Patrick Haggard Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience ... · Patrick Haggard Institute of Cognitive...
Transcript of Patrick Haggard Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience ... · Patrick Haggard Institute of Cognitive...
Patrick Haggard
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroscience and conscious free will
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience
University College London
Collaborators: James Moore, Marcel Brass, Diane Ruge, Dorit Wenke, John Rothwell, Eamonn Walsh, Dick Passingham, Hakwan Lau,
Valerian Chambon, Angela Sirigu, Simone Kuehn, Wolfgang Prinz
Funding: Leverhulme Trust, ESRC, ESF, COST, Fyssen Foundation
Neuroscience and free will
1. Can the experience of conscious intention be studied scientifically?
2. What are its neural correlates?
3. What is its function?
4. Volition and sense of agency
Neuroscience and free will
1. Can the experience of conscious intention be studied scientifically?
2. What are its neural correlates?
3. What is its function?
4. Volition and sense of agency
6 05
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 53 0
3 5
4 0
4 5
5 0
5 5
Libet et al. (1983)
6 05
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 53 0
3 5
4 0
4 5
5 0
5 5
“23”
Libet et al. (1983)
“23”
Brain activity precedes conscious intention
• Readiness potential preceding voluntary action
-206 ms
• W judgement: awareness of intention
Vo
lta
ge
at C
z (
µV
)
Time (s)0Movement Onset
-1
-206 ms
??
|+
Conscious
Intention
Brain
Activity
Body
Movement
Cartesian view
DualismGhost in machine
Brain
Activity
Body
Movement
Neuroscience after Libet
Conscious
Intention
Implications?
• “Conscious free will” is an illusion
• My brain controls my actions• My brain controls my actions
• “I” know about my actions only very late
• Moral responsibility?
Libet experiment: problems
Methodological issues
• Task is difficult
• Instructions are bizarre
Conceptual issues
• Actions are arbitrary, have no value
• Social context is neglected
• “That’s not what we mean by free will!”
Neuroscience and free will
1. Can the experience of conscious intention be studied scientifically?
2. What are its neural correlates?
3. What is its function?
4. Volition and sense of agency
Brain circuits for intention(Lau, Rogers, Haggard, Passingham, Science 2004)
• Judge time of intention – judge time of action
1. Pre-SMA 2. Dorsal 3. 1. Pre-SMA 2. Dorsal
prefrontal
3.
IntraParietal
When did you experience making the action?
Sirigu, Haggard
Nature Neuroscience 2004
When did you experience willing the action?
When did you experience making the action?
Sirigu, Haggard
Nature Neuroscience 2004
When did you experience willing the action?
Functions of conscious intention
1. Control
Conscious intention controls our action
Cortical
stimulation
DualismGhost in machine
2. None (Daniel Dennett, Daniel Wegner)
Conscious intention is just an illusion stimulationConscious intention is just an illusion
Brain
Activity
Sensory
Feedback
Body
Movement
Conscious
Intention
“postdiction”
Neuroscience and free will
1. Can the experience of conscious intention be studied scientifically?
2. What are its neural correlates?
3. What is its function?
4. Volition and sense of agency
Conscious intention from
direct brain stimulation
• Fried et al. (1991): Neurosurgery for epilepsy
• Exploratory stimulation of • Exploratory stimulation of Supplementary Motor Area
• Anticipatory awareness:“I have an urge to move my right arm”
• Actual movement at higher current
Functions of conscious intention
Control
Conscious intention controls our action
Cortical
DualismGhost in machine
None Cortical
stimulation
None
Conscious intention is an illusion
Predictive learning
Conscious intention may enhance prediction and
monitoring of action outcomes
“Do you really want to be responsible for that?”
Brain mechanism for Intentional Inhibition of Action(Brass and Haggard, J Neurosci., 2007)
Instructions:
• “Prepare voluntary keypress actions…
• “On freely-chosen trials, cancel action at last moment”
• "Judge time of intention to move,whether you actually moved or not”
• Compare brain activity for action and inhibition
• Inhibition trials – Action trials aFMC
sig
nal s
tre
ng
th (
me
an
be
ta v
alu
e)
-0,01
0,00
0,01
0,02
Brain mechanism for Intentional Inhibition of Action(Brass and Haggard, J Neurosci., 2007)
• Anterior Fronto-Median Cortex (BA9)
sig
nal s
tre
ng
th (
me
an
be
ta v
alu
e)
-0,06
-0,05
-0,04
-0,03
-0,02
-0,01
veto act toneInhibit Act Tone control
• Expresses decision outcome “Stop: Don’t do it!”
