Isabel Balderas-Marquez, A095 810 160 (BIA June 30, 2011)

8/13/2019 Isabel Balderas-Marquez, A095 810 160 (BIA June 30, 2011)

1/9

Dimuth Amaratunge C.6142 San Lorenzo DriveBuena Park, CA 92620

Name: BALDERAS-MARQUEZ ISABL

US Department of Justice

xecuive Oce r Immgaton Revw

Board of Imigton ApelsOce of the Clek

510 7 l.eesrg l'ike S1e WOFall Cd Vgi 2041

OHS/ICE ice of Chief Counsel - LS606 S live Street 8th FloorLos Angeles CA 90014

A095-810160

Date of this notice: 6/30/2011

Enclosed s a copy of he Boad's decision and od in he above-eenced case.

ncosue

Pan Membes:AdkinsBanch Chas K.Gdbe JoHomes avid B

Sincey,

Donna CaCe Cek

Cite as: Isabel Balderas-Marquez, A095 810 160 (BIA June 30, 2011)


2/9

BALDERAS-MARQUEZ, SABELA# 095-81016062 CVC CENTER PLAZASANTA ANA CA 92701

Name: BALDERASMARQUEZ ISABEL

US Deprmen f Jusie

Executve Oce r Immigration Review

Board of Immigation AppealsOce of the Clek

5/07 l.esbrg Pk, Suit 00Fll C11rc1 Vrna 2204

OHS/ICE ffice of Chief Counsel LS606 S. ive Street 8th FloorLos Angeles CA 90014

A095-810160

Date of this notice: 6302011

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decsio n te above-refeeced case. Ths copy s begpovded to you as a cotesy Your attoey o repesenatve as bee seved wth thsdecsio psuant o 8 CFR 1292S(a) I the ataced decso oders that you be removedom te Unied tates or ams a mmgato Jdges decson oderng a you beremoved, any petton review o e ataced decsion mus be fed wt and eceed by teappoprae co of appeals within 0 days o he date of e decision

Enclosue

Pane Membes:Adkins-Blanch Chars K.Guendesberge JohnHolmes David B.

Sincerely,

Donna CarChief Clek



3/9


4/9

09 0 60

Considering is reord as a whoe we onlude ha e resonden did no i o aea a ereaingSee erez v Muksey, supr; Jerezno v INS supr. Consequenly we nd i aoriaeto emand e eord o he Immigraion Judge o rovide he resonden wih a new earing

Acordingly he owing order will be eneredORDER he resondens apea is susained he respondens removal roceedings are

reoened and he reord is remanded o e Immigaion Judge r her proeedings onsisenwith e regoing decision

2



5/9

UNITED SATES DPARM OF JSC

XV OC OR MMGRO RVW

MMGRATO COR

60 SOTH OLVE S., lH

M H C ARAG 42 S ORZO DRV

BA AK CA 900

MR O

BARA-QZ SA

LOS GLES CA 90014

A 95-8

_ U O ORWAR O DRSS PROVDDDA: un 3, 70:c

T CHED S A F DECSO O MMGRO DG S A S S D WH H BOR O MMGATO

H CADR )AY O HE DATE O H MG O HS WRT SOS COSE OR D SRCOS FOR ROR RAG YO APPEL.O OCE O APA AACHD DOCMS FE OR E AVER QUSMS B D TO OARD O MMGRAO AES

OC O H CRK

PO BO 85

ALLS CHRCH VA 224

AACD S A COPY O TH DCSO OF E MGO JDGE AS THE STOF OR FAR O AAR A OR SCHEDD ORAO OR RMOVA EARG

S DCSO l SS A MOO O REOE S ED CCONCE SCO (c) ( O THE MMGRO AOA A , 8 SCO 252B) (3) I DPORAO ROCEDGS OR SCO 20 )8 SC SECO 122a(c) RMOVA PROCGS O MOTOO REOE OR MOTO MS BE F S COR

MMGRAO COR

0 SO OV S 5TH

' :CC

H . K MMGO CO


6/9

UNITED STATES DEPARTMEN OF JSTC

XECUVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGION REVIW

UNIE STATES MGRTO COUR

LOS AGS, CALIFO&'lA

Fe Nuber A 95 81 16

n the tter o

BLDERS-QUEZ

sabe

espondent

)))))))))

N REMOVAL ROCEENGS

CHAE: ecton 22()(6)(A)() of the rton nd Ntonty Act (Act) -- Present in the United States without being admted or parole

ACTON: oton to eopen.

