Outils pour traiter les points de vulnérabilité par Olivier Mesly (webinaire du PMI-Montréal)

11

_____ ____ _______ ___ ______ __ _____________Outils pour traiter les points de vulnérabilité

Par Olivier MeslyLe 22 septembre 2016

De 12h00 à 13h00

PMI-Montréal

Note: Aucune partie de cette présentation – texte, images, tableaux, etc. – ne peut être utilisée sans l’autorisation écrite d’Olivier Mesly. Tous droits réservés©.

Olivier Mesly© - Points de vulnérabilité

2

AGENDA

Conférencier - portraitIntroduction

Risques ≠ Points de Vulnérabilité (PDV)Les 4 P du projectQue faire ? - Outils

Conclusion et questions

2


3

CONFÉRENCIERAuteurProfesseur et consultant

3


4

intrants extrants

Transformation

4

UN PROJET


Introduction

5FAISABILITÉ DE PROJETS - ASPECTS OUBLIÉS DE L'ANALYSE PAR OLIVIER MESLY, © 2015 5

PROJET

INNOVATEUR

UNIQUE

IMPLIQUE DES PARTIES PRENANTES

CONTIENT DES DÉFIS TECHNIQUES

DURÉE

BESOIN, OPPORTUNITÉ, IDÉE


UN PROJET


CALENDRIER

DÉFIS COÛTS

CALENDRIER

DÉFIS COÛTS

UN PROJETOlivier Mesly© - Points de vulnérabilité


Gestation

Planification Mobilisation DéploiementRéalisation

et évaluation

Effort

Temps(Inspiré de PMBOK 5)

UN PROJETOlivier Mesly© - Points de vulnérabilité

88

Risques ≠ PDV

So-called “social risks”

identified by the Shi, Q., Liu,

Y., Zuo, J., Pan, N., and Ma, G.

(2015) (p. 489)

Demotivating factors identified1 by Oyedele,

L.O. (2013). Analysis of architects' demotivating

factors in design firms. International Journal of

Project Management 31, 342–354, p. 347

Underlying

Construct

“Social conflicts”

“Poor communication within design teams” (5)

“Poor co-ordination of design teams” (11)

“Uncooperative behaviours of clients/other

project stakeholders” (15)

“Counterproductive behaviours from co-

workers” (23)

“Distrust and dishonesty among design team

members” (38)

Conflicts

“Unfair land compensation”;

“Unfair house demolition

compensation”;

“Inadequate salaries and rewards” (6)

“Inadequate opportunity for career

development/promotion” (14)

Fairness

1 With ranking out of 43 sources of motivation listed by the author.

Olivier Mesly© - Points de

vulnérabilité

99

Risques ≠ PDVOlivier Mesly© -

Points de vulnérabilité

• Conflits sociaux

• Sentiment d’iniquité

1010

Ceci est un risque

van Wyk., R., Bowen, P., and Akintoye, A. (2008). Project risk management practice: The case of a South African utility company. International Journal of Project Management 26, 149–163. The Western Cape Recovery Plan project (pp. 151, 156)

Risk Explanation

“Regulatory risk that encompasses the need for

clear regulatory framework and adequate price

increases to ensure long-term sustainability”

“outsourced information technology service

contract”

“Potential for commissioning delays due to the

rotor from France not being identical to the one

removed to Rosherville”

“Unavailability of Palmiet hydro-electric

supply”

“Fog and mist”

“Extent of consumer adoption of energy

efficiency measures less than expected”


vulnérabilité

1111

Ceci est un risque



vulnérabilité

• Règles• Information extérieure• Fournisseurs extérieurs• Brouillard• Réaction des consommateurs

1212

Ceci est une vulnérabilité


Vulnerability Explanation

“The ongoing ability to maintain consistent

supply”

“Aging plant”

“The ability to respond to changes in the

industry arising from the proposed new

Electricity Supply Industry in South Africa

while meeting the shareholder’s objective

for the company”

“The impact of HIV/AIDS”

“Insufficient numbers of authorized staff

for manual switching operations”

“Poor operational communications”


1313

Ceci est une vulnérabilité



• Habileté à maintenir l’approvisionnement• État de l’usine• Habileté à répondre aux changements• Nombre insuffisant de travailleurs• Communication pauvre

14

RISQUES

RISQUES

socioculturel

environnemental

technologique

marketingorganisationnel

politico-légal

financierFinancier

Politique

Organisationnel

Environnemental

Technologique

Marketing

Légal


vulnérabilité

1515

RISQUES ET VULNÉRABILITÉS

RISQUES

PDV

U (SM)

