Lec 8 Spectroscopy

download Lec 8 Spectroscopy

of 43

Transcript of Lec 8 Spectroscopy

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    1/43

    Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS)

    Dr. Nasir M Mirza

    Deputy Chief Scientist,

    Department of Physics & Applied mathematics,

    PIEAS, P.O. Nilore, 45650, Islamabad.

    Email: [email protected]

    Ph: +92 51 9290273 (ext: 3059)

    Lectures onRadiation Detection

    Delivered in Professional Training Course onRadiation Safety & RWM at PNRA (April, 2008)

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    2/43

    Gamma ray spectroscopy

    Recommended Text Books

    1. Glenn F Knoll sRadiation Detection & Measurement (recentedition).

    Lecture 8:

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    3/43

    Spectroscopy with Scintillators

    Spectroscopy:

    Measurement of (radiation ) energy

    Gamma-ray spectroscopy with solid portable mediumwas 1st time done with Na1(Tl) detector in 1950s

    Na1(tl) detector characteristics

    Extremely good light yield

    Excellent linearity

    High atomic number of iodine; high efficiency forcounting

    They have good energy resolution

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    4/43

    General Considerations in -Ray Spectroscopy

    Gamma rays interactions

    There in general no direct ionization

    Interact first with electrons of atoms

    Transfer full or partial energy in absorbing (Detector) Medium

    Gamma-rays generate fast electrons

    Electrons slow down and loose their energy

    This results in Excitation and Ionization of medium atoms

    A detector to serve as a gamma -ray spectrometer must carry out two

    distinct functions

    1st it must act as a conversion medium in which ray could interactand produce electrons

    2ndit must function as a detector for the electrons

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    5/43

    General Considerations in -Ray Spectroscopy (Contd.)

    Assume that detector is sufficiently large (of the

    order of centimeters) to avoid the escape of

    secondary electrons and bremsstrahlung;

    Low stopping power of gases and the requirementof full energy absorption for the secondary

    electrons generally rules out gas filled detectors

    for -Ray spectroscopy

    Remember at STP, the penetration distance of 1MeV

    electron is of the order of several meters

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    6/43

    Gamma Ray Interactions

    Significant ways of gamma-ray interaction are:

    Photoelectric absorption

    This process is dominant at low energy

    Compton Scattering

    Predominant for low energy

    Pair Production

    Probable for high energies (5-10 MeV)

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    7/43

    Photoelectric Absorption

    Photoelectric Effect

    The interaction in which ray photon disappearsand a photoelectron is produced with energy

    Energy utilizationElectrons kinetic energy;

    Recoil atomic energy is negligible;

    X-rays or Auger electron energy is alsoproduced (Auger electrons may escape or X-rays may reabsorb in the medium to cause PEinteraction with less tightly bound electron ofabsorber atom )

    Bremsstrahlung emission.

    beEhE

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    8/43

    Photoelectric Absorption (Contd.)

    Photoelectric effect is therefore an ideal process to measure the

    original (complete) energy of gamma ray.

    Detector Response

    If nothing escape from the detector than response of thedetector represents a single peak of gamma ray in the energy

    spectrum.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    9/43

    Compton Scattering

    Compton Scattering Process

    Gamma interaction results in

    a recoil electron and a

    scattering -ray photon

    Energy is divided b/w them

    depending on the scattering

    angle;

    )cos(cm

    hv

    hvvh

    o

    112

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    10/43

    Compton Scattering (Contd.)

    K.E. of recoil electron:

    Two extreme cases:

    2

    2

    (1 cos )

    1 (1 cos )

    o

    e

    o

    hv

    m cE h hv

    hv

    m c

    0 and 0e

    h h E

    2

    2 2

    2

    ( ) and ( )2 2

    1 1

    oe

    o o

    hv

    m chvhv E

    hv hv

    m c m c

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    11/43

    Compton Scattering (Contd.)

    All scattering angles are possible in a detector so a continuum

    of energies can be transferred to electrons from 0 to maximumat =

    The gap energy is given by:

    2

    2

    2

    ( )2

    1

    2

    0.256 MeV2

    c e

    o

    o

    o

    c

    hvE h E

    hv

    m c

    h m c

    m cE

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    12/43

    Compton Scattering (Contd.)

    For anyone specific gamma-ray energy, the electron energy

    distribution has the general shape shown in the sketch below.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    13/43

    Pair Production

    In this process, incident photon is completely disappeared,

    create an electron-positron pair

    Energy of electron positron pair:

    A problem

    Positron slow down after depositing its energy andannihilate to give two photons of 0.511 MeV each

    These annihilation radiation appears in virtual coincidencewith the original pair production interaction (as time to slowdown and annihilate for a positron is very small)

    22 cmhEE

    oee

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    14/43

    Pair Production (Contd.)

    A plot of the total (electron + positron) charged particle kinetic

    energy created by the incident gamma ray is again a simple deltafunction, but it is now located 2moc

    2below the incident gamma-ray

    energy, as illustrated in the sketch below.

