C 761 ACTA - Oulu
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of C 761 ACTA - Oulu

UNIVERSITY OF OULU P .O. Box 8000 F I -90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND
A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S O U L U E N S I S
University Lecturer Tuomo Glumoff
University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen
Postdoctoral researcher Jani Peräntie
University Lecturer Anne Tuomisto
University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen
Planning Director Pertti Tikkanen
Professor Jari Juga
University Lecturer Anu Soikkeli
University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen
Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala
ISBN 978-952-62-2720-7 (Paperback)ISBN 978-952-62-2721-4 (PDF)ISSN 0355-3213 (Print)ISSN 1796-2226 (Online)
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
OULU 2020
C 761
Nizar Abou Zaki
THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE EXPANSION IN WATER RESOURCES DEPLETIONIN CENTRAL IRAN
UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL;UNIVERSITY OF OULU,FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY
C 761
AC
TAN
izar Abou Z
aki
C761etukansi.fm Page 1 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:27 AM


ACTA UNIVERS ITAT I S OULUENS I SC Te c h n i c a 7 6 1
NIZAR ABOU ZAKI
THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE EXPANSION IN WATER RESOURCES DEPLETION IN CENTRAL IRAN
Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent ofthe Doctoral Training Committee of Technology andNatural Sciences of the University of Oulu for publicdefence in the OP auditorium (L10), Linnanmaa, on 15October 2020, at 1 p.m.
UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2020

Copyright © 2020Acta Univ. Oul. C 761, 2020
Supervised by
Professor Bjørn Kløve
Doctor Ali Torabi Haghighi
Doctor Pekka Rossi
Reviewed byDoctor Saeed GolianDoctor Pennan Chinnasamy
ISBN 978-952-62-2720-7 (Paperback)ISBN 978-952-62-2721-4 (PDF)
ISSN 0355-3213 (Printed)ISSN 1796-2226 (Online)
Cover DesignRaimo Ahonen
PUNAMUSTA
TAMPERE 2020
OpponentDoctor Hamed Ketabchi

Abou Zaki, Nizar, The role of agriculture expansion in water resources depletion incentral Iran. University of Oulu Graduate School; University of Oulu, Faculty of TechnologyActa Univ. Oul. C 761, 2020University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland
AbstractIn arid and semi-arid regions, water is considered as the main resource for agriculture and thereforefor the mainstay of rural societies. In this study, agricultural water usage sustainability in FarsProvince, Zayanderud and Bakhtegan Basins, in central Iran was evaluated. The study areas havewitnessed a depletion in main river flows and groundwater levels, directly affecting the watersecurity and the well-being on the local inhabitants. Available and developed drought indicators suchas: Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Stream Drought Index (SDI), Overall AgriculturalDrought Index (OADI) and Agricultural Drought Index (ADI) were used. This indicators in additionto remote sensed and in-situ data were used to monitor the water depletion in these areas. Resultsindicated that both Fars and Zayanderud went through three sustainability water usage stages duringa period of 40 year: 1) a sustainable phase, where the water usage matched the water renewabilitycapacity; 2) a transition phase, where water usage occasionally exceeds the water renewabilitycapacity; 3) an unsustainable phase, where there is a lack and depletion in water resources foragriculture and domestic usage. Climatically there was no significant distribution of meteorologicaldrought, and no negative trends in the annual precipitation, in Fars and Zayanderud. A hyper-aridclimate prevailed for an average of 32 percent of the Fars province spatio-temporal coverage duringthe study period. The area increased significantly from 30.6 percent in the first decade, 1977 till 1986to 44.4 percent in the last decade, 2007–2016. In Zayanderud the hyper-arid cold climate wasdominant in the study period, with an average 57.5 percent frequency of occurrence. Most of theyears, 86 percent of the period from 1977 till 2016, are considered to be wet and normal yearsmeteorologically, and the climatic diversity remained constant with no significant negative trend inFars. In contrary, the hydrological drought occurrence increased significantly from 30 to 73 percentof the years, especially after the 1980s when the irrigation expanded and 60 percent of the rainfedareas were converted to irrigated areas. This exerted a substantial pressure on surface andgroundwater resources for irrigation purposes, led to groundwater depletion in major aquifers in Farsand Zayanderud, reaching 50 meters in some aquifers, and zero flow in the downstream of mainrivers. This decrease in the downstream flow of the Zayanderud and Kor Rivers led to the decreasein the surface volume of Gavkhuni Wetland and Bakhtegan Lake. The wetland and the lake reachedto complete dryness in several occasion, exerting pressure on the environment and surroundingecology. The increase in water pressure and the depletion of its resources led to the decrease in theirrigated areas to half, after the farms doubled the irrigated areas in the 1990s. The remote senseddata confirmed this results were the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and theGlobal Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) derived data showed the total water massdepletion in the Zayanderud and Bakhtegan Basins, and the groundwater levels depletion inBakhtegan. GRACE data showed an average water mass monthly depletion of 32 millimeters (mm)in Zayanderud and 17.5 mm in Bakhtegan. The Normalized Water Difference Index (NDWI),confirmed the surface area depletion in the Gavkhuni Wetland reaching total dryness in the year 2009onwards. As a main conclusion, the increase in the hydrological and agricultural droughts occurrencein Fars and Zayanderud seem to be directly related to human farming activities, even with theoccurrence of meteorological droughts.
Keywords: Bakhtegan, depletion, drought indices, drought severity, Fars, Gavkhuni, groundwater,remote sensing, river flow, water management, Zayanderud


Abou Zaki, Nizar, Maatalouden laajentumisen rooli Iranin keskiosien vesivarojenehtymisessä.
Oulun yliopiston tutkijakoulu; Oulun yliopisto, Teknillinen tiedekunta
Acta Univ. Oul. C 761, 2020
Oulun yliopisto, PL 8000, 90014 Oulun yliopisto
Tiivistelmä
Kuivilla seuduilla vesi on maanviljelyn tärkein resurssi ja siten myös maalaisyhteisöjen tukipila-
ri. Tässä tutkimuksessa arvioitiin Iranin keski- ja eteläosissa sijaitsevien Farsin provinssin sekä
Zayanderudin ja Bakhteganin valuma-alueiden maatalouden veden käytön kestävyyttä. Tutki-
musalueiden suurimpien jokien virtaamat ja pohjaveden tasot ovat ehtyneet, mikä vaikuttaa suo-
raan vedensaantiin ja paikallisten asukkaiden hyvinvointiin. Näillä alueilla veden ehtymistä seu-
rattiin olemassa olevilla ja kehitetyillä kuivuusindekseillä keräämällä dataa sekä kaukokartoituk-
sella että paikan päällä. Tuloksi havaittiin, että tutkimusalueilla ollaan käyty läpi kolme veden
kulutuksen vaihetta neljänkymmenen vuoden aikana: 1) Kulutusta kestävä vaihe, jolloin veden
käyttö oli suhteessa veden uusiutumiskapasiteettiin; 2) Siirtymävaihe, jolloin veden käyttö toisi-
naan ylittää veden uusiutumiskapasiteettiin; 3) Kestämätön vaihe, jolloin on vesivaroissa on
puutetta ja maatalouden ja kotitalouksien käyttöön varojen ehtyessä. Ilmastollisesti tutkimusalu-
eilla ei ollut merkittäviä säännöllisiä kuivuuskausia, eikä negatiivisia trendejä vuosittaisessa
sademäärissä. Suurin osa tarkastelluista vuosista 1977–2016 oli joko kosteita tai normaaleita
ilmastotieteellisessä mielessä. Ilmaston monimuotoisuus pysyi Farsissa tutkimusaikana muuttu-
mattomana, eikä siinä havaittu merkittäviä negatiivisia trendejä. Hydrologinen kuivuus kuiten-
kin lisääntyi merkittävästi eritoten 1980-luvun jälkeen, kun keinokastelu lisääntyi ja 60 prosent-
tia sadekastelun varassa olleista alueista muunnettiin keinokastelluiksi. Tämä aiheutti merkittä-
vää painetta pinta- ja pohjavesivaroihin, mikä johti pohjavesien ehtymiseen suurissa pohjavesi-
varannoissa Farsissa ja Zayanderudissa, sekä suurimpien jokien alavirtojen tyrehtymiseen. Tut-
kimusalueen Zayanderud- ja Kor-jokien alavirtojen valunnan väheneminen johti Gavkhunin
suon ja Bakhtegan-järven pinta-alojen pienenemiseen. Suo ja järvi kuivuivat useaan otteeseen
kokonaan, tuottaen suurta painetta ympäristölle ja ympäröivälle ekologialle. Veden käyttöpai-
neen kohoaminen ja alueen resurssien ehtyminen johtivat kasteltujen alueiden vähenemiseen
maatilojen lisättyä kasteltuja alueita 1990-luvulla. Kaukokartoituksella kerätty data vahvistaa
nämä löydöt. Painovoimaan perustuvalla GRACE-satelliitilla kerätty data osoitti Zayanderudin
ja Bakhteganin valuma-alueiden kokonaisvesimassan ehtymisen ja pohjaveden ehtymisen Bakh-
teganissa. Vesi-indeksitarkastelu (NDWI) vahvisti sekä Gavkhunin suon, että Bakhtegan-järven
pinta-alojen pienenemisen. Johtopäätelmänä tutkimuksesta oli, että vaikka alueella on ajoittaisia
kuivuuskausia, hydrologisen ja maataloudellisen kuivuuden esiintymisen lisääntyminen Farsissa
ja Zayanderudisda näyttää olevan suorassa yhteydessä ihmisten maanviljelytoimintaan.
Asiasanat: Bakhtegan, Fars, Gavkhuni, jokivirta, kaukokartoitus, kuivuusaste,kuivuusindeksit, pohjavesi, veden ehtyminen, vesivarojen hallinta, Zayanderud


Для моїх рідних

8

9
Acknowledgements
First I would like to thank Maa-ja vesitekniikan tuki ry (MVTT), University of
Oulu Graduate School, and Olvi Foundation for their continued financial support
during my doctoral studies. This life changing experience in Oulu would have never
been possible without their support.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation for my principle
supervisor, Professor Bjørn Kløve, and my co-supervisors Dr. Ali Torabi Haghighi
and Dr. Pekka Rossi, for their support, patience and motivation during my doctoral
studies. Thank you for making me feel a part of the family rather than the classical
supervisor-student relationship. I would like to express my appreciation to my
follow-up group members Dr. Hannu Marttila and Dr. Anna-Kaisa Ronkanen for
guiding and supporting me during my doctoral studies. A special thanks for all my
colleagues at the Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering research unit. I
will always remember our individual talks in the coffee room, our mökki trips, and
our nights out in Oulu.
This thesis would have never been completed without the contribution of Dr.
Mary McAfee who checked the language of my thesis and articles, and ACTA
editor Dr. Jani Peräntie who carefully reviewed every detail in this thesis.
Furthermore I would like to thank Dr. Saeed Golian and Dr. Pennan Chinnasamy
for their efforts in pre-examining this thesis. A special thanks for my opponent Dr.
Hamed Ketabchi for his time in reviewing my work.
Last, but definitely not least, I want to thank my family: My mom Olha, my
father Issam, my sister Natalia, my brother-in-law Wassim, and my nephews Samir
and Ziad. This will have never been possible without you being a part of my life.
Thank you for all the times you were next to me, especially when I was going
through the worse period of my life. Thanks for your long phone calls and support,
and most importantly, thank you for believing in me. Mom and Dad I am always at
a loss of words when I want to describe my heartfelt appreciation for all what you
have done for me in my life…
20th of August 2020 Nizar Abou Zaki

10

11
Abbreviations
HIF Humidity influence factor
TIF Thermal influence factor
CIF Climate influence factor
OADI Overall agricultural drought index
ADI Agricultural drought index
AI Aridity index
SPI Standardized precipitation index
SDI Streamflow drought index
NDWI Normalized difference water index
NDVI Normalized difference vegetation index
GRACE Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
NIR Near-infrared spectroscopy GLADS Global Land Data Assimilation System

12

13
List of original publications
This thesis is based on the following publications, which are referred throughout
the text by their Roman numerals:
I Abou Zaki, N., Haghighi, A.T., Rossi, P.M., Tourian, M.J, & Kløve, B. (2019). Monitoring groundwater storage depletion using gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) data in Bakhtegan catchment, Iran. Water 11(7), 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071456
II Abou Zaki, N., Haghighi, A. T., Rossi, P. M., Tourian, M. J., Bakhshaee, A., & Kløve, B. (2020). Evaluating impacts of irrigation and drought on river, groundwater and a terminal wetland in the Zayanderud basin, Iran. Water, 12(5), 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051302
III Haghighi, A.T., Abou Zaki, N., Rossi, P.M., Noori, R., Hekmatzadeh, A.A., Saremi, H. & Kløve, B. (2020). Unsustainability syndrome – from meteorological to agricultural drought in arid and semi-arid regions. Water 12(3), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030838
The author’s contribution to Papers I–III:
I Elaborated the research plan with Ali Torabi Haghighi and Pekka Rossi, performed the analyses and evaluated the results, and wrote the manuscript. Responded to comments from the co-authors and reviewers.
II Elaborated the research plan with Ali Torabi Haghighi and Pekka Rossi, performed the analyses and evaluated the results, and wrote the manuscript. Responded to comments from the co-authors.
III Elaborated the research plan with Ali Torabi Haghighi, contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing, and commented on all versions of the manuscript.