ON EHLF O SONENT

Duth Artune Esqre642 n orenzo Driveuen Prk, C 9262

ON EHAL O THE OVMENTMot GsorAssstnt Chef ConseDeprtent o Hoend ecurty66 outh Ove treet, 8th FoorLos Anees, C 94

DCSION ND ORDR O HE MMTION JDE

. rocedura Historespondent s sbe BALDEA-AQUEZ. On October 29, 29, the Goveent

persony erved espondent th For -862 Notce to Apper (NTA) ee Exh .

eov proceedns coenced nd jursdcton vested hen the Goveent ed the NT Ath he Cort on Deceber , 29 d.; so 8 CF 34()(29) n the NTA,the Goveent eed tht espondent, ntve nd ctzen o Mexco, entered the ntedttes t or ner n Ysro, , on n ow dte nd te n 992 d. TheGoveet rther eed tht espondent ws not dtted or proed er nspecton by nrto Ocer d. Accordny, the Goveent chred Respondent th ndssbtypursunt o secton 22()(6)(A)() o the Act. d


7/9

n December 8 00, the Cur sered Respndent b reulr ml wth tce fern rdern her t pper bere the mmrtn Cu n Februy . S Exh. .

n Februry , 00, Respndent nd Respnden's cunsel led t pper r herschedued hen. he Cur prceeded n enti nd und Respndent remvble by cer,cnvncn, nd unequvc evdence bsed n the Gveen's submssn f F 13Recrd f Deprble/ndmssble Alen See Exh 3; see ls NA (b(5(A The Curdered Respndent remved t Mexc bsed n the chre cntned n he TA

n Febu 17, 0 I 0 Respnden ed he pendn mt t een n he mtn,se rues h her ure t pper n Februr , , ws due exceptn crcumsces.Speccly, Respndent sers ht her duher's llness, d her msplcemen f the tcefern, cused tw-hur dey n vn t he Cut. Respndent's cunse cntends hhs lue ppe ws due t csn en rute t he hen

n Mch 1, 01, the veen ed bref n ppstn t Respndents mnt repen run h Respndent hs n esblshed tht her lure t pper ws due exceptn crcumstnces n Mrch 1 0 espnden led reply the veentsbref n ppstn, ressern the cm h the tlty f he crcumstnces suundn herure ppe cnsttute exceptnl crcumnces

Fr the lwn resns, Respnden's mtn t repen wll be dened

Law and nalyi

An in seni remv rder my be rescnded by he Cut upn mn repened whn 18 dys er the de the rder f remv he respndent denstrtes hthe ure t pper ws becuse f exceptn crcumsnces. 8 CF.R 10(b4(xceptn crcumstnces re dened s "exceptnl crcumstces (such s bttey r exremecruety t the en r y chld r pren f the len, serus lness f the en, r seriusllness r deth f he spuse, chld, r prent f the len, bu t ncn ss cmpencrcumsnces bynd he ctrl f the len IA (e(

In detenn whether the respndent's bsence ws due t exceptn crcumstces,the Cu must lk the "ttlty f the crcumsnces Mter fW-F-, & Dec 5(A Mter f Shaar, N Dec 5 (A 1. Speccly, the Cur must lk the pcurzed cts presented n the cse See Sh v INS, 8 Fd 55 (th Cr 1Fnly, mn repen bsed n exceptn crcumstces mus be suppred b specc,detled evdence cbe the cm CesCstel v. Ashcrof, 8 Fd 888, 8 (th1 The Cou notes ha Responen does no claim ha her lure o appear was aece by her counse's ure oappea. Hoever, Responen's counsel proe ocumena evence o suppot his ca ha s faure oappear as ue o a vecle coson

2


8/9

Cir. 202).

