BA_WB_Type_2.16 Big lowland – hilly watercourse on silicate ground and coarse substrate

200-500 >4,000 sil 0.82-1.9 megalithal, macrolithal (>25.6 cm)

>10,000 canyon permanent

BA_WB_Type_1.14 Very big lowland watercourse on silicate ground and medium substrate

0-200 >10,000 sil 0.5-1.35 mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6 cm)

>10,000 meander

valley canyon

permanent

BA_WB_Type_2.14 Big lowland watercourse on silicate ground and medium substrate 0-200 >4,000 sil 0.47 -0,9

mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6 cm) >10,000

meander valley permanent

SI_5_ED-hrib_2_KI Medium-size rivers of Dinaric hills >200 100-1,000 cal Dinaric hills permanent

SI_5_PD-hrib-ravni_2 Medium-size rivers of Pre-Dinaric hills and plains >100 100-1,000 cal Pre-Dinaric hills and plains permanent

SI__VR3 Dinaric Sava <400 >2,500 cal permanent SI__VR5 Kolpa <200 >1,000 cal permanent

Page 34: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

ANNEX 2: Overview of national descriptions of stream types at relevant rivers, sorted by ecoregion

page 34

ECOREGION 6 HELLENIC WESTERN BALKAN

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

[l/s] valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s] no data

ECOREGION 7 EASTERN BALKAN

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

[l/s] valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s] no data

ECOREGION 9 CENTRAL HIGHLANDES

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

[l/s] valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s]

DE_Typ 5 Small coarse substrate dominated siliceous highland rivers

200-> 00 10-100 sil schists, gneiss, granites 10-50 cobbles and stones, pebbles

V-and U-shaped valley, trought

sinuate to meandering,

braiding channels permanent

DE_Typ 9 Mid-sized fine to coarse substrate dominated siliceous highland rivers 200-> 00 100-1,000 sil

schists, gneiss, granites, Buntsandstein sandstone 2-6

cobbles and stones, many pebbles

V-and U-shaped valley

sinuate to meandering,

braiding channels permanent

DE_Typ 9.1 Mid-sized fine to coarse substrate dominated calcareous highland rivers 200-> 00 100-1,000 cal

Lacustrine limestone, Lower an Middle Jurassic rocks, loess regions

0.7-4.0 cobbles and stones, pebbles U-shaped valley

sinuate to meandering,

braiding channels permanent

DE_Typ 9.2 Large highland rivers 200-> 00 1,000-10,000 cal Large floodplains 3 stones and cobbles floodplain valley sinuate to

meandering, braiding channels

permanent

DE_Typ 10 Very large gravel-dominated rivers 200->800 >10,000 cal Large floodplains 2 - 0.2 pebbles and cobbles canyon-like to

large floodplains

sinuate to meandering,

braiding channels permanent

AT_GG_Type c-1,50 Granite and Gneiss Region of Bohemian Massif, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,50 500-799 11-100 sil permanent

AT_GG_Type d-1,75 Granite and Gneiss Region of Bohemian Massif, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 101-1,000 sil permanent

AT_GG_Type d-1,75 Granite and Gneiss Region of Bohemian Massif, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 500-799 101-1,000 sil permanent

AT_AV_Type d-1,75 Bavarian Austrian Piedmont, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 1,001-10,000 tq Sed permanent

AT_GG_Type d-1,75 Granite and Gneiss Region of Bohemian Massif, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 1,001-10,000 sil permanent

AT_GG_Type d-1,75 Granite and Gneiss Region of Bohemian Massif, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 <200 1,001-10,000 sil permanent

AT_ST_Large Rivers_Thaya_Type d-1,75

River Thaya Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 1,001-10,000

CZ_Typ 34 greater sil. Hercynium foothill stream 200-800 -1,000 sil V-shaped valley permanent CZ_Typ 35 great sil Hercynium foothill stream 200-800 -10,000 sil meander valley permanent

CZ_Typ 24 small sil,Hercynium lowland stream 0-200 <100 sil floodplain - V shaped valley permanent

CZ_Typ 27 great sil,Hercynium lowland stream 0-200 -10,000 sil floodplain - V shaped valley permanent

Page 35: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 35

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

ECOREGION 10 THE CARPATHIANS

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s]

CZ_Typ 3 great silic,Carpathian lowland stream 0-200 -10,000 sil

plain

floodplain permanent

SK_K2V - H1 Large streams, 200-500 m, Carpathians 200-500 >1,000 sil middle part of Hornad river

2-5 1,000- 10,000

sinuate

SK_K2V - H2 Large streams, 200-500 m, Carpathians 200-500 >1,000 sil lowest part of Hornad river 2-5 >10,000 sinuate SK_K2V - R1 Large streams, 200-500 m, Carpathians 200-500 >1,000 sil middle part of Hron river 2-5 >10,000 sinuate SK_K2V - V2 Large streams, 200-500 m, Carpathians 200-500 1,000-10,000 sil middle part of Vah river <2 >10,000 sinuate