14

15
Contents
Abstract
Tiivistelmä
Acknowledgements 9
Abbreviations 11
List of original publications 13
Contents 15
1 Introduction 17
1.1 Overview ................................................................................................. 17
1.2 Remote sensing applications in hydrology .............................................. 19
1.3 Thesis objectives and hypothesis ............................................................ 20
2 Study area and data used 23
2.1 Water resources in Iran ............................................................................ 23
2.2 Fars province ........................................................................................... 24
2.3 Bakhtegan basin ...................................................................................... 27
2.4 Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province ................................................... 28
3 Methods 31
3.1 Climate variability analysis using the Emberger method ........................ 31
3.2 Analysis of metrological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts ......... 34
3.3 Using Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) to monitor
the fluctuation in surface area of Gavkhuni wetland and Lake
Bakhtegan ............................................................................................... 36
3.4 Monitoring total water mass depletion in Zayanderud and
Bakhtegan basins, and groundwater depletion in Bakhtegan
basin, using GRACE data ....................................................................... 38
4 Results 41
4.1 Spatiotemporal climate variability in Fars province and in
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province ...................................................... 41
4.1.1 Fars province ................................................................................ 41
4.1.2 Zayanderud basin ......................................................................... 42
4.2 Monitoring meteorological drought in Fars province ............................. 44
4.3 Monitoring hydrological drought in Fars province ................................. 47
4.4 Monitoring meteorological and hydrological drought in
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province ...................................................... 50
4.5 Monitoring the transformation from rainfed to irrigated farming
in Fars province ....................................................................................... 51

16
4.6 Monitoring groundwater depletion in Fars province and
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province ...................................................... 54
4.6.1 Fars province ................................................................................ 54
4.6.2 Zayanderud basin .......................................................................... 54
4.7 Monitoring surface area change in Gavkhuni wetland using
Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) ......................................... 57
4.8 Monitoring total water storage depletion in Zayanderud and
Bakhtegan basins using GRACE data ..................................................... 60
4.9 Monitoring groundwater depletion in Bakhtegan basin using
GRACE data ........................................................................................... 62
5 Discussion 65
5.1 Fars province ........................................................................................... 65
5.2 Zayanderud basin .................................................................................... 67
5.3 Gavkhuni wetland area ............................................................................ 68
5.4 Bakhtegan basin ...................................................................................... 69
6 Conclusions and further research 71
List of references 75
Original publications 83

17
1 Introduction
1.1 Overview
Globally, the 20th century witnessed major developments in irrigation systems and
schemes, with approximately 53 million hectares in 1900 expanding to 285 million
hectares by 2000 (Wisser, Fekete, Vörösmarty, & Schumann, 2010). This
development has contributed to world food security, especially in arid and semi-
arid climate zones, as irrigated areas comprise 17% of total cropped land but
provide 40% of global agricultural production (Li & Troy, 2018). However, water
resources have decreased over the same period, which is evident as reduced river
flows and groundwater levels (Famiglietti, 2014; Konikow, 2011; Wada et al.,
2010). Extensive development of irrigation in arid regions has also resulted in
higher pollution and contamination, waterlogging, and salinity (Ghumman,
Ghazaw, Niazi, & Hashmi, 2011).
Sustainable water management is defined as the ability to meet current water
needs without compromising the water needs of future generations Poff et al., 2016;
Marino, Pernice, Marra, & Caruso, 2016). Achieving this requires an approach
addressing technical, environmental, economic, and social issues (Ong, Tan, Ng,
Yong, & Chai, 2016). The sustainable yield concept is defined as the rate of water
exploitation without endangering water quantity or quality (Yari, 2016).
Sustainable yield is estimated for every aquifer, and varies according to the
hydrogeological conditions (Chartzoulakis, 2015). Sustainable management of
aquifers in arid zones requires accurate data on recharge rates of groundwater
resources, however such data are often lacking for developing countries (Abou Zaki,
Haghighi, Rossi, Xenarios, & Kløve, 2018). When long term groundwater
abstraction exceeds long term groundwater recharge rates, overexploitation or
persistent groundwater depletion can occur (Doell, Mueller Schmied, Schuh,
Portmann, & Eicker, 2014). This can result in a decline in groundwater levels,
which can have devastating effects on natural streamflow in groundwater-fed
wetlands and related ecosystems (Davranche et al., 2015). Many well-known
hotspots of groundwater depletion have already appeared world-wide, including
Ogallala in USA (Wada et al., 2012), North-East China (Wada et al., 2012), Iran
(Khaki, 2020), Yemen (Taher et al., 2012), South-East Spain (Martínez Aldaya et
al., 2019), and Northwest India (Chen, Li, Zhang, & Ni, 2014).

18
Estimates indicate that the intensity and frequency of droughts in arid and
semi-arid climate zones are increasing due to climate change (Dashtpagerdi et al.,
2015). Research has confirmed that unsustainable usage of water resources leads
to increasing drought impacts (Cooley, Donnelly, Phurisamban, & Subramanian,
2015; Van Loon & Van Lanen, 2013). The overexploitation of water resources is
directly linked with decrease in precipitation volume, increase in temperature,
decreases in river flow (Wen, Rogers, Ling, & Saintilan, 2011), groundwater level
depletion (Castle et al., 2014), and ultimately decreases in irrigated farmed area
(Paper III). These factors increase the severity of droughts, as less water is available
to compensate water shortage during drought period.
Unlike other natural disasters, drought can affect large areas for a relatively
long time (Nafarzadegan et al., 2012). Droughts are characterized by an unexpected
reduction in precipitation volume (Shahabfar & Eitzinger, 2011), which can lead to
major economic and social challenges, especially in rural areas (Joshi, 2019).
Water-dependent sectors such as agriculture are critically impacted by droughts,
lowering crop yield (Karami & Keshavarz, 2010). There are four types of drought:
meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, and socioeconomic (Mishra & Singh,
2010). Meteorological drought occurs when there is a severe decrease in
precipitation volume (Xu, Wang, Zhao & Yang, 2018). Hydrological drought
occurs when there is a decrease in stream and reservoir discharge (Abdi, Shirvani,
& Buchroithner, 2019). Agricultural drought refers to the depletion of surface,
groundwater, and soil moisture levels due to overexploitation of water resources
for agricultural activities (Huang et al., 2015). Socioeconomic drought refers to the
societal, economic, and environmental impacts of the three other types of drought
(Guo et al., 2019). In arid and semi-arid climate zones, meteorological drought is
the trigger for the other drought types. Agricultural drought and socioeconomic
drought occur when usage of water resources exceeds the volume of renewable
surface and groundwater resources. There has been considerable progress in
understanding the impacts of drought in terms of engineering, economics, social
science, and geography, but the links between human activities and droughts still
need more investigation. In areas with a high dependency on agriculture, these links
are more complicated, as they affect the livelihoods of rural inhabitants.
Identification of the relationships between different types of drought could lead to
improvements in strategies for overcoming social challenges caused by droughts.
Understanding these links could also reveal the factors that determine the transition
from sustainability to unsustainability in water resources systems (Paper III).

19
1.2 Remote sensing applications in hydrology
Remote sensing monitoring of agriculture has been employed for various
applications, e.g., detection of land use change, yield production, irrigation, and
vegetation type (Kussul, Lavreniuk, Skakun, & Shelestov, 2017). Published
literature reflects increasing interest in remote sensing in agricultural research
(Weiss, Jacob, & Duveiller, 2020). This increased research has been enabled by
advances in relevant technologies, including sensors, spatial, temporal, and spectral
capacities, Nano-satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Remote sensing
data have been used to date in monitoring crop canopy temperature, soil moisture,
evapotranspiration rate, crop density, and crop height (Zhao, Yang, Li, Zhao, &
Zhang, 2016; Huang, Qiang, Jianxia, Guoyong, & Li, 2015; Salamí, Barrado, &
Pastor, 2014). In combination, such data give farmers the ability to optimize
irrigation and water management schemes. This is important in arid and semi-arid
climate zones where precipitation volume is low, especially in the dry season, and
where irrigation water is used to compensate for precipitation shortages.
Remote sensing approaches have also been used for monitoring hydrological
variables and estimating hydrological model parameters (Tang, Gao, Lu, &
Lettenmaier, 2009). Remote sensing data obtained from various satellites covering
different spectral bands provide information on different catchment characteristics,
which can be used as parameters in hydrological models (Khan et al., 2010; Dabral,
Baithuri, & Pandey, 2008). Combining these data with other spatial information,
such as digital terrain and elevation models, allows spatial estimation of
hydrological model parameters. Remote sensing gives the ability to acquire data
for remote areas, where data are otherwise difficult to acquire due to accessibility
challenges and due to associated high costs. Remote sensing provides an
understanding of hydrological parameters by covering the whole globe. This is
important for the development of global hydrological models to forecast climate
change, floods, and weather conditions (Stisen, Jensen, Sandholt, & Grimes, 2008).
Historically, hydrological models have been data-limited, as all such models are
calibrated on observed data such as rainfall, runoff, and evaporation rates.
Remote sensing can be used for assessing watershed priority evaluation
problems, management requirements, and periodic monitoring (Butt, Shabbir,
Ahmad, & Aziz, 2015). Data on watershed characteristics, including area, size,
geometrical shape, topography, drainage pattern, and land forms, can be obtained
by remote sensing. The near infra-red (NIR), is a method that makes use of the near
infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum (from 700 to 2500 nanometers).

20
By measuring the light scattered off and through a sample, this bands differ between
land and water, so remote sensing of these differences helps in mapping river
drainage and lake area changes, while differences in the red band help differentiate
between vegetated and non-vegetated areas (Hunt et al., 2010). Remote sensing can
also be used to monitor components of hydrological models, e.g., precipitation
volume can be obtained from weather radar (Chen et al., 2014). Elevation changes
in the land surface can be detected by airborne laser altimeters, which provide data
on topography, stream channel cross-section, soil surface roughness, and vegetation
height. Soil degradation, salinity, alkalinity, erosion, and desertification can be
evaluated by remote sensing measures (Hereher, & Ismael, 2016; Lamchin et al.,
2016).
Remote sensing has also proven to be a good tool for monitoring surface and
groundwater resources. Data from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
(GRACE) mission satellites can be used to measure spatial and temporal variations
in the gravitational field, which can be used to estimate changes in groundwater
storage level (Landerer & Swenson, 2012). The normalized difference water index
(NDWI) monitors variations in the reflectance of surface water bodies, which can
be used to detect any changes in lakes and wetlands (Jawak & Luis, 2014). These
tools can provide a time series for measured parameters, as the analyst can
extrapolate data for any previous time frame. This helps in obtaining data for
remote areas, but also in filling data gaps and overcoming data shortages. As
hydrological data is essential for arid and semi-arid climatic zones, remote sensing
may provide needed data for the development of water management goals and
strategies. When understood and used correctly, remote sensing data can be an
important tool in such climate zones, especially following recent advances in
technology and research in the remote sensing field.
1.3 Thesis objectives and hypothesis
With the world’s growing population, especially in arid and semi-arid zones,
expansion of irrigated agriculture is a solution to maintain food security in these
areas. Agriculture is the main economic activity of arid and semi-arid communities,
making water management policies important for this sector, as an increase in the
irrigated area increases the stress on the water supply.
Water management in arid and semi-arid regions faces the challenge of
matching supply and demand, as the precipitation volume is already low. To face
the water demand challenges, water management systems must consider three main

21
factors: the water demand volume, geophysical parameters, and water management
objectives (Figure 1). The focus in this thesis was on the impacts of increasing
demand for water in agriculture, which is the main water demand sector, and water
resources depletion and drought occurrence frequencies in arid and semi-arid
regions. Two regions in central Iran, with similar climate and geophysical prospects,
were selected for analysis of the long-term impact of water overexploitation.
Fig. 1. Conceptual diagram of the water resources management framework.
Fars and Esfahan provinces, in central Iran, are important agricultural zones in the
country. The introduction of large-scale irrigation schemes in the second half of the
20th century increased the agricultural area and crop yield in both provinces (Paper
II; Paper III). However, the associated increase in exploitation of water in the two
provinces has increased the stress on their surface and groundwater resources.
Increased stress on the river water resources in the provinces has directly affected
the lake and wetland area in downstream river reaches (Paper I; Paper II). This has
resulted in shrinkage of surface areas of e.g., Lake Bakhtegan in Fars province and
the important Gavkhuni wetland in Esfahan province, affecting the ecological
biodiversity (Paper I). The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the role of irrigation-
based agriculture expansion for the frequency of occurrence of drought in the study
regions.

22
The first section of the thesis describes water mass depletion and the increase
in drought frequencies in Fars and Esfahan provinces and assesses whether this is
because of climate or human factors. Standardized precipitation index (SPI) was
used to determine the frequency of occurrence of meteorological drought, and
standardized drought index (SDI) to determine the frequency of occurrence of
hydrological drought. In normal conditions, meteorological and hydrological
drought occurrence is related to precipitation volume, and any increase in
hydrological droughts not related to dry years is directly related to overexploitation
of water resources. The increases in irrigated farmed area and in hydrological
drought occurrence were compared to assess whether water stress in the two
provinces is directly related to the farming activities. For this purpose, two new
agricultural drought indices were developed to connect water resources depletion
with irrigation expansion.
The second section of the thesis describes the use of remote sensing data to
monitor different hydrological parameters. Normalized differential water index
(NDWI), derived from satellite images, and was used to monitor surface area
changes in Lake Bakhtegan and Gavkhuni wetland. Satellite data from GRACE
were used to monitor groundwater reserves and the total water storage in Bakhtegan
basin and Zayanderud basin. In addition, remote sensing GLADS data were used
to derive evapotranspiration and soil moisture data for use in the water balance
equation.
The main hypothesis explored in this thesis was that agriculture expansion in
arid regions such as south and central Iran causes surface and groundwater
depletion. The following four research questions were addressed: Is
overexploitation of water resources the main trigger for groundwater depletion or
has climate change also contributed to this depletion? Is increased frequency of
occurrence of droughts related to human activities and irrigation? What are the
impacts of river flow depletion in terms of changes in flow and wetlands? Does
remote sensing data have sufficient reliability and coverage for use in monitoring
different hydrological cycle components, when compared with in-situ measured
data?

23
2 Study area and data used
2.1 Water resources in Iran
Water resources management in Iran developed rapidly since the mid of 20th century,
due to various economic and social factors. The Iranian population has increased
by eight-fold since 1900 (World Bank, 2020), with 75% of this population growth
occurring in rural areas (Torabi Farsani, Coelho, & Costa, 2012). The increase in
population increased the demand for potable and agricultural water. In the same
period, rapid urbanization and improvements in living standards increased the
demand for domestic water with improving living standards. This increase in water
demand, for domestic and agricultural needs, required major infrastructure and
system changes, which became more intense in the 1960s (Madani, 2014). Since
then, 88 major dams have been constructed and brought into operation, and 10 more
are under construction (Aquastat, 2015). These have increased Iran’s reservoir
capacity to 30 billion cubic meters (bcm), for the major purposes of irrigation,
domestic and industrial water supply, hydroelectricity, and flood control. In the
same period, the volume of groundwater extracted has increased via an increasing
number of deep and semi-deep wells, which replaced the traditional qanats
(Motagh et al., 2017). The increase in demand for water resources also required an
expansion in the water supply system and installation of transmission pipelines,
tunnels, and pumping stations (Motagh et al., 2017).
Mean annual precipitation in Iran as a whole is estimated to be 250 mm,
varying from 50 mm in the central arid areas to 1600 mm in the Northern Caspian
Sea coastal zone (Fahmi, 2012). Mean rainfall volume is estimated to be 400 bcm,
with a 68% evaporation rate removing 270 bcm (Valipour & Eslamian, 2014).
Mean volume of annual renewable water resources is estimated to be 130 bcm, with
92 bcm of this being lost as surface runoff and 38 bcm going to groundwater
recharge. The mean water volume usage per capita in 2017was 1688 m3, which is
much lower than the world average of 3980 m3. Iran is divided into six main
catchment areas: Central Plateau, Lake Urmia, Persian Gulf, Lake Hamoon, Kara-
Kum, and Caspian Sea (Nourani & Mano, 2007). Half of all renewable water
resources in the country are located in the Persian Gulf catchment in southern-
western Iran, which occupies a total area of 430,000 km2 (Madani, 2014). Potable
water quality in Iran is considered good, with 96% of the population having access
to safe water supply (Mohebbi et al., 2013). Water pollution in Iran is often due to