Here, Respondenargues hat reopening sappropriat becase she wasfredo atendtoher sckdaugher several tmes en roue oheCou. See Responden's Declaaion. AccordngoResondent, her daugher sufered omthe and had a severe temperare. IdFheore, Respondent states tha she arived a the our approxmaely two hors laebecase she lost he Noce of Heang, which conaned he proper address of the ImmgraionCot Id. Respden conends that she told her end o ae her to the mmgraon o o"Los Angeles Sree Id She caims tha a 25 p., her atoey caled her and ied herha he had been invoved n a collsion ad tha she shold no e jdge of he acciden adreqes a connace Id was en a a sec gad ed her she was no a egon o . She cams ha she caed her aoey and adsd hm of whahappened Id ounse then od her of he proper address ad dreced her o in themion Jdge of wha had occued Id Responden saes ha aer she solice direciosom ous peope, she aied a he o a 2:3 pm and spoe o a secrity gard who

ined er ha the udge had ished his hearngs r the day d ha here was nohing shecould do d

In he presen maer, Responde has no estabished ha "exceponal crcmsacessemming om her daugher's llness he moing of he hearng cased her absence on he daeof er schedued heang Generally, f a alen claims ha e llness of himself or a closefamy member preented hm om aendng a schedle heng, he aen shold providedocuenay evdece o subsaniae he claim. See Celis-Castallano 28 F3d at 8 (alen'sac of eidence regadng he seery of hs asha aac rsrics the ou's abiliy odeene f he llness was exceptional) Moreoer he ourt can consder wheher he alienoied e out of the reason r hs absence Id. consderaion of alien's ire o no

Immigon o of he reason r his absence was no improper

Whle Respondents consel sresses that t wod hae been mpossibe o obin ayrecords prior o her heang, Respondent cold have obaed medcal records or docmenaoo cooborae her daugher's illness aer the heang Addtionally; he record does no reecha Responde noted the ou of he reason of h absec Rspoen gae no explaaonr eglecing o conac he Immigraon our on the day of he heang. Moreove Respondendd o sppo her clam wih medca records or oher eidence, such as adais b personswh owedge regardng he exen ad seosness of Respondes dagher's llness ad heremedies she sed o rea i See Mater of JP- 22 & Dec 33 BIA 8) AhoghResponden ams hat a security gard at he ou saed ha here was nothng she cold dowhen asked if she cold meet wh the dge or anoher member of the or, here were ohera aenes of communcaion wh the ou tha could hae been taen

ve he ac of eidence o demonsrae he severty of her daughers scknessResponden faled o show ha her lure o appear was due o excepional circmstances

3


9/9

,

Furthermore Respondent assers ha she mispaced o he Notice o Hearng causng herto become ost and preventing her om appearng bere the our on tme However thscircumsance does not rise o the ee o eceptiona circustances whin he eanng o heAct Preimnary Respondent adits ha she had vsted the our on previous occasions andtherere shoud have known he vcnty o the our See Respondents ecration 3Athough Respondents previous visits seems to have been to he Detaned ou her consionoer the ocaton o he our and subsequen untmey appearance is not an "eceptonacircumstnce. Respondent had mpe te between receiing her Notce o Hearing ad theschedued hearing to become iiar wih he address o the ort Athough she discoveredthat she mispaced the notice when she aved n downown Los ngees her decarationndicates that she had access to a phone whch Responden shoud he utiied in order toco the ocation o he ourt Accordingy the circustaces eadng to Respondentsire o apper were not beyond her conro nd do not consttute "exceptiona circumstanceswithin the enng o the Act

sty the ou notes that neither Respondent nor Respondents conse aempted tooi the o o ther tardiness or inabity o appear The record reects that athough herheng as schedued r 12:30 pm the mmigraton Judge generousy gae her unti the endo his ster caendar to apper i cour t was not unt I :30 pm. tha Responden ws orderedremoed bset Snce no ers were made to noi the ourt o the abovementionedcrcstces the our propery proceeded bset

Therere the ou nds that Respondent has not e her burden in estabishing haexctiona crcumstances prevented her om appearing at her Febru 9 2010, hearing

Accordingy he owing order w be entered:

ORER

T S HEREY ODERED that Respondents motion to reopen is DEED

DTE: b (zl

1 h/.OuCMNr WASEtDBY:

. [L) [ l SNALSVC(P)T: [ lALIEN ( l ALINEc/oCustdiaOfer

(J'SAT/EDAT: BCUR

Atchmen: JEOIR-3 EOIR28

L IScUs ( JOe

avid Anderon

IMMTO JUDE

Isabel Balderas-Marquez, A095 810 160 (BIA June 30, 2011)

Documents

Transcript of Isabel Balderas-Marquez, A095 810 160 (BIA June 30, 2011)