SK_K3V - V1 Large streams, 500-800 m, Carpathians 500-800 1,000-10,000 sil upper part of Vah river with its tributaries <2 >10,000 sinuate

SK_K2M Small streams, 200-500 m, Carpathians 200-500 10-100 mixed 5-50 1,000-10,000 sinuate SK_K3M Small streams, 500-800 m, Carpathians 500-800 10-100 mixed 5-50 sinuate SK_K4M Small streams, >800 m, Carpathians >800 10-100 mixed 5-50 sinuate SK_K2S Middle size streams, 200-500 m, Carpathians 200-500 100-1,000 mixed sinuate SK_K3S Middle size streams, 500-800 m, Carpathians 500-800 100-1,000 mixed 5-50 1,000-10,000 sinuate AT_ST_Large Rivers_Thaya_Type e-2,00

River Thaya Saprobiological Basic Condition = 2,00 <200 1,001-10,000

AT_ST_Large Rivers_Morava_Type e-2,00

River Morava Saprobiological Basic Condition = 2,00

<200 1,001-10,000

RO01 Mountain stream >800 10-1,000 sil, cal 40-200 Blocks, boulders, gravel

RO02 Stream in pied-mont or high plateau area 500-800 10-1,000 sil 20-50 Boulders, gravel

RO03 Stream sector in pied-mont or high plateau area 500-800 1,000-10,000 sil 3-20 Gravel, boulders

RO04 Stream sector in hilly or plateau area 200-500 1,000-10,000 sil 0,5-5 Sand, gravel

RO05 Stream sectors in intramountain depression 500-800 10-1,000 sil 1-3 Sand, gravel, boulders

RO06 Stream sector with wetlands in hilly or plateau area

200-500 1,000-10,000 sil, org 1-2 Sand, gravel

RO08 Stream sector in hilly or plateau area 200-500 1,000-10,000 sil Subecoregion 10- Carphatian Intramountain area/ Transilvanian plateau

3-20 Sand, gravel

UA_ 2A Small rivers, calcareous, low-mountain 200-800 10-100 cal under development pebble UA_ 3A Small rivers, calcareous, mid-mountain ›800 10-100 cal under development boulder UA_ 2B Medium rivers, calcareous, low-mountain 200-800 100-1,000 cal under development pebble UA_ 3B Medium rivers, calcareous, mid-mountain ›800 100-1,000 cal under development boulder UA_ 2C Large rivers, low-mountain 200-800 1,000-10,000 cal under development pebble

Page 36: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

ANNEX 2: Overview of national descriptions of stream types at relevant rivers, sorted by ecoregion

page 36

ECOREGION 11 HUNGARIAN LOWLANDS

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s]

AT_FH_Type d-1,75 Eastern Ridges and Lowlands, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 200-499 11-100 tq Sed

AT_FH_Type d-1,75 Eastern Ridges and Lowlands, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75

200-499 101-1,000 tq Sed

AT_FH_Type d-1,75 Eastern Ridges and Lowlands, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75

200-499 1,001-10,000 tq Sed

AT_FH_Type d-1,75 Eastern Ridges and Lowlands, Saprobiological Basic Condition = 1,75 <200 101-1,000 tq Sed

CZ_Typ 11 greater sil. Panonnic. lowland stream <200 >10,000 sil plain

floodplain permanent

CZ_Typ 13 great silic,Panonnic. lowland stream <200 -10,000 sil

plain

floodplain permanent

HR_Type 9a Lowland very large rivers, Drava lower part <200 >10,000 sil >20 HR_Type 7a Lowland very large rivers, Drava and Mura <200 >10,000 sil >20 HR_Type 9b Lowland very large rivers, Sava lower part <200 >10,000 sil >20 HR_Type 8 Lowland very large rivers, Sava medium part <200 >10,000 sil >20

HR_Type 6 Lowland large rivers, lover parts, carst catchment area

<200 1,000-10,000 sil

>20

BA_WB_Type_1.15 Very big lowland watercourse on silicate ground and fine substrate <200 >10,000

sil sand, mud (<0.2cm) >10,000

meander valley permanent

BA_WB_Type_1.14 Very big lowland watercourse on silicate ground and medium substrate <200 >10,000

sil

mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6cm) >10,000

meander valley canyon

permanent

BA_WB_Type_2.14 Big lowland watercourse on silicate ground and medium substrate

<200 >4,000 sil

mesolithal, microlithal (0.2-25.6cm)

>10,000 meander

valley permanent

CZ_Typ 16 great cal, Panonnic. lowland stream <200 -10,000 cal plain

floodplain permanent

SK_P1V - B1 Large streams, <200 m, in Hungarian lowland <200 >1,000 sil >10,000

plain floodplain sinuate

SK_P1V - R2 Large streams, <200 m, in Hungarian lowland <200 >1,000 sil >10,000 sinuate

SK_P1V - M1 Large streams, <200 m, in Hungarian lowland <200 >10,000 sil >10,000 sinuate