24
dumping of solid wastes, inputs of urban and industrial wastewater, and residues
from agricultural chemicals (Mohebbi et al., 2013).
The agriculture sector is considered the main water withdrawal sector in Iran,
using 92.2 percent of the total water consumption, of which 62 percent is from
groundwater and 38 percent is from surface water (Saatsaz, 2019). In terms of
actual volume, it is estimated that the annual exploitation volume for agriculture is
93 bcm, of which 53 bcm are from groundwater and 40 bcm are from surface water
(Madani, 2014). Most overexploitation of water resources occurs in the Central
Plateau catchment, where less surface water is available. This overexploitation has
led to an average 3.8 bcm annual depletion in groundwater resources (Keshavarz,
Karami, & Vanclay, 2013). The number of wells increased from 9000 in the 1970s
to 45,000 by 2010 (Keshavarz, Karami, & Lahsaeizadeh, 2013). The irrigated area
in Iran is estimated to be 8.7 million hectares, mostly surface irrigated (Aquastat,
2015). In terms of sources of water for the irrigated area, 5.2 million hectares are
irrigated using groundwater and 3.1 million hectares using surface water (Frenken,
2013). Wheat is the most widely irrigated crop in Iran, representing 31% of the total
irrigated area, followed by fodder crops, groundnuts, rice, and barley (Bannayan,
Sanjani, Alizadeh, Lotfabadi, & Mohamadian, 2010). Crop yields on irrigated land
are two- to three-fold higher than in rainfed areas, but the irrigation efficiency is
generally low, an estimated 33% as a national average (Bannayan, Lotfabadi,
Sanjani, Mohamadian, & Aghaalikhani, 2011).
2.2 Fars province
Fars province, the fourth largest province (122,608 km2), is located in central Iran.
Fars has a population of 4.85 million people, distributed between 68 percent urban
and 32 percent rural residents (Pishkar, 2015). Due to its geographical location
between the Zagros Mountains in the north-west, the Sirjan Desert in the north-east,
and the Persian Gulf in the south, Fars province contains different climate zones.
The variation in climate allows a variety of crops to be grown, including cereals,
beans, cotton, and maize. Orchard crops like almonds, apples, plums, citrus, and
palm date are also produced in the province (Pishkar, 2015). Fars is a leading
agricultural area in Iran and the agriculture sector in the province is important
economically, contributing 8.7% of total Iranian agricultural production (Pishkar,
2015). The agricultural sector provides 20.6% of jobs in the province (Pishkar,
2015). Fars had the highest cultivated area in Iran in the years 2005 and 2006, 1.08
and 1.06 million hectares, respectively (Ahmadi et al., 2015). Even with recent

25
droughts, Fars is still considered the leading province in agricultural production in
Iran (Paper III).
Although the climate in Fars province varies under the influence of
geographical factors, the temperate hyper-arid type is the dominant climate,
creating pressure on water resources with its high water dependency rate. Surface
water availability has been experiencing a continual reduction in recent years,
leading to major lakes drying up, because of agricultural expansion, river regulation,
and an increase in the frequency of meteorological droughts (Haghighi &
Keshtkaran, 2008). With surface water depletion, local people began to overexploit
the groundwater resources, leading to depletion in groundwater levels in the
province (Paper III).
For better drought analysis and assessment, in this thesis Fars province was
divided into six regions: southern, western, eastern, central, northwestern, and
northeastern (Figure 2). Monthly precipitation and temperature data for the period
1977–2016, obtained from 38 meteorological stations in Fars Province, were used
to assess the variations in meteorological drought occurrence. Stream flow data
obtained from 24 gauging stations on 17 rivers in the six main basins in Fars
province were used to assess hydrological drought intensity. The six main river
basins in Fars province are: Bakhtegan, Sirjan desert, Mond, Heleh, Kol-o-Mehran,
and Zohreh. Of these, Bakhtegan is the main basin in the province and the only
basin not shared with other provinces. The Kor River is the main river in Bakhtegan
basin and it discharges into Lake Bakhtegan downstream. The other five basins
discharge into the Persian Gulf and Sirjan Desert catchment areas.
The effect of repeated occurrence of meteorological and hydrological droughts,
in the period 1977–2016, on the occurrence of the agricultural droughts was
assessed in this thesis. Groundwater depletion in the period 1995–2015 in 12 major
aquifers in Fars province and fluctuations in the area of Lake Bakhtegan in the
period 1985–2015 were also assessed. Data on hydro-climatological factors, river
flow, groundwater levels, precipitation, and temperature data were provided by Fars
Regional Water Authority (FRRW, 2016). Data on farmed areas and the farming
methods used in the period 1977–2016 were provided by the Ministry of
Agricuclture, Jahad (MAJ).

26
Fig. 2. Maps showing (a) the location of Fars province in south-western Iran, (b) the six
main geographical regions in the province and the location of the meteorological
monitoring stations, (c) the six basins, major rivers, and 24 hydrological stations in Fars
province, and (d) province topography and the location of the 12 groundwater
monitoring wells (Reprinted [adapted] under CC BY license from Paper III © 2020
Authors).

27
2.3 Bakhtegan basin
Bakhtegan basin is located in the north-eastern part of Fars province (Figure 3).
The basin area is 31,511 km2, divided into 16,630 km2 of mountainous area and
14,881 km2 of plains (Hedayat, Zarei, Radmanesh, Mohammadi, 2017). The main
river in the province is the Kor, which rises in the Zagros Mountains and is 280 km
long (Haghighi & Klove, 2017). Lake Tashk and Lake Bakhtegan are the main lakes
in the province, with a total area of between 220 and 640 km2 depending on the
precipitation rate. Mean precipitation in the basin in the 43-year period between
1967 and 2009 was 270 mm (Choubin, Malekian, & Golshan, 2016). Thus most
areas in the basin belong to the hyper-arid climate type (Hojjati & Bostani, 2010).
Based on alluvial aquifer geometry and distribution, Bakhtegan basin is divided
into 27 groundwater zones (Figure 3). The total area of these aquifers is 10,564 km2
and the average thickness is between 30 and 50 m (Rasoulzadeh & Moosavi, 2007).
The aquifer sediments consist of rubble, stone, gravel, sand, silt, and clay, and most
of the aquifers are located in valleys between highlands. Groundwater is an
important water source in the basin, especially in the dry season when surface water
sources are depleted. The groundwater in Fars province is generally of good quality,
and low pumping costs and good availability make it the main water source used
for agricultural expansion in recent decades (Noshadi & Ghafourian, 2016).
However, overexploitation has led to depletion in groundwater levels in the
province, directly affecting surface water recharge (Hedayat et al., 2017). It is
estimated that 4000 million cubic meters (Mm3) are extracted every year from the
40,000 wells and boreholes in the province (Hokkati & Boustani, 2010).
Precipitation data from Bakhtegan basin were obtained from 22 local observation
stations for the period between 2002 and 2011 from Bureau for Design and
Development and Farmers Participation (BDDFP, 2011). Land use data and data on
average evapotranspiration were derived from USGS MODIS data and images
(Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center [ORNL
DAAC], 2011). GRACE water mass data for the basin for the period 2002–2015
were provided by the German Research Center for Geosciences. Soil moisture data
were computed from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) datasets
available from EARTHDATA (Rodell et al., 2004).

28
Fig. 3. Main image: Map of Bakhtegan basin showing alluvial aquifers, observation wells,
and the location of Lake Bakhtegan at the mouth of the river Kor. Inserts: (A) location
of Fars province in south-west Iran and (B) location of Bakhtegan basin in Fars province
(Reprinted [adapted] under CC BY license from Paper I © 2019 Authors).
2.4 Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province
The Zayanderud river basin is considered the largest and most important
agricultural, industrial, and urban zone in central Iran (Madani & Marino, 2009).
The river rises in the Zagros Mountains and flows east for 400 km to discharge in
Gavkhuni wetland (Figure 4). Gavkhuni wetland is listed under the Ramsar
Convention of 1975 and is considered one of the most important aquatic
ecosystems in Iran (Gohari et al., 2013). The basin ranges in altitude from 1470 to
3974 m above sea level and has a total area of 41,524 km2. Mean annual
precipitation in the basin ranges between 50 and 1500 mm (Akbari et al., 2007).
The temperature ranges between 3 and 30 °C and annual potential
evapotranspiration is around 1500 mm (Madani & Marino, 2009). There are 4.5
million inhabitants in the basin and, because of the fertile basin soils, agriculture is
the largest economic (and water-consuming) sector (Zamani, Grundmann, Libra, &

29
Nikouei, 2019). Precipitation is low in eastern and central parts of the basin, so
irrigation is essential for cultivation, which consumes 90% of total water resources
(Bijani & Hayati, 2015). Until the 1950s, the water systems in the basin were
confined to small diversion structures that provided irrigation water. The water was
derived from springs, underground qanats and snowmelt, and was used in a small
number of fully irrigated systems (Harandi & De Vries, 2014). The Zayanderud
dam was constructed in 1972 and has a total capacity of 1500 Mm3 (Gohari et al.,
2013). Later, three transbasin diversions were constructed, in 1985, 2004, and 2007,
adding 152 Mm3 annually to cities in the Dasht-e Kavir desert facing water stress
(Madani & Marino, 2009).
Precipitation, evapotranspiration, and temperature data for the basin in the
period 1963–2012 were provided by the Iranian Meteorological Organization
(IRIMO). Groundwater level data from 35 observation wells for the period 1981–
2015 were provided by the Iranian Water Resources Management Company
(WRM). Data on monthly inflow volume from the Zayanderud river to Gavkhuni
wetland for the period 1963–2012 were obtained from Varzaneh gauging station.
Data on the total variation in water mass storage was derived from GRACE datasets
for the period 2002–2015 provided by the German Research Center for
Geosciences. The GRACE data were limited to the period 2002–2015 because of
monthly image availability. Monthly satellite images of Gavkhuni wetland for the
period (1985–2015) were downloaded from the Landsat 4/5/7/8 Surface
Reflectance database of the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Variations
in 50-year precipitation and stream flow data (1963–2012) were used in monitoring
meteorological and hydrological droughts on a longer temporal scale. This long
monitoring period covered any change in the frequency of drought occurrence
before and after the 1980s, when the irrigated area in Zayanderud basin expanded
greatly.

30
Fig. 4. Main image: Map of Zayanderud basin showing observation wells, the location
of Gavkhuni wetland at the end of the Zayanderud River, and the Varzaneh hydrometric
station. Insert: Location of Zayanderud basin in central Iran (Reprinted [adapted] under
CC BY license from Paper II © 2020 Authors).

31
3 Methods
3.1 Climate variability analysis using the Emberger method
Many factors affect the climate variability such as precipitation, temperature,
evapotranspiration etc. In this thesis, the Emberger method (Emberger, 1932) was
used for the analysis of the climate variation in the study areas. It combines
Emberger climate classification, Emberger aridity index, standardized precipitation
index (SPI), streamflow drought index (SDI), surface and groundwater volume and
fluctuations in level, and agricultural development (Emberger, 1932). It was used
here to identify agricultural development and direct impacts of climate change on
water resources in Fars province as a whole, in Bakhtegan basin in Fars province,
and in Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province. The non-parametric Mann-Kendall
test was used for assessing trends in different drought types. The Emberger method
is widely used for climate classification in climatology, hydrology, ecology, and
bioclimatic analysis. The aridity index (Q) considers two important climate
parameters, precipitation and the temperature:
𝑄
, (1)
where P is annual precipitation in mm, M is mean maximum temperature of the
warmest month in degrees Kelvin (K), and m is mean minimum temperature of the
coldest month in K. The equation considers the minimum temperature of the coldest
month in the year, since vegetation growth is strictly related to thermal limits
(Emberger, 1932). The rate of evaporation changes with temperature variations, so
the term (M – m) represents evaporation and the continentality of a climate. Based
on Q and m values variation, 30 different climate classes are defined and
represented in an Emberger climatogram (Emberger, 1932) as shown in (Figure 5).

32
Fig. 5. Emberger climatogram based on aridity index (Q) and mean temperature (m) in
the coldest month of the year (Reprinted [adapted] under CC BY license from Paper III
© 2020 Authors).
Emberger aridity index (Q) was calculated for each station in the study areas based
on annual data. The three Emberger influence factors (humidity influence factor
(HIF), thermal influence factor (TIF), and climate influence factor (CIF)) and the
dominant humidity, thermal, and climate groups were then defined for each basin
in Fars province and for Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province. The calculations
were performed on decade scale (1977–1986, 1987–1996, 1997–2006, 2007–2016)
and for the whole study period (1976–2016). The three Emberger influence factors
are discussed in detail below.
There are six HIF groups, which show the influence of different humidity groups
over an area or station. These six HIF types are shown on the y-axis of the Emberger
climatogram (Figure 5). They comprise: HA (hyper-arid), AR (arid), SA (semi-arid),

33
SU (sub-humid), HU (humid), and HH (hyper-humid), which are defined based on the
value of Q in Equation 1. Humidity influence factor is defined by equation
HIF∑ NY
∑ ∑ NY, (2)
where HIFx is humidity influence factor for group x (HA, AR, SA, SH, HU, or SU) in
a region or station, n is number of meteorological stations in each region, NYxi is
number of years in which station i has experienced humidity conditions of type x, and
NYHi is number of years in which station i has experienced humidity conditions of type
H.
There are 5 TIF groups, which show the influence of different thermal groups over
an area or station. These five TIF types are shown on the x-axis of the Emberger
climatogram (Figure 5). They comprise: VC (very cold), CD (cold), CL (cool), TE
(temperate), and HO (hot), which are defined based on the value of mean lowest
temperature in the coldest month (m). Thermal influence factor is defined by equation
TIF∑ NY
∑ ∑ NY, (3)
where TIFy is thermal influence factor for group y (VC, CD, CL, TE, or HO) in a region
or station, n is number of meteorological stations in each region, NYyi is number of
years in which station i has experienced thermal conditions of type y, and NYTi is
number of years in which station i has experienced thermal conditions of type T.
There are 30 CIF groups, which show the influence of each climate group over an
area or station. Each climate group has two terms, where the first term indicates
humidity group (HA, AR, SA, SH, HU, SU) and the second term indicates thermal
group (VC, CD, CL, TE, HO). Climate influence factor is defined by equation
CIF∑ NY
∑ ∑ ∑ NY, (4)
where CIFx-y is climate influence factor of x and y, x is a humidity group and y is a
thermal group, in a region or station, H is humidity group (HA, AR, SA, SH, HU, or
SU), T is thermal group (VC, CD, CL, TE, or HO), n is number of meteorological
stations in each region, NY(x-y)i is number of years in which station i has experienced
climate type x and y in the selected region, and NYHTi is number of years in which
station i has experienced humidity conditions of type H and thermal conditions of type
T. Details of the 30 CIFs are provided in Table 1.

