“Sicut in caelo et in terra”

39
Coalescence of two black holes (credits: SXS) “Sicut in caelo et in terra” As in heaven and on earth Data representaons for seismic and gravitaonal waves Eric Chassande-Mon Astroparcule et Cosmologie APC CNRS/IN2P3 Univ Paris Diderot

Transcript of “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Page 1: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Coalescence of two black holes (credits: SXS)

“Sicut in caelo et in terra”As in heaven and on earth

Data representations for

seismic and gravitational waves

Eric Chassande-Mottin

Astroparticule et Cosmologie APC CNRS/IN2P3 Univ Paris Diderot

Page 2: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Birth of wavelet analysis

Collaboration with Jean Morlet with application to seismic data

I. Daubechies, Where do wavelets come from? A personal point of view

Page 3: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

From earth- to spacetime- quakes

● Seismic wavesdensity perturbations propagating as sound waves in the rock bed

Produced e.g., in Earth-quakes or by man-made explosions for oil exploration

● Gravitational wavespropagating space-time metric perturbations

Consequence of General Relativity

Produced by accelerated masses, e.g., mergers of compact stars

Page 4: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

“Cycle-octave” transform & oil exploration

Goupillaud, Grossman, Morlet, Cycle-Octave and related transforms in seismic signal analysis, Geoexploration, 1984

● Objective: higher resolution in the detection and localization of thin layers of oil reservoirs preserve high frequencies of the seismic echo

● Attenuation due to scattering by successive layers follows a constant-Q lawlarge low freqs from small high freqs

Page 5: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

“L-transform”

Voice transf: log scales

Cycle-octave transf: rescaled time

Goupillaud, Grossman, Morlet, Cycle-Octave and related transforms in seismic signal analysis, Geoexploration, 1984

● Standard data recording: low-pass filter for the “noise-dominated” high freqs

● Change to recording in separate frequency bands → 2D time-frequency representation

● Issues: size of data set/memory, signal recoverydiscretization, inversion

● Connected to coherent state rep of quantum mech.

Page 6: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Simulated signature of a sediment layer

time

octave

time

octave

Analysis ReconstructionReconstruction error

Page 7: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

From earth- to spacetime- quakes

● “Wavefront” reconstruction using a sensor array● Spatial localization of the source of the wave

– Timing measurement → importance of high frequencies

● Signal identification using time-frequency patterns

Similar signal analysis problems → similar solutions

Page 8: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

A primer on gravitational waves

Page 9: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Alain Brillet Thibault Damour

Page 10: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

1915● Space-time is a deformable and dynamical object

● Gravity is a geometrical effect that emerges from space-time curvature

« Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve

JA Wheeler

Page 11: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Gravitational waves (1)

Einstein's equations → wave equation !for small perturbations of flat space-time metric

There are waves of space and time

Those waves are transverse

Page 12: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Gravitational waves (2)

here

time

+

x

General Relativity predicts two polarizations

Gravitational wave amplitude h(t) has no dimension

Page 13: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Black hole binary mergerinspiral merger ringdown

Chirp!

Characteristic waveform signature

Page 14: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

How do we detect gravitational waves?

Page 15: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Michelson interferometer

Page 16: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Michelson interferometer

Page 17: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

LIGO (Etats unis) Virgo (Italie)

Radius of atomic nuclei (x 1000)

Page 18: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

LIGO Handford H1 LIGO Livingston L1 Virgo V1

Quasi-omnidirectional(no pointing, see below)

~3000 km (10 light-ms)

~10000 km (30 light-ms)

Sensitivities during O2H1: 60 Mpc

L1: 80 Mpc

V1: 25 Mpc

BNS range

Page 19: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

O14 months~50 days

coincident

O26 months

~ 100 dayscoincident

VirgoO31 yr from Apr 2019

LIGO Handford H1 LIGO Livingston L1 Virgo V1

LIGO only LIGO & Virgo

~5 TB of science data product

~15 millions segments

Page 20: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

How do we search LIGO and Virgo data?