• Anterior to intentional action areas (PreSMA)
Brain
Activity
Body
Movement
Conscious
IntentionExternal
Effect
prediction
Neural
“Veto”
• Conscious experience accompanies our actions • Conscious experience accompanies our actions and action decisions, but does not control them
• Consciousness may provide a marker of brain learning processes: “don’t do this again”
• So, the will can be educated
Actus Reus
+
Mens Rea
+
= Responsibility
Neuroscience and free will
1. Can the experience of conscious intention be studied scientifically?
2. What are its neural correlates?
3. What is its function?
4. Volition and sense of agency
Is responsibility a basic experience generated in the brain?
...or inference based on action-effect matching?
Intention
Effect
Movement
Time
Beep
Intentional BindingHaggard, Clark & Kalogeras, Nature Neuroscience, 2002
Beep
Awareness
of Beep
Time
Action Effect
(Beep)Shifted
Awareness
of Beep
Perceptual Shift
Intentional BindingHaggard, Clark & Kalogeras, Nature Neuroscience, 2002
Time
ActionAction
Awareness
of Action
Time
Action Effect
(Beep)Shifted
Awareness
of Action
Perceptual Shift
Intentional BindingHaggard, Clark & Kalogeras, Nature Neuroscience, 2002
Action Effect (beep)
250 ms Reality
+15 189 ms VoluntaryAction-46
Intentional BindingHaggard, Clark & Kalogeras, Nature Neuroscience, 2002
Action Effect (beep)
250 ms Reality
+15 189 ms Voluntary Acti-46
-27 308 ms
Involuntary TMS-induced twitch
+31
1. Stimulation of SMA reduces
sense of agency
Brain systems for conscious intention
also predict effects of actions
sense of agency
2. Basal Ganglia – preSMADopamine agonists
Binding Paradigm
• Voluntary finger movement
• 250 ms delay
• Shock to little finger
• Judge time of action or shock
• Transiently disrupt processing using repeated TMS
(cortical inhibition for approximately 30 minutes)
B. Baseline judgementsAction only
Shock only
250 msA. Physical events
Action Shock
E. Reconstruction hypothesis:
cTBS Sensorimotor hand area+32
C. Control condition: cTBS
Sensory Leg area+33
-107
-120
111
D. Prediction hypothesis:
cTBS preSMA+ 31 -86
**
• The brain generates an experience of responsibility
•... Using the same mechanisms that supply conscious intention
Fluent intention and prospective agency
• Matched for predictability: P(Effect/Action) is constant
• Compatible primes increase fluency of action selection
Sense of control
Fluency of action selection (e.g.,
through compatible priming) increases
sense of control over action effects:action effects:
Prospective, premotor sense of
agency
Neural correlates of prospective agency
1. Objective effect of fluent action selection: Compatible-incompatible primes
DLPFC
Left and Right
2. Subjective effect of reduced sense of control
rPPCrPPC
Angular Gyrus
3. Incompatible priming strengthens connectivity
DLPFC-AG
connectivity
Intention processing/
Action selectionIntention Monitoring/
Subjective sense of control
Angular gyrus: causal role in prospective agencyTMS evidence
+70ms +70ms
Prime Target JudgmentAction Effect
+70ms +70msContr
ol ra
tings
Target Effect
*`Early TMS
Abolishes priming effects
on sense of control:
AG role is necessary
for sense of agency
AG contribution is
PROSPECTIVE
Prime Target JudgmentAction Effect
So, do we have ‘conscious free will’?
• No, there is no ‘ghost in the machine’
• But the brain makes us conscious of what we are about to do
• Fronto-parietal network for action selection and monitoring makes sense of agency prospective as well as retrospective
• Our brain is a machine that can learn responsibility
• But society must give this mechanism opportunities to learn... No responsibility without equal opportunity
Thank you