SK_P1V - V3 Large streams, <200 m, in Hungarian lowland <200 sil >10,000 sinuate

SK_P1V - I1 Large streams, <200 m, in Hungarian lowland <200 1,000-10,000 sil >10,000 sinuate

HU- Typ 11 small calcareous lowland stream <200 10-200 cal coarse HU-Typ 12 medium calcareous lowland stream <200 100-2,000 cal coarse HU-Typ 13 large calcareous lowland stream <200 1,000-12,000 cal coarse HU-Typ 14 very large calcareous lowland stream <200 >10,000 cal coarse HU-Typ 15 small calcareous lowland brook <200 10-200 cal middle-fine

HU- Typ 16 small with low slope calcareous lowland stream <200 10-200 cal middle-fine

HU- Typ 17 medium with low slope calcareous lowland stream

<200 100-2000 cal middle-fine

HU-Typ 18 middle calcareous lowland stream <200 100-2000 cal middle-fine HU-Typ 19 large calcareous lowland streams <200 1,000-12,000 cal middle-fine HU-Typ 20 very large calcareous lowland river <200 >10,000 cal middle-fine HU-Typ 21 small organic lowland stream <200 10-200 org not relevant HU-Typ 22 medium organic lowland stream <200 100-2,000 org not relevant HR_Type 7b Lowland very large rivers, Sava upper part <200 >10,000 cal >20 RO10 Stream in plain area <200 10-1,000 sil <8 sand, silt RO11 Stream sector in plain area <200 1,000-3,000 sil <1 sand, silt, clay RO12 Stream sector in plain area <200 >3,000 sil 0,5-5 sand, clay RO13 Stream sector with wetlands in plain area <200 >3,000 sil <1 sand, silt UA_ 1C Large rivers, lowland 0-200 1,000-10,000 cal gravel UA_ 1D Very large river, lowland 0-200 ›10,000 cal gravel SI__VR6 Pannonian Sava <400 >2,500 cal permanent SI__VR8 Within-alpine Drava <400 >2,500 sil permanent SI__VR9 Mura and flat-land Drava <400 >2,500 sil permanent

Page 37: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for

Harmonisation of DRB typologies – Annexes

page 37

UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT

ECOREGION 12 PONTIC PROVINCE

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s] RO16 Stream sector in plain area <200 1,000-5,000 sil 0,5-5 Sand, silt RO17 Stream sector in plain area <200 >5,000 sil <1 Sand, silt, clay RO18 Stream sector with wetlands in plain area <200 >5,000 sil <1 Sand, silt, clay

MD_06 stream sector with wetlands in plain area Prut downstream confl Jijia/Nemteni-confl Danube

25-2 27,500 sil 0,1 sand, mud 105000 meander

valley sinuous with side

channels permanent 3,41

BG_TR2 low land, small size river 0-200 >1,000 cal grave, sand permanent BG_TR4 low land, small size river 0-200 >1,000 mixed sand permanent BG_TR5 low land, small size river 0-200 10-1,000 mixed sand permanent BG_TR7 low land, small size river 0-200 >1,000 mixed mud permanent BG_TR8 low land, middle size river 0-200 10-1,000 mixed mud permanent BG_TR9 mid-altitude, middle size river 200-800 10-1,000 mixed stone permanent BG_TR11 mid-altitude, small size river 200-800 10-1,000 cal grave, sand permanent BG_TR12 mid-altitude, middle size river 200-800 >1,000 mixed grave, sand permanent BG_TR13 mid-altitude, middle size river 200-800 10-1,000 mixed grave, sand permanent BG_TR15 alpine, middle size river >1,500 10-1,000 mixed stone permanent

ECOREGION 16 EASTERN PLAINS

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

valley shape channel form

hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s] RO23 Stream in hilly or plateau area 200-500 10-1,000 sil RO24 Stream in plain area <200 10-2,000 sil RO25 Stream sector with wetlands in plain area <200 1,000-5,000 sil RO26 Stream sector in plain area <200 >5,000 sil RO27 Stream sector with wetlands in plain area <200 >5,000 sil

MD_02 stream sector in plain area Prut -Orofteana/Lipcani-confl Solonet-Pruteni 130-45 13,601 sil 0,3 sand, microlithal 83600

meander valley meandering permanent 7,10

MD_03 stream sector with wetlands in plain area Prut conf Solonet/Pruteni-downstream confl Jijia-Nemteni 45-25 16,242 sil 0,2 sand, mud 103000

meander valley

sinuous with side channels permanent 6,9

ECOREGION INDEPENDENT STREAM TYPES

code name (English) altitude

[m] size

[km2] geology sub-ecoregion/bioregion

mean water slope [‰]

mean substratum composition

river discharge

valley shape

channel form hydrology / water flow

Mean anual river

[m3/s]

DE_Type 21 Lake outflows <200,

200-800 10-1,000 sil, cal

RO31 Temporary stream in plateau area 200-500 10-1,000 sil Gravel, sand 5-30

Page 38: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for
Page 39: RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT TOOLS: RIVER ......1. INTRODUCTION In the countries of the Danube River Basin District (DRBD) different stream typologies have independently been developed for