    In our simple model, this amount of energy will be deposited each time

    a pair production interaction occurs within the detector.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    15/43

    Predicted Response Functions

    Depends upon the size of the detector so we broadly

    classify it into three classes

    Small Detector

    Large Detector

    Intermediate Detector

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    16/43

    Predicted Response Function for Small Detectors

    Small detector means size of detector is small as

    compared with the mean free path of the secondaryradiations produced in interaction of the original gammarays

    Secondary radiations mean Compton scattered gamma

    rays and annihilation photons

    Mean Free Path of secondary rays is typically of theorder of several centimeters, so small detector meansthat the detector dimensions are less than 1 or 2 cm

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    17/43

    Predicted Response Function for Small Detectors (Contd.)

    Now there can be two possibilities:

    E < 1.02 MeV

    E > 1.02 MeV

    CASE 1: E < 1.02 MeV

    For energy, E below the value at which pair production issignificant.

    Spectrum contains Compton scattering and photoelectric

    absorption

    The ratio of area under photo peak to the area under Comptoncontinuum is the same as the ratio of the photoelectric crosssection to the Compton cross section in the detector material

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    18/43

    Predicted Response Function for Small Detectors (Contd.)

    Figure 10.2 The "small detector" extreme in gamma-ray spectroscopy.

    The processes of photoelectric absorption and single Compton scattering

    give rise to the low-energy spectrum at the left when E < 1.02 MeV.

    MeV1.02: E

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    19/43

    Predicted Response Function for Small Detectors (Contd.)

    CASE 2: E > 1.02MeV

    For small detectors, only the electron and positron kinetic

    energies deposited

    Annihilation radiation escapes

    Result of annihilation radiation escape is double escape peak

    located at an energy 1.02 MeV below the photo peak

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    20/43

    Predicted Response Function for Small Detectors (Contd.)

    Figure 10.2 The "small detector" extreme in gamma-ray spectroscopy.

    The processes of photoelectric absorption and single Compton scattering give rise

    to the low-energy spectrum at the left. At higher energies, the pair production

    process adds a double escape peak shown in the spectrum at the right.

    CASE 2: E > 1.02MeV

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    21/43

    Large Detectors

    Detector dimensions are sufficiently large so that all secondary

    radiation also interact within the detector;

    none escapes from the surface; all energy is deposited within the

    detector;

    For typical gamma rays energies, to fulfill the requirement of

    depositing all the energy in the detector requires detector

    dimensions to be of the order oftens of centimeters (unrealistically

    large for practical cases)

    Predicted Response Funct ion

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    22/43

    Response Function for Very Large Detectors (Contd.)

    The detector response is the same as

    if the original gamma-ray photon hadundergone a simple photoelectric

    absorption in a single step.

    The name Full energy peak is used here

    for photo-peak as it covers the

    contributions of all other events as well.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    23/43

    Predicted Response Function for Large Detectors (Contd.)

    The detector response is the same as if the original gamma

    ray photon had undergone a simple photo electric absorption

    in a single step

    The assumption of single step is being used at the time

    involved in the whole process of depositing total energy is

    very small as compared to inherent response time of

    virtually all practical detectors used in gamma ray

    spectroscopy;

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    24/43

    Intermediate Size Detectors

    Predicted Response Function

    Real detectors of the sizes in common use for gamma ray

    spectroscopy are neither small nor large by the standards

    discussed before

    So the response of real detectors will be mixture of features

    discussed in two previous cases plus some additional

    features

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    25/43

    Predicted Response Function for Intermediate Size Detectors (Contd.)

    For the case of E

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    26/43

    Predicted Response Function for Intermediate Size Detectors (Contd.)

    E >> 2moc2

    In addition to things discussed for E

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    27/43

    Predicted Response Function for Intermediate Size Detectors (Contd.)

    Figure 10.4 The case of intermediate detector size in gamma-ray spectroscopy. In

    addition to the continuum from single Compton scattering and the full-energy

    peak, the spectrum at the left shows the influence of multiple Compton events

    followed by photon escape. The full-energy peak also contains some histories that

    began with Compton scattering.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    28/43

    Predicted Response Function for Intermediate Size Detectors (Contd.)