RISQUES = K / PDV


vulnérabilité

U (SM) – Utilité de la stratégie managériale

1616

RISQUES

PDV

U (SM)

A

B

RISQUES ET VULNÉRABILITÉSOlivier Mesly© -


1717

RISQUES

PDV

U (SM)



1818

RISQUES

PDV

U (DP)



1919

Les 4 P du projet

Plan

Pouvoir

Processus Personnes


vulnérabilité

20

intrants

Plan

Pouvoir

(…)Processus

Personnes

Mécanique

Humain

Les 4 P du projetOlivier Mesly© -


2121

Plan et Processus

Impacts

Produits

BOK

Transformation

Personnes et Pouvoir

Mécanique

HumainPDV

Les 4 P du projetOlivier Mesly© -


22

Exemples de vulnérabilités

Source: Shore (2008, p. 11, 8). Systematic Biases and Culture in Project Failures. Project Management Journal 39(4), 5–16.


vulnérabilité

• Microsoft XBox• Guarde côtière• Navette Columbia• Projet Mars

23

Example Problem

Symptom: psychological

or structural (Project

triangle or 4 P’s)

Microsoft Xbox 360 “Groupthink was also an issue” 1 Psychological

(collaboration)

Coast Guard Maritime

Domain Awareness

Project

“Project leaders succumbed to the

illusion of control bias”2 Psychological (control)

Columbia Shuttle “It was a culture where people were

unwilling to speak up”3

Psychological

(control/collaboration)

Mars Climate Orbiter

and Mars Polar

Lander

“Selective perception… design team,

failed to coordinate with the operational

team at NASA.” 4

Psychological

(perception,

collaboration)

1 Shore (2008, p. 11). 2 Shore (2008, p. 8). 3 Shore (2008, p. 8). 4 Shore (2008, p. 10).


Source: Shore (2008, p. 11, 8). Systematic Biases and Culture in Project Failures. Project Management Journal 39(4), 5–16.


vulnérabilité

24


Source: Winch (2013). Escalation in major projects: Lessons from the Channel Fixed Link. International Journal of Project Management 31, 724–734.

Source: Flyvbjerg (2008). Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. European Planning

Studies16 (1), 3–21.


vulnérabilité

• Aéroport de Denver• Métro de New York• Eurotunnel• FIFA 2014

25


Denver Baggage

Handling “Overconfidence…[and ] the sunk cost”1

Psychological (self) and

structural (costs)

New York City

Subway

Communications

System

“Conservatism, overconfidence, and

illusion of control.” 2

Psychological (self,

perception, control)

Denver International

Airport

“Exceeded the original budget by 200%

and was delivered 16 months over

schedule”3

Structural (budget)

Eurotunnel Average 69% increase in costs 1986 vs.

19944 Structural (costs)

FIFA World Cup

2014 project budget

increased from the

“Originally estimated €1 billion to €11

billion.” 5 Structural (costs)

Merck Vioxx “Sunk cost trap dominated” 6 Structural (costs)

1 Shore (2008, p. 9). 2 Shore (2008, p. 12). 3 Flyvbjerg (2005). 4 Winch (2013). 5 Flyvbjerg (2005). Sure ?? 6 Shore (2008, p. 11).

Source: Winch (2013). Escalation in major projects: Lessons from the Channel Fixed Link. International Journal of Project Management 31, 724–734.

Source: Flyvbjerg (2008). Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. European Planning

Studies16 (1), 3–21.


vulnérabilité

26


Source: Brady and Davies (2010). From hero to hubris – Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow’s Terminal 5. International Journal of Project Management 28, 151–157


vulnérabilité

• Airbus 380• Aéroport Heathrow

27


Airbus A380

“Failed to transform itself from a

balkanized organization into an

integrated company”1

Heathrow Airport T5

(finished on time and

within budget but

with a number of

problems at launch)2

1) troubles locating parked cars

2) Signage problems.

3) baggage handling delays

4) unserviceable escalators

5) electrical problems

6) guidance systems incorrectly

calibrated

7) Failure of the automated temperature

controls.