34
Table 1. The 30 types of climate influence factor (CIF) defined in the Emberger
classification (Emberger, 1932).
Humidity group Thermal group
very gold cold cool temperate hot
hyper-arid VC-HA CD-HA CL-HA TE-HA HO-HA
arid VC-AR CD-AR CL-AR TE-AR HO-AR
semi-arid VC-SA CD-SA CL-SA TE-SA HO-SA
sub-humid VC-SH CD-SH CL-SH TE-SH HO-SH
humid VC-HU CD-HU CL-HU TE-HU HO-HU
hyper-humid VC-HH CD-HH CL-HH TE-HH HO-HH
3.2 Analysis of metrological, hydrological, and agricultural
droughts
Standardized precipitation index (SPI) is used for defining and monitoring
meteorological droughts. Zero and positive SPI values reflect normal and wet
conditions, while negative values indicate meteorological drought (Table 2). A detailed
definition of states, as suggested by McKee et al. (1993), is provided in Table 2. The
gamma distribution of monthly precipitation time series is calculated as suggested by
Lloyd and Saunders (2002) using equations
SPI 𝑡 (5)
and
SPI 𝑡 , (6)
where c0 = 2.515517, c1 = 0.802853, c2 = 0.010328, d1 = 1.432788, d2 = 0.189269, and
d3 = 0.001308, and t is average precipitation on the scale parameter. Equation 5 is used
for 0 < Hx ≤ 0.5 and Equation 6 is used for 0.5 < Hx < 1, where Hx is the cumulative
probability function for the gamma distribution.In this thesis, SPI was calculated
using the SPI Generator application provided by the National Drought Mitigation
Center (UNL) in Canada and USA, for aggregation time of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
respectively. SPI is derived from the precipitation volume, without considering
important parameters like evapotranspiration and soil moisture, and thus a more
comprehensive index must be used for comparison.

35
Table 2. Standardized precipitation index (SPI) classification of states devised by McKee
et al. (1993).
Range of SPI Description of state
SPI ≥ 2.0 Extremely wet (EW)
1.5 ≤ SPI < 2.0 Severely wet (SW)
1.0 ≤ SPI < 1.5 Moderately wet (MW)
0 ≤ SPI < 1.0 Normally wet (Nw)
- 1.0 ≤ SPI < 0 Normally dry (ND)
- 1.5 ≤ SPI < - 1.0 Moderately dry (MD)
- 2.0 ≤ SPI < - 1.5 Severely dry (SD)
SPI < - 2.0 Extremely dry (ED)
Streamflow drought index (SDI) uses standardized annual streamflow volumes to
define values lower than the mean streamflow at least at standard deviation value,
meaning that it shows if the annual flow is lower or higher than the average for the
study period (Palmer, 1965). Based on SDI values, the state of hydrological
droughts is defined in a way close to that for SPI Table 3. Fieldhouse and Palmer
(1965) suggest that SDI can be calculated using the following equation:
SDI =
, (7)
where Fi is the annual stream flow for a given period 𝑖, and 𝐹 and 𝑆 are the mean
and standard deviation of the cumulative streamflow for the whole study period.
The SDI was calculated for an aggregation time of 1 month.
Table 3. Streamflow drought index classification of states (Palmer, 1965).
Criterion Description of state
SDI ≥ 0.0 No drought
- 1.0 ≤ SDI < 0.0 Mild drought
- 1.5 ≤ SDI < - 1.0 Moderate drought
- 2.0 ≤ SDI < - 1.5 Severe drought
SDI < - 2.0 Extreme drought
For monitoring agricultural drought, two indices were developed in this thesis,
overall agricultural drought index (OADI) and agricultural drought index (ADI), to
evaluate changes in agriculture and drought in the study area (Paper III). These
indices are defined by equations
OADI (8)

36
and
ADI , (9)
where
𝐴∑
. (10)
In Equations 8–10 Ay and Ai are annual farmed areas for a given year y and i,
respectively, A and S are mean and standard deviation of farmed area for the whole
study period, and A1–Y and S1–y are mean and standard deviation of farmed area between
the first year and year y in the study period. These indices were calculated for irrigated,
rainfed, and total farmed area. The OADI shows, in any year, whether the irrigated
or rainfed area of farmed land is below or above the overall average, while the ADI
shows whether it is below or above the average in a given period. OADI and ADI
annual values are directly related to the agricultural area farming type, either
irrigated or rainfed. This shows the direct annual impact of precipitation and water
availability on the irrigated area variability. If the study period is divided into
decade sub-periods, as in this thesis, ADI shows the change in farmed area in any
decade.
3.3 Using Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) to monitor the
fluctuation in surface area of Gavkhuni wetland and Lake
Bakhtegan
Landsat satellites have been operating since 1972, providing a continuous global
record of the Earth’s land surface. The imagery is currently available at no cost
through the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Monthly Landsat surface
reflectance images for Gavkhuni wetland and Lake Bakhtegan for the period from
January 1985 to December 2015 were downloaded from the Landsat database. For
this study period Landsat missions 5, 7 and 8 datasets are used. Landsat 5 images
consist of seven spectral bands with a spatial resolution of 30 meters for bands 1 to
5 and 7 (Chander et al., 2004). Spatial resolution for band 6 (thermal infrared) is
120 meters, but is resampled to 30 meter pixels (Chander et al., 2004). Landsat 7
images consist of eight spectral bands with a spatial resolution of 30 meters for
bands 1 to 7. The resolution for band 8, panchromatic, is 15 meters. Landsat 8
images consist of nine spectral bands with a spatial resolution of 30 meters for
bands 1 to 7 and 9 (Roy et al., 2014). New band 1, ultra-blue, is useful for coastal

37
and aerosol studies. New band 9 is useful for cirrus cloud detection (Roy et al.,
2014). The resolution for band 8, panchromatic is 15 meters (Roy et al., 2014).
Reflectance images show the reflectance capacity of different surfaces, including
water bodies. Most of the selected images were cloud-free or nearly cloud-free, and
were georeferenced with the topographical maps. In the electromagnetic spectrum,
water absorbs almost all of incident radiation in the near and mid-infrared bands,
while it shows a strong reflectance in visible bands. Based on the spectral analysis,
NDWI was used to extract the water body, employing a method by McFeeters
(1996). NDWI is a band ratio index between the green and near infrared (NIR)
spectral bands, which not only enhance water features, but also depress vegetation,
bare land, and other environmental information. NDWI is calculated by equation
NDWI =
, (11)
where (RGreen) is the top of atmospheric reflectance of the green band and (RNir)
represents that of the near-infrared band, which correspond to band 2 and band 4,
respectively, in Landsat surface reflectance. The NDWI value ranges from –1 to 1.
McFeeters (1996) also set zero as the threshold, where the cover type is water if
NDWI > 0 and non-water if NDWI ≤ 0. In order to indicate the best NDWI value
reflecting Gavkhuni wetland and Lake Bakhtegan, nine sub-thresholds were
defined, with values of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 respectively, for
the positive NDWI values. The higher the NDWI value, the higher the reflection
rate, indicating higher probability of a water body. For different sub-threshold
values, the corresponding wetland area was obtained by image processing using
MATLAB. Starting with in-situ data for Gavkhuni wetland, the monthly variation
in wetland volume was calculated for each sub-threshold from the water balance
equation
ΔV Vi – Vi-1 Ai Pi – Ei QiΔt , (12)
where area Ai is equivalent to (An + An-1)/2, where n is any given month, and Pi, Ei,
and QiΔt are monthly precipitation, evapotranspiration, and inflow volume,
respectively. Both Pi and Ei are in mm and QiΔt is in m3 per month. Using equation
12 with every sub-threshold, nine different values of ΔV are obtained for each value
of Ai. The monthly variation in wetland water level ΔH can be expressed as
ΔH = . (13)

38
Using Equation 13 with every sub-threshold, nine different values of ΔH are
calculated for each value of Ai. But ΔH is also equivalent to
ΔH = Pi - Ei (14)
Using the values of ΔH, Pi, Ei, and Ai calculated previously, the value of QiΔt in
equation 12 can be expressed in mm for the nine different values of Ai. The real-
time value of QiΔt measured at a gauging station is then compared with the nine
different QiΔt values calculated. This can be done using the “coefficient of
determination” method by equation
R2 = ∑ ∑ ∑
∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ , (15)
where n is the number of observations, QiΔtobs is the real time monthly flow volume
and QiΔtmod is the flow volume calculated from Equation 12.
The coefficient of determination (R2) ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 meaning that
the calculated flow and the real flow volumes are independent, and 1 meaning both
values are related without errors. The area of the sub-threshold with the highest
value best fits the flow data available. This sub-threshold area is thus considered
the most similar area to the real-time wetland surface area. From the data produced,
an area Ai versus volume ΔV relationship can be obtained. This mathematical
relationship can be used to fill in missing wetland area data. In the present case,
data availability was restricted by climate factors, such as clouds and fogs, and
blurring of the images downloaded. Thus the sub-threshold with the highest
coefficient of determination was used to derive monthly area data for Lake
Bakhtegan. The water balance equation (Equation 12) can also be used to fill in
values missing due to unavailability or blurring of satellite images.
3.4 Monitoring total water mass depletion in Zayanderud and
Bakhtegan basins, and groundwater depletion in Bakhtegan
basin, using GRACE data
For more than 15 years of operations, from 2002 till 2017, the GRACE satellite
mission revolutionized our view of how water moves and is stored on Earth.
GRACE measured changes in the local pull of gravity as water shifts around Earth
due to changing seasons, weather and climate processes. In this study, GRACE data
for the period 2002 till 2015 were examined to determine the total water mass
variation in Bakhtegan basin and Zayanderud basin. GRACE data represent gravity

39
anomalies, showing the mass distribution variation on the planet. The data consist
of monthly images, which when analyzed reveal monthly anomalies in total water
storage. The GRACE data show mass change, or equivalent water height, which is
expressed as monthly variation WMI in mm. The GRACE data were provided by the
German Research Center for Geosciences (GFZ). In order to identify water storage
changes from the spherical harmonic coefficients provided by GFZ, the following
procedure was followed. First, we replaced C20 according to instructions outlined
in GRACE technical note 7 (Cheng, Tapley & Ries, 2013). We then added degree
1 according to the estimation by Swenson et al. (2008) to correct for geocentric
motion. The degree 1 Love number (K1 = 0.021) was taken into account. We then
carefully removed the primary tidal aliasing error of the tidal constituents S2, S1,
and P1, and the secondary tidal aliasing error of M2, O2, O1, and Q1 from the
spherical harmonics (Tourian, 2013). Next, we removed the Glacial Isostatic
Adjustment (GIA) according to the model provided by Wahr and Zhong (2013) and
filtered the coefficients by a Gaussian filter (450 km radius) and a destriping filter,
as proposed by Swenson and Wahr (2006). Finally, in order to account for leakage,
we applied the so-called data-driven method developed by Vishwakarma et al.
(2017). This method is able to restore the signal lost due to filtering, irrespective of
the catchment size.
The groundwater component can be isolated from the total GRACE data.
According to Rodell and Famiglietti (2002), this can be achieved by subtracting the
monthly fluctuation in snow, surface water, and soil moisture volume from the total
water mass by equation
GWMI = WMI – SW – SM, (16)
where GWMI is the groundwater storage thickness derived from the GRACE data,
WMI is the total water mass, SW is the surface water storage, and SM is soil moisture.
The change in surface water storage was calculated from flow data available for
Lake Bakhtegan and Lake Tashk, which are the only surface water bodies in the
study basins. The stream gauges are located in the lake inlets, where the flow data
are recorded. SW can be expressed in the following equation
SW = , (17)
where QiΔt is the monthly inflow volume, EiΔt is the monthly evapotranspiration
volume and AT is the total area of lakes Bakhtegan and Tashk in any given month.
Soil moisture values were computed from the GLDAS datasets available from
EARTHDATA (Rodell & Kato, 2007). The GLDAS can provide various continuous,

40
high-resolution estimates of land surface states and fluxes, such as soil moisture,
soil temperature, latent heat flux, and sensible heat flux. The GLDAS data represent
the water content in different soil layers, 0 to 10 cm, 10 to 40 cm, 40 to 100 cm,
100 to 200 cm. In this study, the 3 hourly 0.25o and 1.0o GLDAS Version 1 products
are used.
In order to compare the GRACE-derived data with the in-situ data, monthly
groundwater levels in 448 observation wells spread throughout Bakhtegan basin
were used. These wells depth vary from 30 to 50 meters depending on the aquifer
depth. The groundwater table levels are monitored on weekly bases. As GRACE
data show the monthly variation of groundwater levels in catchment scale, the
specific monthly groundwater volume variation ΔS in the total catchment area was
calculated by equation
ΔS = ∑ .
(18)
where Si is the groundwater level variation in a given aquifer i, Ai is the area of
aquifer i, and AT is the total catchment area. Here, ΔS is expressed in (mm). For any
given period, the accumulated groundwater volume in the basin ΔSi is equal to
ΔSi = ∑ ΔS. (19)
In this case, ΔSi shows the variation in groundwater storage volume. The
groundwater extracted in the catchment can be assumed to be used mostly by
agriculture, as more than 90 percent of the groundwater exploitation is for
agricultural purpose, and thus directly related to soil moisture. The remaining 10
percent is divided between domestic, 3 percent, and industrial 7 percent. Therefore
ΔSi can be compared with the groundwater volume fluctuation derived from
GRACE data.

41
4 Results
4.1 Spatiotemporal climate variability in Fars province and in
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province
4.1.1 Fars province
For the study period from 1977–2016, 21 different climate types were detected in
Fars province based on the Emberger index (see Figure 5). It was observed that the
variety of climate types present decreased over time. It was at its peak in the period
from 1987–1996, with 20 different climate types, which decreased to 14 types in
the period from 2007–2016. The greatest climate variety was recorded in the central
region of the province, with 17 types, while the least variation was observed in
western and northeastern region, with eight types each. Hyper-arid and temperate
climate types were the most frequently occurring in the province, being detected in
14.9% of years in the study period. From the first decade in the study period to the
last decade, the frequency of hyper-arid and temperate climate types increased from
12.7 to 20.8%. Humid and very cold, and humid and cold climate types were the
least frequently occurring, in 0.4 and 0.9% of years respectively, and occurring only
in the northwest of the province. In general, except for the northeastern part, the
climate type diversity in Fars province decreased during the study period (1977–
2016).
Based on CIF, regionally the most frequent climate types were hyper-arid and
temperate in western and southern parts of Fars province (42.2 and 40.5% of years);
arid and very cold in northeastern parts (33.6%); semi-arid and very cold in
northwestern parts (26.2%); and semi-arid and cold in central parts (16%). It was
observed that, except for the southern region, the dominant climate type changed
during the study period.
Based on HIF, hyper-arid was the dominant humidity group, occurring in 32.3%
of years in the study period. The occurrence of the hyper-aridity type increased
from 30.6 to 44.4% during the 40-year period. Arid (31.4%), semi-arid (24.9%),
and sub-humid (11.1%) were the next most common humidity types during the
study period, with a noticeable decrease in frequency of occurrence.
Based on TIF, the very cold thermal group was the dominant group, with 28.7%
occurrence, followed temperate (26.5%), cool (21.3%), cold (19%), and hot (4.5%).

42
During the study period, it was noticed that the frequency of occurrence of the cold
thermal groups increased.
4.1.2 Zayanderud basin
Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province had less diverse climate types than Fars
province. Three climate types were detected, hyper-arid cold, hyper-arid very cold,
and arid cold, with CIF values of 57.5, 30, and 12.5%, respectively. Unlike in Fars
province, the climate type distribution in Zayanderud basin did not change much
during the 40-year study period, and the climate distribution remained constant.
Based on HIF, hyper-arid was the dominant humidity group, with 87.5%
occurrence, followed by arid (12.5%). The TIF calculations also showed two
thermal groups, cold (70%) and very cold (30%). The HIF and TIF distributions
did not indicate any major change during the study period. Detailed decadal CIF,
HIF, and TIF distributions for the period from 1977–2016 can be found in Figure
6.