Page 21: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

What do we search for?Tr

ansi

ent

Per

man

ent

Page 22: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

What do we search for?Tr

ansi

ent

Per

man

ent

With a model“parametric”

Matched filtering

Without a model“non-parametric”

Time-frequencyWavelets

Page 23: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Compact binary mergers

● We have accurate waveform models

15 parameters: masses & spins + geometry

To leading order, the phase is determined by

then by mass ratio, spins, …

– … except in extreme region of parameter space, for instance: high-mass ratio, misaligned spins (→ precession), …

Can be used as “template”

Correlate data with the templates (matched filtering)

chirp mass

Page 24: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Compact binary mergersMatched filtering

Cover expected scenarios(parameter space coverage)

1 point = 1 waveform = 1 filter400 000 filters !

Retain events that occur in coincidence on two or more detectors and come from the

same filter

Dal Canton & Harry, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.01845

Page 25: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Main difficulties

Non-stationarity Non-Gaussianity

“glitches” regularly appearing

Page 26: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Time-frequency searchesTransient signals =

outliers in time-frequency representation

Time (sec)

Fre

quen

cy (

Hz)

Excess power !

Time-frequency representation

Page 27: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Time-frequency searchesCoherent WaveBurst (1)

S. Klimenko et al., arXiv:1511.05999

Time-frequency map• A collection of Wilson transforms at multiple scales• Using the Meyer scaling function

Signal identification by pattern matching ● Clusters of “bright” time-frequency pixels● General relativity is not required – Can detect

unexpected sources

Page 28: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Time-frequency searchesCoherent WaveBurst (2)

S. Klimenko et al., arXiv:1511.05999

H1

L1

V1

data mixing signal noise

mixing(beampattern)

● Network of detectors● They all receive the same gravitational

wave h+ and hx

● Seek phase-coherent signals ● Likelihood → Inverse problem

● Mixing: beampattern, propagation delays● Similar to beamforming (radar, radioastro)

● Compensate time delays → Can be done efficiently in the time-frequency plane using Wilson transforms (orthonormal basis)

● Source localization and waveform reconstruction using “bright” pixels● Small scales, high-frequency pixels are important!

Page 29: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Gravitational wave polarizations

● Polarization reconstruction– Bivariate signal h+ and hx

● Polarized AM-FM signal– Can be characterized by Stokes params

(through quaternionic embedding) See posters by F Feng & P Chainais

Precession of the orbital plane!

Page 30: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

LIGO and Virgo observations so far...

Page 31: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Sep 14, 2015

7 ms

Page 32: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Sep 14, 2015

Page 33: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”
Page 34: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

GWTC#1● 10 binary black hole mergers

including Virgo

arXiv:1811.12907, https://www.gw-openscience.org/catalogs/

● population hidden to conventional astronomy

Page 35: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Aug 17, 2017

Page 36: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

https://www.gw-openscience.orgLecture videos, Jupyter notebooks, challenge data set available online – Run on Google Colab cloud

https://indico.in2p3.fr/2/gw-odw2

Page 37: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

LIGO at ~120 Mpc (L1) and 100 Mpc (H1)Virgo at ~50 Mpc (x ~2 wrt O2) ~90 % duty cycleVery promising start! 14 alerts

https://gracedb.ligo.org/latest/

~ 1 alert/week

Science run O3

Page 38: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

May 2019 April 2019

BBH: binary black holeBNS: binary neutron starNSBH: neutron star black hole binary

Last BBH on Jun 02 !

?

Science run O3 – current status

Page 39: “Sicut in caelo et in terra”

Prompt gravity signal from earthquakes

JP Montagner et al, Nature Comm. 7, 13349 (2016)

2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

M. Vallée et al, Science, 358, 6367, pp. 1164-1168 (2017)Gravity signals could speedily warn of big quakes and save lives [doi:10.1038/nature.2017.23045]