1 Shore (2008, p. 7). 2 Brady and Davies (2010).

Source: Brady and Davies (2010). From hero to hubris – Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow’s Terminal 5. International Journal of Project Management 28, 151–157


vulnérabilité

28

Source: Dissatisfaction factor on the part of the client as per Yu-Chih Liu, J., and Rizki Yuliani, A. (2016). Differences Between Clients’ and Vendors’ Perceptions of IT Outsourcing Risks: Project Partnering as the Mitigation Approach. Project Management Journal 47(1), 45–58

VULNÉRABILITÉS – aspect humainOlivier Mesly© -


• Appréhension• Confiance• Collaboration• Engagement

29


VULNÉRABILITÉS – aspect humain

Psychological aspect

Dissatisfaction factors Underlying construct 4 P’s

“Inadequate staffing” --- PEOPLE

“Lack of team morale” ---- PEOPLE

“Biased portrayal by the vendor” Apprehension PEOPLE

“Lack of top management support” Collaboration POWER

“Lack of communication between the client and

vendor

Collaboration PROCESS

“Lack of vendor commitment” Commitment PEOPLE

“Lack of active management of the vendor” Commitment POWER

“Conflict between the client and vendor” Conflict PEOPLE

“Lack of experience and expertise with project

activities”

Trust PEOPLE

“Lack of project management know-how” Trust POWER

“Lack of knowledge transfer” Trust PROCESS


vulnérabilité

30

VULNÉRABILITÉS – aspect humain

Oyedele, L.O. (2013). Analysis of architects' demotivating factors in design firms. International Journal of Project Management 31, 342–354


Demotivating factors (examples) #1 Underlying

Construct

4 P’s

“Perceptions of lack of respect among co-

workers” 41 Apprehension

People

“Uncooperative behaviours of

clients/other project stakeholders”; “Poor

communication within design teams”

15, 5 Collaboration

People

“Inadequate commitment among design

teams members” 21 Commitment

People

“Incompatibility of design team

members”; “Unhealthy competition

among co-workers”

12, 14 Conflict

People

1 Out of 43 demotivating factors identified by the authors.


vulnérabilité

31

VULNÉRABILITÉS –aspect humain



vulnérabilité

• Contrôle• Transparence• Équité• Soi

32



“Inept leadership personal behaviours

(e.g. dictatorial, bullying,

Intimidation, etc.)”

8 Control

Power

“Inadequate salaries and rewards” 6 Fairness Process

“The working environment is focused on

negative criticism” 37 Self

Process

“Lack of open interaction between leaders

and subordinates”; “Poor feedback and

inappropriate evaluation system”

17, 19 Transparency

Power



vulnérabilité

33


Escalation determinants as per Meyer, W.G. (2014). The Effect of Optimism Bias on the Decision to Terminate Failing Projects. Project Management Journal 45(4), 7–20


Some escalation determinants Underlying construct 4 P’s

“Optimism and illusion of control” Control Power

“Invulnerability effect” Control Power

“Self-justification” Self ----

“Norms for consistency” Self Process

“Saving face” Self People


vulnérabilité

34


VULNÉRABILITÉS aspect mécaniqueOlivier Mesly© -


• Calendrier• Coûts• Qualité

35


VULNÉRABILITÉS aspect mécanique

Project triangle

Dissatisfaction factors Parameters 4 P’s

“Vendor financial instability” Cost PLAN

“Failure to consider all costs” Costs PLAN

“Lack of documentation management” Quality Process

“Lack of effective development methodology” Quality PROCESS

“Incomplete contracting” Quality PLAN

“Improper definitions of roles and responsibilities” Quality PLAN

“Poor change management” Quality POWER

“Inadequate planning” Quality/Time PLAN

“Requirements misunderstanding (or unclear) Quality… PLAN

“Lack of schedule and budget management” Time, cost PLAN


vulnérabilité

36


Project triangle

Demotivating factors (examples) #1 Parameter

“Working excessively long hours” 9 Time

“Design decisions are dictated by cost and not quality factors” 3 Cost

“Clients demand for radical and high-degree of innovation in

design”; “Frequent design changes/variations” 2, 3 Quality

1 Out of 43 demotivating factors identified by the authors.



vulnérabilité

37


Escalation determinants as per Meyer, W.G. (2014). The Effect of Optimism Bias on the Decision to Terminate Failing Projects. Project Management Journal 45(4), 7–20

Project triangle

Some Escalation determinants Parameter 4 P’s

“Government intervention” Control Power

“Legal implications” Costs Power

“Sunk cost effect” Costs Plan


vulnérabilité

38

VULNÉRABILITÉS – humain et mécanique

Hwang, B.-G., Zhao, X., and Goh, K.J. (2014), p. 704 and demotivating factors (closely associated by us with the work of as per Oyedele, L.O. (2013). Analysis of architects' demotivating

factors in design firms. International Journal of Project Management 31, 342–354.