43
Fig. 6. Results of Emberger climate classifications for the six different regions in Fars
Province (Central, North-eastern, Eastern, North-western, Western, and Central), and
for Zayanderud basin (Esfahan). Y-axis shows percentage occurrence of different
climate types (Papers II and III) during the study period from 1977 till 2016. The detailed
climate classification are found in (Table 1) (Under CC BY license from Paper III © 2020
Authors).

44
4.2 Monitoring meteorological drought in Fars province
In Fars province, the SPI calculation for the last decade of the study period from
1977–2016 showed the most extreme droughts in different regions, with 2008 being
the driest year (Figure 7). The years 2006 and 2007 had the longest drought periods
in eastern and southern regions, and in the whole province. It is noticeable that even
with latter decades of the study period having a majority of negative SPI values,
there was no recorded decrease or negative trend in the precipitation values. The
year 1990 was the start of the wettest decade in all of Fars province except the
eastern region, where it began in 1996. The year 1993 was considered extremely
wet and had the highest SPI value, while on a regional basis the wettest years were:
2005 in central, 2004 in northwestern, 1997 in western, 1999 in eastern, 2004 in
northeastern, and 1993 in southern. The year 1990 was a threshold in the SPI
calculations, with the SPI values randomly occurring before that. After 1990 there
was a wet period from 1990 to 2006, and then a dry period from 2006 to 2016.
“Normally wet” and “normally dry” conditions according to the SPI values were
the most commonly occurring conditions in 18% of the years. When “moderately
wet” conditions were included, the total occurrence increased to 25% of the years
(Figure 8). This shows that meteorological drought years were less frequent than
normal and wet years, and were more common in southern and eastern regions than
the other regions of Fars province. This results have been confirmed with similar
studies in the province (Moradi, Rajabi & Faragzadeh, 2011).

45
Fig
. 7. (
a)
Pre
cip
itati
on
vo
lum
e d
istr
ibu
tio
n i
n m
m (
Pap
er
III)
an
d (
b)
reg
ion
al
sta
nd
ard
ized
pre
cip
itati
on
in
de
x (
SP
I) i
n t
he
six
reg
ion
s o
f F
ars
pro
vin
ce i
n t
he
pe
rio
d 1
97
7–
201
6.
ED
: e
xtr
em
ely
dry
, S
D:
se
ve
rely
dry
, M
oD
: m
od
era
tely
dry
, M
iD:
mil
dly
dry
, N
o:
no
rmal,
MiW
: m
ild
ly w
et,
Mo
W:
mo
dera
tely
wet,
SW
: se
ve
rely
we
t, a
nd
EW
: e
xtr
em
ely
wet
(Un
der
CC
BY
lic
en
se f
rom
Pap
er
III
©
20
20 A
uth
ors
).

46
Fig. 8. Percentage occurrence of standardized precipitation index (SPI) values and
distribution in the six regions of Fars province and in the province as a whole. ED:
extremely drought, SD: severely drought, MoD: moderately drought, MiD: mildly
drought, No: normal, MiW: mildly wet, MoW: moderately wet, SW: severely wet, and EW:
extremely wet (Under CC BY license from Paper III © 2020 Authors).

47
4.3 Monitoring hydrological drought in Fars province
For the study period from 1977–2016, all 24 gauging stations on the main rivers
(Kor, Firouzabad, and Mond) in Fars province showed a significant negative trend,
with the year 1997 being the point of change to a significant negative trend. In the
period from 1977–1996, 17 out of the 24 stations (70%) showed a positive trend,
while the remaining 30% showed a non-significant negative trend (Figure 9). In the
second half of the study period (1997–2016), all stations showed a significant
negative trend. The stations were distributed along the river, from upstream to
downstream. In the second half of the study period, flow at many stations reached
zero or near zero (stations 4, 5, 6, 7, and 18). In this period, the mean reduction in
flow volume at the stations varied from 42% to 70% (station 24). These results
show that flow at the stations changed from being non-stationary, basically
depending on precipitation volume, to stationary negative flow over the 40 years
studied. Analysis of these results confirmed an extended hydrological drought after
1997, with a continuous negative trend. The stations that experienced mild droughts
from 1977 to 1996, such as stations 7, 14, and 24, in eastern and western areas,
witnessed an increase in drought frequencies reaching 73% in the period from
1997–2016 (Figure 10). Hydrological drought was most common in the eastern
zone, increasing from 50 to 77.5 % occurrence during the study period.

48
Fig. 9. Flow at 24 gauging stations on the Kor, Firouzabad, and Mond rivers in Fars
province in the period 1977–2016. The red lines indicate whether a station had a
negative or positive trend (Reprinted [adapted] under CC BY license from Paper III ©
2020 Authors).

49
Fig. 10. Variation in streamflow drought index (SDI) at 24 gauging stations on the Kor,
Firouzabad, and Mond rivers in Fars province in the period 1977–2016. C: central, NE:
north-eastern, E: eastern, NW: north-western, W: western, and C: central, NE: north-
eastern, E: eastern, NW: north-western, and W: western (Under CC BY license from
Paper III © 2020 Authors).

50
4.4 Monitoring meteorological and hydrological drought in
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province
The SPI and SDI calculations showed that the occurrence of meteorological
droughts was less frequent than the occurrence of hydrological droughts in
Zayanderud basin (Figure 11). In the period from 1963–2012, 54% of years had
SPI values higher than 0, meaning that they can be considered wet years. Adding
“normal dry” years with SPI value between –1 and 0, 90% of the years can be
considered non-drought years. The remaining 10% of years in the study period can
be considered “moderately dry” years, and they were spread randomly throughout
the study period. There was no record in the basin of “severely or extremely” dry
years, even though Zayanderud basin is considered an arid zone. In contrast, based
on the SDI calculation, hydrological droughts (SDI values less than 0) were
recorded in 60% of the years (Figure 11). It was found that the intensity and
frequency of hydrological droughts increased after 1980. Between 1980 and 2012,
the frequency of occurrence of hydrological droughts increased to 75%, compared
with 35% in the period from 1963–1979. In the same period, the irrigated area in
the basin increased from 25,000 to 40,000 hectares. The hydrological droughts
before 1980 were directly affected by the precipitation volume (Figure 11), as their
occurrence was restricted to years with lower SPI value. There was a clear change
to constant positive values of SPI minus SDI in the basin in the 1990s and 2000s
(Figure 11). There were some positive SPI - SDI values, indicating hydrological
drought in years considered as being either wet or normally dry years based on the
SPI values. The best evidence for this was found in 1998 and 1999, as these were
considered to be years with the most severe hydrological drought, but were
“normally wet” based on SPI calculations.

51
Fig. 11. Change in monthly A) standardized precipitation index (SPI) and B) streamflow
drought index (SDI) values for Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province, and C) annual SPI,
SDI, and SPI - SDI values in the period 1963–2012 (Under CC BY license from Paper II ©
2020 Authors).
4.5 Monitoring the transformation from rainfed to irrigated farming
in Fars province
In the study period from 1977–2016, there was an increase and a positive trend in
irrigated area in Fars province, a decrease and negative trend in rainfed area, and
no significant trend in total farmed area (Figure 12). Based on the farmed area data,
provided from (MAJ) the study period was divided into two main periods: a period
of constant increase in farmed area until 2006, reaching a peak of 1,193,450
hectares, with an average increase of 11,650 hectares annually, and a period of
constant decrease in farmed area, to almost half the peak (631,000 hectares) by
2016 and an average decrease of 20,310 hectares annually. It is noticeable that the
expansion in farmed area between 1977 and 2006 was only in the irrigated area,

52
with a rate of increase of 14,079 hectares annually. The rainfed area decreased
significantly in the same period, at a rate of 2430 hectares annually. In the period
from 2007–2016, both irrigated and rainfed area showed a significant decrease, of
20,300 and 7260 hectares annually, respectively.
Overall agricultural drought index (OADI) values showed that in the period
from 1977–1996, the mean rainfed area exceeded the irrigated area (Figure 12).
The main change happened after 1997, when rainfed areas (with low water
requirements) were replaced by irrigated areas with higher water demand. The
irrigated area reached its peak (870,000 hectares) in 2006 and then kept on
decreasing gradually, reaching 397,000 hectares in 2016. The rainfed area reached
its peak (396,000 hectares) in 1983. The year 1983 was considered a “normal wet
year” according to the SPI calculation. The year with the lowest rainfed farmed
area (60,000 hectares) was 2000, a severe meteorological year according to the SPI
calculations. It is important also to mention that the rainfed contribution to
agriculture, on a yield basis, decreased from 41% in the first decade of the study
period to 20% in the last decade.
Agricultural drought index (ADI) values showed agricultural drought in Fars
province after the year 2006. The total farmed area before 2006 showed positive
ADI values, meaning no agricultural drought, excluding the years when the
province was affected by meteorological drought. With a deficit in rainfall volume,
which is considered a major limiting factor in rainfed agriculture, farmers
increasingly began to irrigate their farmed area. This increase in irrigated area led
to an increase in the ADI values over the years. The ADI values in irrigated areas
were found to be positive before the year 2006. This demonstrates that hydrological
and meteorological droughts did not drive the expansion in irrigated area, but rather
than farmers compensated for surface water depletion with groundwater
overexploitation.

53
Fig. 12. Change in agricultural land use in Fars province 1977–2016. (a1), (a2), and (a3)
show irrigated, rainfed, and total farmed area, respectively, while (b1) to (b3) show
overall agricultural drought index (OADI) values and (c1) to (c3) show agricultural
drought index (ADI) values. Solid lines show trend over the total study period and
dashed lines show sub-trend lines before and after the turning point (Under CC BY
license from Paper III © 2020 Authors).

54
4.6 Monitoring groundwater depletion in Fars province and
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province
4.6.1 Fars province
Considering the hydrological drought analysis (SDI) and its negative trend,
meaning lack of surface water availability, it can be concluded that in Fars province
the expansion in irrigated area in the study period was based on groundwater
exploitation. This unsustainable exploitation of groundwater resources led to
groundwater depletion in the 12 major aquifers in the province (Figure 13). During
the period from 1995–2015 and based on available data, the greatest depletion in
groundwater level (50 m decline) was recorded in the Arsenjan aquifer in the
eastern region. Even the least depleted aquifers (Shiraz and Neyriz) recorded a 10
m depletion in a period of 20 years. The groundwater level depletion was directly
related to aquifer area, as smaller aquifers showed greater depletion. The Arsenjan
aquifer (area 101.6 km2) showed the greatest depletion volume (around 0.212 km3).
The lowest depletion volume (~0.123 km3) was in Shiraz aquifer (area 207 km2).
The ADI calculations in the previous section showed a decrease in farmed area after
the year 2006. Based on this finding, in combination with the results of
meteorological and hydrological drought analysis for the period after 2006 and the
groundwater level depletion, it can be concluded that Fars province faced a severe
agricultural drought from 2006.
4.6.2 Zayanderud basin
Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province showed a similar story, as the irrigated area
in the province doubled from 1981 to peak at 41,500 hectares in 2015. In this period,
the groundwater level was depleted in all major aquifers in Zayanderud basin
(Figure 14). On average, the annual groundwater depletion volume was estimated
to be 365 Mm3 and the average annual decline in the groundwater level was 0.6 m.
This decline was directly related to overexploitation of groundwater resources due
to expansion of the irrigated area. The most severe groundwater depletion was
recorded in North and South Mahyar, Damaneh, Isfahan, Murchehkhort, and
Ardestan, which are major agricultural zones in Zayanderud basin. Although in the
wet years 1986, 1993, and 2004 (according to SPI calculations) there was some
recharge in the groundwater level, the trend in the study period was negative. The
greatest depletion occurred in the 1990s and 2000s, in parallel with hydrological

55
drought in the same period. In years considered dry or moderately dry, it was
evident that the groundwater exploitation rate increased.
Fig. 13. Cumulative groundwater level fluctuation in the 12 major aquifers in Fars
province, 1995–2015 (Under CC BY license from Paper III © 2020 Authors).

56
Fig. 14. Cumulative groundwater level fluctuation in the 12 major aquifers in
Zayanderud basin, Esfahan province, 1981–2015 (Under CC BY license from Paper II ©
2020 Authors).

57
4.7 Monitoring surface area change in Gavkhuni wetland using
Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI)
Fluctuations in the surface area of Gavkhuni wetland area were directly related to
the inflow volume from the Zayanderud River, which is mainly based on
precipitation and snowmelt volume. With the increase in the surface water and
groundwater exploitation along the river, the flow rate into the wetland reached
alarmingly low levels. Based on coefficient of determination (Equation 15), an
NDWI threshold of 0.5 showed the highest determination (0.75). This means that
the NDWI threshold of 0.5 was congruent in 75% of cases with the real wetland
area (Figure 15). Using the wetland surface area data from the NDWI and the water
balance equation (Equation 12), the area versus volume equation was obtained and
missing data for the wetland were interpolated. Missing NDWI data, marked with
red in (Figure 15), were due to blurred unavailable satellite images. In the period
1985–2015, the wetland area showed great fluctuation, in many cases annually. The
largest wetland area recorded was 480 km2, in the years 1993 and 1994. This can
be related to 1993 being a wet year with high precipitation (145 mm). The year
2009 had higher precipitation (218 mm), but the wetland area only reached 320
km2. This difference reflects the increase in surface water exploitation between the
two years. The smallest wetland area, 30 km2, was recorded in 2008, which was a
dry year with only 24 mm precipitation. Low SPI values were thus not the only
reason for surface water depletion, but rather decreased inflow volume to the
wetland (Figure 15). Even through 90% of years were normal years based on the
SPI values, mean inflow volume decreased from 226 M m3 in the 1960s to 5 Mm3
in 2010. The greatest reduction in inflow was recorded after the 1980s, with a
depleting volume of 100 Mm3 per decade. The NDWI-derived values for the
fluctuation in wetland surface area were confirmed by the real-time data on full and
dry status of Gavkhuni wetland in different years (Figure 16).

58
Fig
. 15.
Inte
rpo
late
d (
A)
infl
ow
to
Gavkh
un
i w
etl
an
d (
Mm
3)
an
d (
B)
su
rfa
ce a
rea (
km
2)
of
the w
etl
an
d b
ased
on
measu
red
an
d
no
rmali
zed
dif
fere
nce w
ate
r in
de
x (
ND
WI)
-deri
ved
in
terp
ola
ted
valu
es (
ND
WI)
-deri
ved
in
terp
ola
ted
valu
es (
Un
der
CC
BY
lic
en
se
fro
m P
ap
er
II ©
202
0 A
uth
ors
).

59
Fig. 16. Surface area of Gavkhuni wetland, based on real-time data, in (A) 1988, (B) 1993,
(C) 2009, and (D) 2010. (Reprinted with permission from Google Earth © 2020 Maxar
Technologies).

