Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

18
1 RUTTING CORRUGATION MODELING WITH SIMPACK C. Collette (1), H. Chollet (2), R. Bastaits (1), A. Preumont (1) (1) Department of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, University of Brussels, BELGIUM (2) Laboratoire des Technologies Nouvelles (LTN), Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité, 2 av. Général Malleret-Joinville 94114 Arcueil FRANCE Research Supported by European Commission (5th Growth Program) « Wheel-Rail Corrugation in Urban Transport »

Transcript of Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

Page 1: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

1

RUTTING CORRUGATION MODELING WITH SIMPACK

C. Collette (1), H. Chollet (2), R. Bastaits (1), A. Preumont (1)(1) Department of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, University of Brussels,

BELGIUM(2) Laboratoire des Technologies Nouvelles (LTN), Institut National de Recherche sur les

Transports et leur Sécurité, 2 av. Général Malleret-Joinville 94114 Arcueil FRANCE

Research Supported by European Commission (5th Growth Program) « Wheel-Rail Corrugation in Urban Transport »

Page 2: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

2

Contents

1. Rail Corrugation

2. The approach

3. Test Case (STIB Track Section)

4. Multi-body Model Corrugation mitigation

5. ¼ Scaled test bench

6. Conclusions & Future works

Page 3: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

3

1. Rail Corrugation

Fixing mechanism:

Resonance mode of vehicle/track system

+ same vehicles at same speed…

1st and 2nd torsional resonances of

the wheel-set

Damage Mechanism:

Plastic flow, wear, fatigue…

Wear of trough (long. Oscillations)

Page 4: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

4

Basic mechanism

A. Matsumoto Wear 253 (2002) 178-184

Rutting Corrugation

Frictional power densitydissipated in the contact patch

Page 5: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

5

2. The approach

Measurements Modeling + solutions

Scale 1:1

Validation

Scale1:4

Page 6: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

6

3. Test Case: STIB Track Section

L = 3.5 cm f = 450 Hz

L = 6 cm f = 300 Hz

L = 10 cm f = 150 Hz

L = 20 cm f = 75 Hz

L = v / f :

Mean Vehicle Speed = 16 m/s

Track Length : 710 m

Curve Radius : 175 m

L = 6 cm

Page 7: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

7

4. Multi-body model: vehicle parameters

Page 8: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

8

Multi-body model: track parameters

Page 9: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

9

Short time Fourier tranform (STFT)

2nd torsional mode

2nd bending mode1st torsional mode

Track modes

Page 10: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

10

Rutting corrugation mitigation

Dynamic Vibration absorber :

frequency ratio

optimal damping

Page 11: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

11

Rough Design (Torsion Only)

Characteristics:• Rint = 8.5 cm• Rext = 15 cm• Length = 10 cm• J = 0.5787 Kg.m2

• kT = 2.1956 106 Nm/rad• cT = 300 Nms/rad

Page 12: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

12

Full scale numerical efficiency

PSD Averaged in time (Delta - Beaulieu)

15 % mitigation15 % mitigation

Page 13: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

13

5. ¼ Scaled test bech from LTN (INRETS)

Vertical force

Verticalexcitation

Lateral forceGenerator

Rotational vibrometer Motor

Page 14: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

14

Friction law

Measurement : Simpack model : Polach approximation

Friction coefficient decreases with

important sliding velocities between the wheel and the

rail.

Page 15: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

15

Rutting corrugation: modeling

Experiment :

1. w_roller = 48.6 rad/s

2. Vertical excitation :

- Amplitude : 20 N

- Frequency : 270 Hz ( = 1st torsional mode of the wheel set)

3. T_wheelset : 3.45 Nm

4. T_roller : 5.6 Nm

Page 16: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

16

Rutting corrugation: modeling

Roll-slip phenomenon

Page 17: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

17

Rutting corrugation: measurements

Experiment : same conditions

Roll-slip phenomenon

Filtering

Page 18: Rutting Corrugation Modeling with SIMPACK

18

6. Conclusions & Future work

Conclusions :• Complete multi-body model of the vehicle/track system• Validation with a test case (STIB metro network) :• With DVA: 15 % less energy dissipated in the contact patch.

Future work :• Parameter variation study on the scaled test bench.• Validation of the dynamic vibration absorber on the scaled test bench.