• Un mélange humain et mécanique

39

VULNÉRABILITÉS – humain et mécanique

Hwang, B.-G., Zhao, X., and Goh, K.J. (2014), p. 704 and demotivating factors (closely associated by us with the work of as per Oyedele, L.O. (2013). Analysis of architects' demotivating

factors in design firms. International Journal of Project Management 31, 342–354.


Demand Nature of problem Potential Demotivating factors (p. 347)1

“Replacement of materials by the client” Technical “Clients demand for radical and high-

degree of innovation in design” (2)

“Obstinate nature of the client” Psychological

“Difficulty in understanding idiosyncratic and tacit needs of clients” (10) “Uncooperative behaviours of clients/other project stakeholders” (15)

“Financial problems faced by the client” Cost ----

“Impediment in prompting the decision making of the client” Psychological/Social ---

“Change in specification by the client” Technical “Unrealistic project demands from

clients” (2, 22) “Inadequate/incomprehensive project objectives by the client”

Cognitive ----

“Change of plans or scope by the client”

Could be many causes ----

1 Survey respondets : 172. Rank out of 43 causes of demotivation.


4040

PROBLÈMES IDENTIFIÉS PAR LES MANAGERS % 4 P

MANQUE D’ENGAGEMENT 59

PERSONNES ET POUVOIRCOMMUNICATION 54

CONFLITS 35

RESSOURCES INSUFFISANTES 69 PROCESSUS

BUTS AMBIGÜS 67

PLANCALENDRIER IRRÉALISTE 63

PLANIFICATION PAUVRE 56

CHANGEMENTS INAPPROPRIÉS 42

Sour

ce: M

ered

ith e

t Man

telé

(200

9)

VULNERABILITÉSOlivier Mesly© -


41

OUTILS

41

• DÉFINITION

• RISQUES ET VULNÉRABILITÉS

• POTENTIEL

• PARAMÈTRES

• BASES DE SUCCÈS ET ERREURS À ÉVITER


vulnérabilité


• Un effort concret • Réalisation d’un résultat unique et innovateur• Répondant à un besoin• A un début et une fin• Implique des personnes • Comporte des défis • A des impacts positifs et possiblement négatifs • Génère une documentation officielle


vulnérabilitéDÉFINITION

45

PROJECT

PEOPLE

PLAN

PROCESSES

POWER

45

Contrôle

Transparence

Équité

Confiance

Collaboration

Engagement



POUVOIR

PROCESSUSPERSONNES

PROJET


AFFINITÉS

BIENVEILLANCE

HABILETÉS

INTÉGRITÉ

CONFIANCE




FLEXIBILITÉ

ÉCHANGE D’INFORMATION

RÉSOLUTION COMMUNE DE PROBLÈMES

ORIENTATION

COOPÉRATION



4848

TECHNIQUE DU CONSENSUS

V

P

M

D

R



FAISABILITÉ DE PROJETS - ASPECTS OUBLIÉS DE L'ANALYSE PAR OLIVIER MESLY, © 2015 49

TECHNIQUE DU PRO

PARAMÈTRESOlivier Mesly© -


FAISABILITÉ DE PROJETS - ASPECTS OUBLIÉS DE L'ANALYSE PAR OLIVIER MESLY, © 2015 50

TECHNIQUE DU SVOR

PARAMÈTRESOlivier Mesly© -


FORCES

VULNÉRABILITÉS

OPPORTUNITÉS

RISQUES


SOURCES

ENCOURAGER DÉCOURAGER

POUVOIR

o Adaptation et flexibilitéo Effort participatifo Qualité de l’informationo Sentiment de sécurité

o Leadership faibleo Manque d’esprit d’équipe

PERSONNES

o L’intégrationo La compétence et

expérienceo La multidisciplinaritéo L’ouverture d’esprit

o La communication pauvreo Les conflitso Les divergences de points de vue o L’absence d’esprit gagnant-

gagnanto Le dénigrement du projet o La résistance aux changements

SUCCÈS ET ERREURSOlivier Mesly© -



SOURCES ENCOURAGER DÉCOURAGER

PROCESSUS o Adhérer au plan initialo L’absence de plan de

contingence

PLAN

o La compréhension mutuelle

o La gestion des objectifs

o Les objectifs irréalisableso La planification déficiente

SUCCÈS ET ERREURSOlivier Mesly© -


53

Questions

Merci !

Olivier Mesly

53

Outils pour traiter les points de vulnérabilité par Olivier Mesly (webinaire du PMI-Montréal)

Career

Transcript of Outils pour traiter les points de vulnérabilité par Olivier Mesly (webinaire du PMI-Montréal)