60
4.8 Monitoring total water storage depletion in Zayanderud and
Bakhtegan basins using GRACE data
The GRACE data available (2002–2015) showed depletion in total water storage
volume in both Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province and Bakhtegan basin in Fars
province (Figure 17). In the 14-year period, and taking 2002 as a baseline,
Zayanderud basin showed average depletion of 32 mm monthly and 385 mm
annually from the baseline. Despite the depletion in the study area, there was
average recharge in total water storage of 200 mm annually from 2002 till 2007.
The depletion started to be severe after 2008, a drought year based on SPI values.
Exploitation of water resources was so high that all months after 2008 showed a
negative total storage anomaly value, i.e., depletion. In this period, the basin
experienced total drying up of Gavkhuni wetland and severe declines in
groundwater level. The Zayanderud streamflow was zero downstream and at its
lowest rates upstream, and evapotranspiration levels were at their peak.
Similar findings were obtained for Bakhtegan basin, taking 2002 as a baseline,
an average total water storage depletion reached 17.5 mm monthly and 211 mm
annually (Figure 17). Positive values indicated recharge in the basin in the period
from 2002–2007, by an annual average of 168 mm. The highest recharge rate, 371
mm, was witnessed in 2005, a wet year in the basin. The depletion resumed in
Bakhtegan basin in 2008, a severe drought year based on SPI values. The inflow to
Lake Bakhtegan in this period reached zero and the lake dried up, while streamflow
in upstream reaches of the river was minimal. In-situ data showed a decline in
groundwater level as groundwater resources were overexploited.

61
Fig
. 17.
Ch
an
ge in
to
tal w
ate
r sto
rag
e, d
eri
ve
d fro
m G
RA
CE
data
, in
(m
m):
(A
) Z
aya
nd
eru
d b
asin
an
d (B
) B
akh
teg
an
basin
(R
ep
rin
ted
[ad
ap
ted
] u
nd
er
CC
BY
lic
en
se f
rom
Pap
er
I ©
20
19 A
uth
ors
an
d P
ap
er
II ©
20
20 A
uth
ors
).

62
4.9 Monitoring groundwater depletion in Bakhtegan basin using
GRACE data
The relationship between available GRACE data on groundwater level and local
in-situ groundwater volume fluctuation was analyzed for the period 2002–2011.
The monthly GRACE groundwater data showed a direct response to the water
balance equation (Equation 12). The SPI values showed a decrease in precipitation
volume for the period, especially after the drought in 2007. Mean annual
precipitation decreased from 307 mm between 2002 and 2006 to 180 mm between
2007 and 2011 (Figure 18). The evapotranspiration rate was on average 480 mm
annually, meaning that groundwater resources were used to cover the water
shortage, and the water balance in Bakhtegan basin showed a negative trend.
Average soil moisture varied between –8 and 13 mm during the year, with the
highest values in February and March, and the lowest in June and July.
Fig. 18. Mean annual precipitation (mm) in Bakhtegan basin, 2002-2011, and distribution
of the 22 precipitation stations in the basin (Reprinted [adapted] under CC BY license
from Paper I © 2019 Authors).
The in-situ data showed that groundwater levels in the basin declined by an average
of 8 mm monthly, with the average increasing after 2007 to 13 mm monthly. The
highest exploitation rates were observed in the end of the summer season, in
September and October, and the lowest in April and May. The GRACE
groundwater anomaly data showed agreement with the net precipitation and the in-
situ collected data. Although differing in magnitude, the in-situ and GRACE data
showed similar trends (Figure 19). Having 2002 as a baseline, the GRACE data
showed average monthly depletion of 7 mm, which increased to 26 mm after 2007.

63
The in-situ data showed total depletion of 905 mm during the 10-year period 2002
till 2011, while the GRACE data showed a total depletion of 794 mm. This was
expected, as Bakhtegan basin is smaller than the minimum 200,000 km2
recommended area when using GRACE data to monitor groundwater depletion.
However, the results showed 0.6 congruence rate, meaning that GRACE data were
congruent with the in-situ data in 60% of cases.

64
Fig
. 19.
Net p
recip
itati
on
, in
-sit
u c
oll
ecte
d d
ata
, an
d G
RA
CE
gro
un
dw
ate
r d
eri
ve
d d
ata
fo
r B
akh
teg
an
basin
, 2002–2011
. (A
) V
ari
ati
on
in i
n-s
itu
gro
un
dw
ate
r vo
lum
e (Δ
S)
co
mp
are
d w
ith
net
mo
nth
ly p
recip
itati
on
vo
lum
e (
WB)
an
d (
B)
va
ria
tio
n i
n g
rou
nd
wa
ter
vo
lum
e
(ΔS
) co
mp
are
d w
ith
GR
AC
E g
rou
nd
wa
ter-
deri
ved
wate
r m
ass v
ari
ati
on
(G
WM
I) (U
nd
er
CC
BY
lic
en
se f
rom
Pap
er
I ©
2019 A
uth
ors
).

65
5 Discussion
5.1 Fars province
The number of different climate types in Fars province decreased during the 40-
year study period, which is a clear indication of climate change in the province.
The Emberger index showed that the occurrence of hyper-arid climate type
increased in the province over the period. Thus, the climate type analysis indicated
a reduction in renewable water availability, but there was no significant reduction
in precipitation volume in the corresponding period. The reduction in water
resources observed in the province could be related to meteorological droughts in
later years. Based on the SPI values, it was found that meteorological drought was
a non-stationary stochastic phenomenon in trend analysis for the province. There
was a clear negative trend in the streamflow data, indicating hydrological drought,
with a significant lowering of groundwater level in recent decades. Based on the
SDI values, there was a clear hydrological drought after 1997. The irrigated area
continued increasing, to peak in 2006 at the greatest area in the history of the
province (Paper III). Considering the surface water depletion observed, the
expansion of 400,000 hectares in the irrigated area between 1997 and 2006 was
based on groundwater resources. This overexploitation of groundwater resources,
with an average increase of 50 percent in all aquifers, exerted more pressure on the
overall resource, leading to declines in groundwater level in major aquifers. The
metrological droughts occurring from 2006 onwards led to further decreases in the
rainfed area in the province, reaching 20 percent of the total farmed area,
accelerating hydrological drought occurrence, reducing groundwater recharge by
half, and increasing groundwater overexploitation. For these reasons, the
agricultural drought that started in 2006 resulted in a significant decrease in farmed
area in the province in later years, with an average decrease of 20,000 hectares
annually.
Previous studies have shown that droughts are usually related to human
activities rather than a force majeure, and can be avoided with proper management
(Hervás-Gámez & Delgado-Ramos, 2019; Paper III). In Fars province,
overexploitation of water resources by 50 percent, led to increase occurrence of
hydrological drought starting from 1997 by 30 percent. In the period from 1997–
2016, hydrological drought was observed in 72% of years, while meteorological
drought was less frequent, occurring in 40% of years. In the earlier period 1977–

66
1996, hydrological drought occurred in 42% of years, and more than 75% of the
gauging stations in the province showed a positive trend in streamflow. Thus water
usage before 1997 was sustainable and did not exceed the renewal capacity of the
water resources, whereas it exceeded the renewal capacity after 1997 by 50 percent
and became unsustainable usage. Groundwater resources became the main water
resources in the province after 1997 and they started depleting due to overuse. With
severe depletion of surface water and groundwater resources, the farmed area
decreased after 2006. The decrease in rainfed farmed area, from 41% of total area
in the first decade of the study period to 20% in the last decade, is another indicator
of unsustainable use of water resources, increasing the occurrence of hydrological
drought. These factors led in turn to agricultural drought and a decrease in farmed
area. The increased occurrence of metrological drought in later years contributed
further to the water shortage, as drought years doubled in the last decade. This
meant that groundwater resources could not keep on compensating for the water
shortage in the same way as they did e.g., in the dry year of 1990, when the irrigated
area was smaller.
The increasingly dry climate, increased irrigated area, and excess of water
demand over water supply led to an unsustainable tipping point. The unsustainable
use of water resources was confirmed by depletion in surface water, as Bakhtegan
Lake reached complete dryness (Paper I) and groundwater resources reaching 50
meters depletion in some aquifers. As groundwater resources are considered to be
an important reserve for drought periods in arid and semi-arid climate zones, the
Overexploitation of these resources can lead to many socioeconomic and
environmental impacts. This impacts can be summarize as: land subsidence (Hojjati
& Bostani, 2010), dryness of major lakes (Paper I), abandonment of rural areas
(Bastani, Najafpour & Javani, 2016), depression in rural farmers (Zarafshani,
Gorgievski & Zamani, 2007) and food shortages for local households (Karpisheh,
2010).
Overall, three stages were identified in Fars province in south-western Iran in
the 40-year study period. The first stage, between 1977 and 1996, was a period of
sustainable usage of water resources and a sustainable ratio of 40:60 between
rainfed and irrigated areas. In this period, exploitation of groundwater resources
only occurred in periods of insecure water resources, i.e., meteorological droughts,
and groundwater reserves were replenished in wet years. During this period, the
farmed area decreased by an average of 40% during dry years. Water usage did not
exceed the renewable water resources volume, and hydrological drought was a
stochastic phenomenon that occurred randomly. The sustainable usage of water

67
resources was not affected by climate variability and meteorological droughts. The
second stage, between 1996 and 2006, saw a transition from sustainable to
unsustainable water resources usage. Total farmed area reached an all-time peak
and high-yielding irrigated area increased to 80% of the farmed area, mainly using
groundwater resources. The economic revenue of farmers increased, but average
water demand has doubled. This period witnessed a considerable decrease in
groundwater table level with an average of 1.2 meters annually, altering the
interaction between surface water and groundwater by surface water recharge from
groundwater. The reduction in streamflow by 45 percent, and increased intensity of
hydrological drought by 30 percent led to unsustainable water usage. In the third
stage, between 2006 and 2015, unsustainable usage of water resources culminated
in a reduction in farmed area due to water resources depletion and overexploitation
of groundwater with deeper wells and higher-energy pumping. River flow was at
its lowest, causing serious problems for the volume of hydraulic structures. The
insecurity in the agricultural and water sectors led to an increase in internal
migration in Iran from rural areas to cities (Keshavarz et al., 2013). The water
resource depletion also led to environmental impacts like lake and wetland
desiccation, land subsidence, and desertification (Hojjati & Bostani, 2010; Paper I).
While it cannot be stated that all of Fars province is now in stage three, many of its
regions are. Decision makers for the province should move water usage toward
sustainability at greater efficiency than the current 33 percent, as water usage for
irrigation must become effective and farmers should select crops more suitable for
arid zones, with lower water demand per hectare. Smallholder farmers should be
supplied with information about optimal seeding and harvesting times for each crop
type (Roozbeh, 2020). Groundwater must be reserved as a vital resources to cope
with climate variability.
5.2 Zayanderud basin
A similar pattern emerged in Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province, central Iran,
with discharge and groundwater levels declining considerably following the
introduction of full irrigation schemes in the 1970s and 1980s. From the year 1980
the groundwater exploitation reached an average of 365 Mm3 annually, with a
constant annual drop of 1 to 2.5 meters in the groundwater level. The Zayanderud
river discharge decreased 80 percent, reaching zero in many occasions. On many
occasions in recent decades, the water flow from the Zagros Mountains reached
zero and no water reached Gavkhuni wetland at the end of the Zayanderud River.

68
With the inflow volume reaching zero, Gavkhuni wetland dried up completely in
winter 2009. The average depletion in total water resources in the basin was
estimated to be 1350 Mm3 annually from 1981 till 2015. With the expansion of
irrigated area, water demand always exceeded the water available, even with a
constant increase in water supply through inter-basin transfer, where e.g., 590 Mm3
of water were diverted from the Kuhrang River to Zayanderud basin (Abrishamchi
& Tajrishy, 2005). Completion of the Behesht-Abad tunnel brought an extra 700
Mm3 downstream from the Chadgen dam (Doostmohammadi, Jafari & Asghari,
2015). Despite all these efforts, the demand for water outstripped the supply. There
was an initial plan for the irrigated area in the basin to reach 200,000 hectares by
the 1990s (Molle, 2009). The peak irrigated area achieved was 41,500 hectares. As
the agricultural expansion in the basin had a direct impact on surface water
resources, there was an increase in the hydraulic drought intensity. After 1980, the
occurrence of hydraulic drought increased by 40%. Negative SPI minus SDI values,
indicating more severe hydrological droughts compared with precipitation levels,
increased by 40% in the 1970s and 20% in the 1980s. On average, hydraulic
drought appeared in 60% of study years and this increased to 72% after 1980.
Hydrological drought had a direct environmental impact in Zayanderud basin, with
the constant dryness of the Gavkhuni wetland (Paper II). The expansion in irrigated
area also had a direct impact on groundwater levels, as groundwater became the
main source of water for irrigation, rather than the traditional qanats. Groundwater
drilling and pumping permits are issued by the central administration, which lacks
knowledge of the local hydrological situation (Molle, 2009). In period of 35 years,
1981 till 2015, groundwater data collected in-situ showed declines in the levels in
all major aquifers. The greatest depletion has been in the Najafabad aquifer (2.5 m
annually), because of large-scale conversion of undeveloped land to irrigated land.
In other major agricultural aquifers such as Isfahan, North Mayhar, and Damaneh,
the annual depletion has been between 1 and 1.5 m. On average, 365 Mm3 of
groundwater are pumped annually for irrigation purposes in Zayanderud basin. As
in Fars province, groundwater is used to compensate for deficiency of surface water
resources, as 60 percent of the irrigation water sources is from groundwater leading
to unsustainable exploitation of groundwater resources.
5.3 Gavkhuni wetland area
Normalized difference water index (NDWI) values proved in previous studies to
be reliable for monitoring surface water bodies (Nair & Babu, 2016; Sarp &

69
Ozcelik, 2017; Dai et al., 2020). For Gavkhuni wetland, the 0.5 NDWI threshold
was congruent with real inflow in 60% of cases. Although the highest recorded
capacity of the wetland was 480 km2, the average area during the study period was
350 km2. With frequent hydrological drought and intensive water usage reducing
streamflow, a minimal amount of river water reaches the wetland downstream, as
the flows downstream reached less than 5 percent of the upstream flow. According
to a previous study and indicator, the volume of water required for Gavkhuni
wetland to sustain its area is 244 Mm3 annually, including the evaporation rate
(Sarhadi & Soltani, 2013). At the Varzaneh hydrometric station located on the inlet
to Gavkhuni wetland, the annual inflow to the wetland between 1985 and 2015 was
only 117 Mm3. This resulted in a constant decrease in surface area and occasional
drying out of the wetland after the year 2009, which is considered an important site
for migratory birds and is registered under the Ramsar Convention (Gohari et al.,
2013).
5.4 Bakhtegan basin
GRACE satellite data can help reach general conclusions about total water storage
and aquifer conditions (Joodaki & Swenson, 2014). Based on GRACE data, the
estimated total water loss was 2.4 km3, or 7.6 mm annually, in Bakhtegan basin.
This total water loss was confirmed by previous studies regarding surface water
depletion values for Lake Bakhtegan (Paper I), and the SPI and SDI values. The
GRACE data also indicated a groundwater depletion scenario in the basin, which
was agreeable by the in-situ measurements, and showed similar trend.
Although in-situ data are still considered the most reliable data source for
monitoring surface water and groundwater depletion, this thesis demonstrated that
the GRACE data were able to confirm the water volume loss during the study
period. The GRACE and total water volume loss were coherent in most of the cases.
The monthly net precipitation data derived from the water balance equation showed
a good fit of 90 percent with the GRACE data. There were some discrepancies in
the monthly data, which can be related to the small basin area (31,511 km2),
hydraulic interactions with neighboring catchments, or changes in soil porosity,
which can delay the water mass change in the basin. Part of the variation may also
be attributable to the geometry and geology of the aquifer (Paper I). However, it
was still possible to draw general conclusions about the hydrological situation of
the basin, while considering the uncertainties summarized by Longuevergne et al.
(2010). They stated that to get precise groundwater depletion data, the basin area

70
must be higher than 200,000 km2 (Longuevergne, Scanlon & Wilson, 2010). In
Bakhtegan, even with smaller aquifer size, the water mass volume loss was
coherent with more than 90 percent of the cases, and the groundwater depth lost
was coherent in 60 percent of the cases. This coherence difference between
GRACE and in-situ data is related to the error in GRACE data derivation, scaled
GRACE measurement error, leakage correction error, and scaling uncertainty.