    Figure 10.4 The case of intermediate detector size in gamma-ray spectroscopy. At the

    right, the single escape peak corresponds to initial pair production interactions in which

    only one annihilation photon leaves the detector without further interaction. A double

    escape peak as illustrated in Fig. 10.2 will also be present due to those pair production

    events in which both annihilation photons escape.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    29/43

    Complications in Response Functions

    Secondary Electron Escape

    Bremsstrahlung Escape

    Characteristic X-ray Escape

    Secondary Radiations Created Near the Source

    Effect of Surrounding Material

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    30/43

    Secondary Electron Escape

    Secondary electrons (electrons from PE, CS, PP)

    may escape the detector without full deposition ofenergy

    Response function is distorted by

    Moving events to lower amplitude

    Height of Compton continuum is reduced

    Photo-fraction will be reduced

    The ratio of the area under photo-peak (or full energypeak) to that under the entire response function is calledphoto-fraction

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    31/43

    Bremsstrahlung Escape

    Slowing of secondary electron, production of

    bremsstrahlung

    Process is dominant for high -ray energies and high

    Zmaterials

    Electron producing bremsstrahlung may stop in medium butsome of bremsstrahlung may escape

    The escape of bremsstrahlung leads to

    Change in shape of response function but additional peaks orsharp features are not introduced

    Similar as secondary electron escape

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    32/43

    Characteristic X-Ray Escape

    Characteristic X-ray Escape

    Photoelectric absorption

    Vacancy in atom shell

    Characteristics x-ray

    Photoelectric effect near detector boundary Characteristic X-Ray may escape

    Energy deposited = h - Ex

    X-Ray Escape peaks most prominent at

    At low incident -ray energies

    For detectors whose S/V ratio is large

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    33/43

    Secondary Radiations Created Near the Source

    Major contributors to secondary radiations created near the

    source are

    Annihilation Radiation

    Bremsstrahlung

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    34/43

    Secondary Radiations Created Near the Source (Contd.)

    Annihilation radiation

    Source consists of isotope emitting positron

    Annihilation peak observed at 0.511 MeV energy

    superimposed an the -ray spectrum

    For detector geometries in which it is possible to detect bothannihilation photons from a single decay simultaneously

    (Example: Well Counter), then a peak at 1.022 MeV may

    also be observed in the recorded spectrum

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    35/43

    Secondary Radiations Created Near the Source (Contd.)

    Bremsstrahlung

    Produced from -emitting sources

    Some external absorber used to stop beta particles to reachdetector

    Bremsstrahlung produced in such absorbers can complicate the

    spectrum

    No peaks are formed as bremsstrahlung in continuous form butcant be subtracted simply as back ground so errors inquantitative measurement

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    36/43

    Effects of Surrounding Material

    Various materials surrounding detector give rise to the secondary

    radiations Detector Encapsulation (a barrier against moisture and light)

    Detector Shield (for reduction of natural background)

    Source Encapsulation

    Secondary radiation

    Back scattered gamma rays

    X-rays

    Photoelectric Absorption in Material

    Require Graded Shield

    Annihilation peak

    Pair Production in Materials

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    37/43

    Effects of Surrounding Material (Contd.)

    Figure 10.6 Influence of surrounding

    materials on detector response. In additionto the expected spectrum (shown as a

    dashed line), the representative histories

    shown at the top lead to the indicated

    corresponding features in the response

    function.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    38/43

    Spectrum from a 86Rb Source

    Figure lO.U Pulse

    height spectrarecorded from

    NaI(TI) scintillation

    detectors. (a) A

    spectrum for a 86Rb

    source (1.08 MeV

    gamma rays)showing the

    contribution at the

    lower end of the

    scale from

    bremsstrahlung

    generated in

    stopping the beta

    particles emitted by

    the source.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    39/43

    Spectrum from a 60Co Source

    (b) Spectrumfrom a 60Cosource (1.17and 1.33 MeVgamma raysemitted incoincidence)

    taken underconditions inwhich the solidangle subtendedby the detectoris relatively

    large. enhancingthe intensity ofthe sum peak at2.50 MeV.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    40/43

    Spectrum from a 24Na Source

    Figure 10.13 Pulse height spectrum from a NaI(Tl) scintillator for gamma raysemitted by 24Na at 1369 and 2754 keV. The single and double escape peakscorresponding to pair production interactions of the higher energy gamma raysare very apparent, as is the annihilation radiation peak at 511 keV due to pairproduction interactions in surrounding materials.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    41/43

    Resolution of NaI(tl) based System

    In many practical cases, the

    statistical broadening of thepeak predominates over otherpotential sources of resolutionloss.

    In that event, the variation ofthe resolution with gamma-rayenergy can be predicted simplyby noting that the FWHM of thepeak is proportional to thesquare root of the gamma-rayphoton energy.

    The average pulse heightproduced is directly proportionalto the gamma-ray energy.Therefore, from the definition ofenergy resolution:

    Therefore, a plot of InR versus E

    should be a straight line with slope

    of .

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    42/43

    Resolution

    Figure 10.17

    Experimentally measured

    resolutionR from a

    NaI(Tl) scintillation

    detector for various

    gamma-ray energiesE.

  • 7/28/2019 Lec 8 Spectroscopy

    43/43

    Peak Efficiency of Detector

    Figure: Intrinsic

    peak efficiencies

    for BGO and

    NaI(Tl)

    scintillators of

    equal 38 x 38 mm

    size. Radioisotope

    sources used for

    various photon

    energies are

    indicated.