71
6 Conclusions and further research
This thesis assessed the effects of agriculture expansion and associated
unsustainable water resources exploitation in the agricultural sector in central Iran
on the occurrence and effects of meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural
droughts. The results showed that overexploitation of surface and groundwater
resources were directly linked to the increased occurrence of both hydrological and
agricultural droughts, and exacerbated the effects of meteorological droughts.
Surface and groundwater depletion have had direct effects on local residents
especially in downstream water bodies. Methodology was developed to evaluate
climate change and variability based on two main elements of the Emberger aridity
index, humidity influence factor (HIF) and climate influence factor (CIF). Two new
indices were developed for analysis of agricultural drought based on farming type:
overall agricultural drought index (OADI) and agricultural drought index (ADI).
The study areas were Fars province, with a detailed study in Bakhtegan basin, and
Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province, all of which are very important agricultural
regions in Iran. It was shown that the number of different climate types in Fars
province decreased from 20 in the period from 1987–1996 to 14 in the period from
2007–2016 due to change in precipitation volume. Over the 40-year period studied
in this thesis, the hyper-arid climate type increased in occurrence from 32.3% of
years in the first decade to 44.4% in the last decade due to increase in the mean
temperature.
In general, 75% of years between 1977 and 2016 were normal and wet years
meteorologically, distributed uniformly. The frequency of hydrological and
agricultural droughts increased in later years (between 2006 and 2015). Fars
province was identified as passing through three main stages in the 40-year study
period: a sustainable water usage phase where demand was less than the resource
renewal capacity; a transitional phase of water usage characterized by an increase
in irrigated area, groundwater depletion, and hydrological drought; and an
unsustainable phase where there is a lack of water resources and climatological,
hydrological, and agricultural drought.
Zayanderud basin showed less climate variation, with the cold and hyper-arid
climate type occurring in 57.5% of years and with 90% wet and normal years during
the study period. However, this did not reduce the water depletion in the basin,
which displayed a similar pattern as observed in Fars province. The water depletion
was again directly linked with the expansion of irrigated area, to 41,500 hectares in
year 1990 from 20,000 hectares in the 1970s. Water from the Zayanderud River

72
was extracted along its length, and the flow ultimately reached zero downstream,
resulting in complete drying of Gavkhuni wetland. The groundwater level depletion
reached 50 m in some aquifers with a constant level decrease of 0.6 m annually. In
Bakhtegan basin in Fars province, the groundwater level depletion reached an
average of 10 m in 10 years, with some smaller aquifers reaching 30 m. The
downstream flow in the basin’s main river (Kor River) fell to 60% lower than
upstream flow and reached zero on most occasions after 2006, leading to Lake
Bakhtegan drying up.
In general, it can be concluded that the high water consumption in Fars
province and in Zayanderud basin in Esfahan province, is due to the expansion of
the irrigated areas and the over exploitation of the available water resources. To
ease the situation, future research must focus on the following:
i. Future research should focus on increasing water productivity and
increasing yield per m3 water consumed in irrigation. It is also
important to understand what motivates farmers to adopt new
technologies and practices.
ii. Farmers must be educated about crop, land, and water management in
different circumstances, especially farmers with access to poor water
quality who risk decreasing yield rates and increasing soil salinity.
iii. Irrigation water use must be directly related to crop value, e.g.,
vegetables are a good irrigation investment because of higher quality
and price.
iv. In drought years, irrigation must be applied only to overcome the
direct effects of drought on crops.
v. Remote sensing data could become a major aid in water resources and
agricultural management, as they are cheaper to obtain and reliable.
Combined remote sensing and in-situ measured data could be used to
track changes in crop and water resources.
vi. Irrigation efficiency must be continually compared with that in other
irrigation projects in similar arid and semi-arid zones, for data
comparison and to learn from experiences elsewhere.
vii. As April is usually the month with the highest streamflow rate, annual
water allowance calendars must be drawn up depending on the
precipitation rate in the previous months and expected
evapotranspiration rate in summer. Water allowances must be
decreased in drought years.

73
viii. Basin-level surveys are required to determine the total number of
groundwater extraction wells and their depth, quality, and drilling date.
The data obtained can help optimize combined usage of surface and
groundwater, and map the current detailed groundwater situation.
Wells that reached alarming levels or quality must be closed,
especially in drought years.
ix. The technical and economic feasibility of transbasin water diversion
must be reconsidered. Planning more sustainable water usage will
have better environmental and economic impacts than water diversion.
Previous experiences show that increasing the water supply only
increases demand.
x. Salinity development in soil layers due to irrigation and drought
occurrence must be mapped and the effects of increased salinity on
groundwater quality must be determined.
xi. Water institutes must set water priorities for different economic sectors
in times of drought. The highest priority must be providing potable
water in rural areas. Water consumption in other industrial and
agricultural sectors must then be ranked from most to least important.

74

75
List of references
Abdi, O., Shirvani, Z., & Buchroithner, M.F. (2019). Forest drought-induced diversity of Hyrcanian individual-tree mortality affected by meteorological and hydrological droughts by analyzing moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer products and spatial autoregressive models over northeast Iran. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 275, 265–276.
Abou Zaki, N., Torabi Haghighi, A., Rossi, P. M., Xenarios, S., & Kløve, B. (2018). An index-based approach to assess the water availability for irrigated agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Water, 10(7), 896.
Abrishamchi, A., & Tajrishi, M. (2005). Interbasin water transfer in Iran. In Water conservation, reuse, and recycling: proceeding of an Iranian American workshop, 252–271. Washingon, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ahmadi, K., Hoseinpour, R.E., Gholizadeh, H., Hatami, F., Mohammadnia Afrouzi, S., & Abdshah, H. (2015). Evaluation of 36 years cultivation in Iran 1978–2013. Ministry of Agriculture, Jahad.
Akbari, M., Toomanian, N., Droogers, P., Bastiaanssen, W., & Gieske, A. (2007). Monitoring irrigation performance in Esfahan, Iran, using NOAA satellite imagery. Agricultural Water Management, 88(1–3), 99–109.
Aquastat. (2015). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved from http:// http://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/databases/maindatabase/
Bannayan, M., Sanjani, S., Alizadeh, A., Lotfabadi, S., & Mohamadian, A. (2010). Association between climate indices, aridity index, and rainfed crop yield in northeast of Iran. Field Crops Research, 118(2), 105–114.
Bannayan, M., Lotfabadi, S.S., Sanjani, S., Mohamadian, A. & Aghaalikhani, M. (2011). Effects of precipitation and temperature on crop production variability in northeast Iran. International Journal of Biometeorology, 55(3), 387–401.
Bastani, A., Najafpour, B., & Javani, K. (2016). Analysis the effects of drought on rural settlements instability in Drab villages township. Journal of Regional Planning, 6(21), 155–166.
Bijani, M., & Hayati, D. (2015). Farmers’ perceptions toward agricultural water conflict: the case of Doroodzan dam irrigation network, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(3), 561–575.
Bureau for Design and Development and Farmers Participation [BDDFP] (2011). Atlas Report: Bakhtegan-Maharloo Basin. Annual Report. Fars, Iran.
Butt, A., Shabbir, R., Ahmad, S. S., & Aziz, N. (2015). Land use change mapping and analysis using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad, Pakistan. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 251–259.
Castle, S. L., Thomas, B. F., Reager, J. T., Rodell, M., Swenson, S. C., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2014). Groundwater depletion during drought threatens future water security of the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(16), 5904–5911.

76
Chander, G., Helder, D. L., Markham, B. L., Dewald, J. D., Kaita, E., Thome, K. J., ... & Ruggles, T. A. (2004). Landsat-5 TM reflective-band absolute radiometric calibration. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(12), 2747–2760.
Chartzoulakis, K., & Bertaki, M. (2015). Sustainable water management in agriculture under climate change. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 4, 88–98.
Chen, J., Li, J., Zhang, Z., & Ni, S. (2014). Long-term groundwater variations in Northwest India from satellite gravity measurements. Global and Planetary Change, 116, 130–138.
Chen, T., De Jeu, R. A. M., Liu, Y. Y., Van der Werf, G. R., & Dolman, A. J. (2014). Using satellite based soil moisture to quantify the water driven variability in NDVI: A case study over mainland Australia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 140, 330–338.
Cheng, M., Tapley, B. D., & Ries, J. C. (2013). Deceleration in the Earth's oblateness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(2), 740–747.
Choubin, B., Malekian, A., & Golshan, M. (2016). Application of several data-driven techniques to predict a standardized precipitation index. Atmósfera, 29(2), 121-128.
Cooley, H., Donnelly, K., Phurisamban, R., & Subramanian, M. (2015). Impacts of California’s ongoing drought: Agriculture. Oakland: Pacific Institute. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rapichan_Phurisamban2/publication/.
DAAC, O. (2011). Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center (ORNL DAAC). MODIS subsetted land products, Collection, 5.
Dabral, P. P., Baithuri, N., & Pandey, A. (2008). Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resources Management, 22(12), 1783–1798.
Dai, X., Yang, X., Wang, M., Gao, Y., Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2020). The dynamic change of Bosten lake area in response to climate in the past 30 years. Water, 12(1), 4.
Dashtpagerdi, M. M., Kousari, M. R., Vagharfard, H., Ghonchepour, D., Hosseini, M. E., & Ahani, H. (2015). An investigation of drought magnitude trend during 1975–2005 in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(3), 1231–1244.
Davranche, M., Gruau, G., Dia, A., Marsac, R., Pédrot, M., & Pourret, O. (2015). Biogeochemical factors affecting rare earth element distribution in shallow wetland groundwater. Aquatic Geochemistry, 21(2-4), 197–215.
Doell, P., Mueller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T., & Eicker, A. (2014). Global‐scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resources Research, 50(7), 5698–5720.
Doostmohammadi, M., Jafari, A., & Asghari, O. (2015). Geostatistical modeling of uniaxial compressive strength along the axis of the Behesht-Abad tunnel in Central Iran. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74(3), 789–802.
Emberger, L. (1932). Sur une formule climatique et ses applications en botanique. La Météorologie, 92, 1–10.
Fahmi, H. (2012). An Overview of Water Resources Management in the IR of Iran. Ministry of Energy of Iran: Tehran, Iran.

77
Famiglietti, J. S. (2014). The global groundwater crisis. Nature Climate Change, 4(11), 945–948.
Fieldhouse, D.J. & Palmer, W.C. (1965). Meteorological and agricultural drought. University of Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin, 353, 1–71.
Frenken, K. (2013). Irrigation in central Asia in figures: Aquastat survey 2012. FAO water reports, (39), 228.
Ghumman, A. R., Ghazaw, Y. M., Niazi, M. F., & Hashmi, H. N. (2011). Impact assessment of subsurface drainage on waterlogged and saline lands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 172(1-4), 189–197.
Gohari, A., Eslamian, S., Mirchi, A., Abedi-Koupaei, J., Bavani, A. M., & Madani, K. (2013). Water transfer as a solution to water shortage: a fix that can backfire. Journal of Hydrology, 491, 23–39.
Gohari, A., Eslamian, S., Abedi-Koupaei, J., Bavani, A. M., Wang, D., & Madani, K. (2013). Climate change impacts on crop production in Iran's Zayandeh-Rud River Basin. Science of the Total Environment, 442, 405–419.
Guo, Y., Huang, S., Huang, Q., Wang, H., Wang, L., & Fang, W. (2019). Copulas-based bivariate socioeconomic drought dynamic risk assessment in a changing environment. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 1052–1064.
Haghighi, A. T., & Keshtkaran, P. (2008). Methods of Facing with Drought in Fars Province-Iran. In Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Danubian Countries on Hydrological Forecasting and Hydrological Bases of Water Management, Bled, Slovenia, 2–4.
Haghighi, A. T., & Kløve, B. (2017). Design of environmental flow regimes to maintain lakes and wetlands in regions with high seasonal irrigation demand. Ecological Engineering, 100, 120–129.
Harandi, M. F., & de Vries, M. J. (2014). An appraisal of the qualifying role of hydraulic heritage systems: a case study of Qanats in central Iran. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 14(6), 1124–1132.
Hedayat, S. Zarei, H., Radmanesh, F., Mohammadi, A.S. (2017) Study of groundwater resources condition in plains of Bakhtegan - Maharloo basin. World Rural Observations, 9, 1–5.
Hereher, M. E., & Ismael, H. (2016). The application of remote sensing data to diagnose soil degradation in the Dakhla depression–Western Desert, Egypt. Geocarto International, 31(5), 527–543.
Hervás-Gámez, C., & Delgado-Ramos, F. (2019). Drought management planning policy: From Europe to Spain. Sustainability, 11(7), 1862.
Hojjati, M. H., & Boustani, F. (2010). An assessment of groundwater crisis in Iran, case study: Fars province. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 70, 476–480.
Huang, S., Miao, Y., Zhao, G., Yuan, F., Ma, X., Tan, C., & Bareth, G. (2015). Satellite remote sensing-based in-season diagnosis of rice nitrogen status in Northeast China. Remote Sensing, 7(8), 10646–10667.

78
Huang, S., Qiang H., Jianxia C., Guoyong L., & Li Xing. (2015). "The response of agricultural drought to meteorological drought and the influencing factors: a case study in the Wei River Basin, China." Agricultural Water Management 159, 45–54.
Hunt, E. R., Hively, W. D., Fujikawa, S. J., Linden, D. S., Daughtry, C. S., & McCarty, G. W. (2010). Acquisition of NIR-green-blue digital photographs from unmanned aircraft for crop monitoring. Remote Sensing, 2(1), 290–305.
Jawak, S. D., & Luis, A. J. (2014). A semiautomatic extraction of Antarctic lake features using WorldView-2 imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 80(10), 939–952.
Joodaki, G., Wahr, J., & Swenson, S. (2014). Estimating the human contribution to groundwater depletion in the Middle East, from GRACE data, land surface models, and well observations. Water Resources Research, 50(3), 2679–2692.
Joshi, K. (2019). The impact of drought on human capital in rural India. Environment and Development Economics, 24(4), 413–436.
Karami, E., & Keshavarz, M. (2010). Sociology of sustainable agriculture. In Sociology, organic farming, climate change and soil science, 19–40. Dordrecht: Springer.
Karpisheh, L. (2010). Iranian farmer’s attitudes and management strategies dealing with drought: A case study in Fars province. World Applied Sciences Journal, 10(10), 1122–1128.
Keshavarz, M., Karami, E., & Vanclay, F. (2013). The social experience of drought in rural Iran. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 120–129.
Keshavarz, M., Karami, E., & Lahsaeizadeh, A. (2013). Factors influencing the rural migrations resulting from drought: A case study in Fars Province. Village and Development, 16(1), 113–127.
Khaki, M. (2020). Groundwater depletion over Iran. Satellite Remote Sensing in Hydrological Data Assimilation, 183–212.
Khan, S. I., Hong, Y., Wang, J., Yilmaz, K. K., Gourley, J. J., Adler, R. F., ... & Irwin, D. (2010). Satellite remote sensing and hydrologic modeling for flood inundation mapping in Lake Victoria basin: Implications for hydrologic prediction in ungauged basins. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(1), 85–95.
Konikow, L. F. (2011). Contribution of global groundwater depletion since 1900 to sea‐level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(17), 1–5
Kussul, N., Lavreniuk, M., Skakun, S., & Shelestov, A. (2017). Deep learning classification of land cover and crop types using remote sensing data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(5), 778–782.
Lamchin, M., Lee, J. Y., Lee, W. K., Lee, E. J., Kim, M., Lim, C. H., ... & Kim, S. R. (2016). Assessment of land cover change and desertification using remote sensing technology in a local region of Mongolia. Advances in Space Research, 57(1), 64–77.
Landerer, F. W., & Swenson, S. C. (2012). Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates. Water Resources Research, 48(4), 1–11.
Li, X., & Troy, T. J. (2018). Changes in rainfed and irrigated crop yield response to climate in the western US. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 1–11.

79
Lloyd‐Hughes, B., & Saunders, M. A. (2002). A drought climatology for Europe. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 22(13), 1571–1592.
Longuevergne, L., Scanlon, B. R., & Wilson, C. R. (2010). GRACE Hydrological estimates for small basins: Evaluating processing approaches on the High Plains Aquifer, USA. Water Resources Research, 46(11), 1–15.
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 179–183.
Madani, K. (2014). Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4(4), 315–328.
Marino, G., Pernice, F., Marra, F. P., & Caruso, T. (2016). Validation of an online system for the continuous monitoring of tree water status for sustainable irrigation managements in olive (Olea europaea L.). Agricultural Water Management, 177, 298–307.
Martínez Aldaya, M., Custodio, E., Llamas, R., Fernández, M. F., García, J., & Ródenas, M. Á. (2019). An academic analysis with recommendations for water management and planning at the basin scale: a review of water planning in the Segura River Basin. Science of The Total Environment, 755–768.
Mishra A., K., & Singh V. P. (2010). A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 391(1), 202–216.
Molle, F., & Wester, P. (2009). River basin trajectories: societies, environments and development. International Water Management Institute, 1–20.
Mohebbi, M. R., Saeedi, R., Montazeri, A., Vaghefi, K. A., Labbafi, S., Oktaie, S. & Mohagheghian, A. (2013). Assessment of water quality in groundwater resources of Iran using a modified drinking water quality index (DWQI). Ecological Indicators, 30, 28–34.
Moradi, H. R., Rajabi, M., & Faragzadeh, M. (2011). Investigation of meteorological drought characteristics in Fars province, Iran. Catena, 84, 35–46.
Motagh, M., Shamshiri, R., Haghighi, M. H., Wetzel, H. U., Akbari, B., Nahavandchi, H. & Arabi, S. (2017). Quantifying groundwater exploitation induced subsidence in the Rafsanjan plain, southeastern Iran, using InSAR time-series and in situ measurements. Engineering Geology, 218, 134–151.
Nair, P. K., & Babu, D. S. (2016). Spatial shrinkage of Vembanad Lake, South West India during 1973-2015 using NDWI and MNDWI. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(7), 319–7064.
Nafarzadegan, A. R., Zadeh, M. R., Kherad, M., Ahani, H., Gharehkhani, A., Karampoor, M. A., & Kousari, M. R. (2012). Drought area monitoring during the past three decades in Fars province, Iran. Quaternary international, 250, 27–36.
Noshadi, M., & Ghafourian, A. (2016). Groundwater quality analysis using multivariate statistical techniques (case study: Fars province, Iran). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(7), 419.

80
Nourani, V., & Mano, A. (2007). Semi‐distributed flood runoff model at the subcontinental scale for southwestern Iran. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 21(23), 3173–3180.
Ong, W. J., Tan, L. L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S. T., & Chai, S. P. (2016). Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability? Chemical Reviews, 116(12), 7159–7329.
Pishkar AR. (2015) Fars agriculture census, Agricultural Organization of Fars. Retrieved from http://fajo.ir/site/images/article/amar/amarnameh94.pdf.
Poff, N. L., Brown, C. M., Grantham, T. E., Matthews, J. H., Palmer, M. A., Spence, C. M., & Baeza, A. (2016). Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nature Climate Change, 6(1), 25–34.
Rasoulzadeh, A., & Mousavi, S. (2007). Study of groundwater recharge in the vicinity of Tashk Lake area. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transaction Engineering, 31(5), 509–521.
Rodell, M., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2002). The potential for satellite-based monitoring of groundwater storage changes using GRACE: the High Plains aquifer, Central US. Journal of Hydrology, 263(1-4), 245–256.
Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U. E. A., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng, C. J., ... & Entin, J. K. (2004). The global land data assimilation system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85(3), 381–394.
Rodell, M., & Beaudoing K.H. (2007). GLDAS CLM land surface model L4 monthly 1.0× 1.0 degree. Version 001. Technical report, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GESDISC), Greenbelt.
Roozbeh, M. (2020). Evaluation of no-till drill performance under various residue management methods in wheat cropping in the south of Iran. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 22(1), 92–99.
Roy, D. P., Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., ... & Scambos, T. A. (2014). Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sensing of Environment, 145, 154–172.
Saatsaz, M. (2019). A historical investigation on water resources management in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1749–1785.
Sarp, G., & Ozcelik, M. (2017). Water body extraction and change detection using time series: A case study of Lake Burdur, Turkey. Journal of Taibah University for Science, 11(3), 381–391.
Salamí, E., Barrado, C., & Pastor, E. (2014). UAV flight experiments applied to the remote sensing of vegetated areas. Remote Sensing, 6(11), 11051–11081.
Sarhadi, A., & Soltani, S. (2013). Determination of water requirements of the Gavkhuni wetland, Iran: A hydrological approach. Journal of Arid Environments, 98, 27–40.
Shahabfar, A., & Eitzinger, J. (2011). Agricultural drought monitoring in semi-arid and arid areas using MODIS data. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(4), 403–414.

81
Soltani, G., & Saboohi, M. (2008). Economic and social impacts of groundwater overdraft: The case of Iran. In Paper submitted to 15th ERF annual conference, Cairo, Egypt (pp. 23–25).
Stisen, S., Jensen, K. H., Sandholt, I., & Grimes, D. I. (2008). A remote sensing driven distributed hydrological model of the Senegal River basin. Journal of Hydrology, 354(1-4), 131–148.
Swenson, S., & Wahr, J. (2006). Estimating large-scale precipitation minus evapotranspiration from GRACE satellite gravity measurements. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7(2), 252–270.
Swenson, S., Chambers, D., & Wahr, J. (2008). Estimating geocenter variations from a combination of GRACE and ocean model output. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113, 1–12.
Tang, Q., Gao, H., Lu, H., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2009). Remote sensing: hydrology. Progress in Physical Geography, 33(4), 490–509.
Taher, T., Bruns, B., Bamaga, O., Al-Weshali, A., & Van Steenbergen, F. (2012). Local groundwater governance in Yemen: building on traditions and enabling communities to craft new rules. Hydrogeology Journal, 20(6), 1177–1188.
Torabi Farsani, N., Coelho, C., & Costa, C. (2012). Geotourism and geoparks as gateways to socio-cultural sustainability in Qeshm Rural Areas, Iran. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 17(1), 30–48.
Tourian, M. J. (2013). Application of spaceborne geodetic sensors for hydrology. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart Germany.
Valipour, M., & Eslamian, S. (2014). Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using 11 modified temperature-based models. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 4(3), 192–207.
Van Loon, A. F., & Van Lanen, H. A. (2013). Making the distinction between water scarcity and drought using an observation‐modeling framework. Water Resources Research, 49(3), 1483–1502.
Vishwakarma, B. D., Horwath, M., Devaraju, B., Groh, A., & Sneeuw, N. (2017). A data‐driven approach for repairing the hydrological catchment signal damage due to filtering of GRACE products. Water Resources Research, 53(11), 9824–9844.
Wada, Y., van Beek, L. P., Sperna Weiland, F. C., Chao, B. F., Wu, Y. H., & Bierkens, M. F. (2012). Past and future contribution of global groundwater depletion to sea‐level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(9), 1–6
Wahr, J., & Zhong, S. (2013). Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada. Geophysical Journal International, 192(2), 557–572.
Weiss, M., Jacob, F., & Duveiller, G. (2020). Remote sensing for agricultural applications: A meta-review. Remote Sensing of Environment, 236, 111402.
Wen, L., Rogers, K., Ling, J., & Saintilan, N. (2011). The impacts of river regulation and water diversion on the hydrological drought characteristics in the Lower Murrumbidgee River, Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 405(3-4), 382–391.

82
Wisser, D., Fekete, B. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., & Schumann, A. H. (2010). Reconstructing 20th century global hydrography: a contribution to the Global Terrestrial Network-Hydrology (GTN-H). Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 14(1), 1–25.
World Bank. (2020). Islamic Republic of Iran. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/country/iran-islamic-rep.
Xu, H. J., Wang, X. P., Zhao, C. Y., & Yang, X. M. (2018). Diverse responses of vegetation growth to meteorological drought across climate zones and land biomes in northern China from 1981 to 2014. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 262, 1–13.
Yari, M., Mazareh, A. E., & Mehr, A. S. (2016). A novel cogeneration system for sustainable water and power production by integration of a solar still and PV module. Desalination, 398, 1–11.
Zamani, O., Grundmann, P., Libra, J. A., & Nikouei, A. (2019). Limiting and timing water supply for agricultural production–The case of the Zayandeh-Rud River Basin, Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 222, 322–335.
Zarafshani, K., Gorgievski, M. J., & Zamani, G. H. (2007). Dealing with drought: A comparison of perceptions and coping strategies of Iranian farmers from regions with different drought intensities. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 13(1), 69–80.
Zhao, L., Yang, J., Li, P., Zhao, J., & Zhang, J. (2016). Characterization of the periodic surface in agricuture by the use of polarimetric signatures. In 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 7153–7156.

83
Original publications
I Abou Zaki, N., Haghighi, A.T., Rossi, P.M., Tourian, M.J., & Kløve, B. (2019). Monitoring groundwater storage depletion using gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) data in Bakhtegan catchment, Iran. Water 11(7), 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071456
II Abou Zaki, N., Haghighi, A.T., Rossi, P.M., Tourian, M.J., Bakhshaee A. & Kløve, B. (2020). Evaluating impacts of irrigation and drought on rivers, groundwater and a terminal wetland in the Zayanderud basin, Iran. Water 12(5), 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051302
III Haghighi, A.T., Abou Zaki, N., Rossi, P.M., Noori, R., Hekmatzadeh, A.A., Saremi, H. & Kløve, B. (2020). Unsustainability syndrome – from meteorological to agricultural drought in arid and semi-arid regions. Water 12(3), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030838
Reprinted with permission under CC BY license from Authors (Papers I, II, and
III).
Original publications are not included in the electronic version of the dissertation.

84

A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S O U L U E N S I S
Book orders:Virtual book store
http://verkkokauppa.juvenesprint.fi
S E R I E S C T E C H N I C A
743. Alcaraz López, Onel Luis (2020) Resource allocation for machine-typecommunication : from massive connectivity to ultra-reliable low-latency
744. Frondelius, Tero (2020) Development of methods in engine design process
745. Rissanen, Jouni (2020) Utilization of peat-wood fly ash from fluidized bedcombustion as supplementary cementitious material
746. Särestöniemi, Mariella (2020) UWB in-body propagation and radio channelcharacteristics for wireless body area network applications
747. Ashraf, Faisal Bin (2020) River regimes and energy demand interactions in Nordicrivers
748. Kuula, Seppo (2020) Continuous co-creation of knowledge-intensive businessservices
749. Mustonen, Erno (2020) Vertical productisation over product lifecycle : co-marketing through a joint commercial product portfolio
750. Halttula, Heikki (2020) Enhancing data utilisation in the construction projectlifecycle through early involvement and integration
751. Nguyen, Hoang (2020) Ettringite-based binder from ladle slag : from hydration toits fiber-reinforced composites
752. Jahromi, Sahba S. (2020) Single photon avalanche detector devices and circuits forminiaturized 3D imagers
753. Xu, Yingyue (2020) Computational modeling for visual attention analysis
754. Saarela, Martti (2020) Growth management of eHealth service start-ups
755. Kolli, Satish (2020) Sensitization in austenitic stainless steels : quantitativeprediction considering multicomponent thermodynamic and mass balance effects
756. Ali, Mohammed (2020) Development of low-cost CrNiMoWMnV ultrahigh-strength steel with high impact toughness for advanced engineering applications
757. Khan, Hamza (2020) Resource scheduling and cell association in 5G-V2X
758. Miettinen, Jyrki & Visuri, Ville-Valtteri & Fabritius, Timo (2020) Chromium-,copper-, molybdenum-, and nickel-containing thermodynamic descriptions of theFe–Al– Cr–Cu–Mn–Mo–Ni–Si system for modeling the solidification of steels
759. Alasalmi, Tuomo (2020) Uncertainty of classification on limited data
760. Kinnunen, Hannu (2020) Studies for the development, validation, and applicationof wearable technology in the assessment of human health-related behavior
C761etukansi.fm Page 2 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:27 AM

UNIVERSITY OF OULU P .O. Box 8000 F I -90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND
A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S O U L U E N S I S
University Lecturer Tuomo Glumoff
University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen
Postdoctoral researcher Jani Peräntie
University Lecturer Anne Tuomisto
University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen
Planning Director Pertti Tikkanen
Professor Jari Juga
University Lecturer Anu Soikkeli
University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen
Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala
ISBN 978-952-62-2720-7 (Paperback)ISBN 978-952-62-2721-4 (PDF)ISSN 0355-3213 (Print)ISSN 1796-2226 (Online)
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
U N I V E R S I TAT I S O U L U E N S I SACTAC
TECHNICA
OULU 2020
C 761
Nizar Abou Zaki
THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE EXPANSION IN WATER RESOURCES DEPLETIONIN CENTRAL IRAN
UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL;UNIVERSITY OF OULU,FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY
C 761
AC
TAN
izar Abou Z
akiC761etukansi.fm Page 1 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:27 AM