KI1101-2012-KD Lec05b ChemicalBondingAndMolecularStructure
-
Upload
achmad-rochliadi -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
1
description
Transcript of KI1101-2012-KD Lec05b ChemicalBondingAndMolecularStructure
Ch. 9 Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure
Brady & Senese, 5th Ed
Personal Use Only
Index
9.1. Molecules are three-dimensional with shapes that are built from five basic arrangements9.2. Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model9.3. Molecular symmetry affects the polarity of molecules9.4. Valence bond theory explains bondi
ng as an overlap of orbitals9.5. Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries9.6. Hybrid orbitals can be used to explain multiple bonds9.7. Molecular orbital theory explains bon
ding as constructive interference of atomic orbitals9.8. Molecular orbital theory uses delocalized orbitals to describe molecules with resonance structure
Personal Use Only
9.1 Molecules are three-dimensional with shapes that are built from five basic arrangements
3
The Five Basic Electron Arrangements
Electron Domains
Shape Electron Pair Geometry
2 linear
3 trigonal planar
4 tetrahedral
Personal Use Only
9.1 Molecules are three-dimensional with shapes that are built from five basic arrangements
4
The Five Basic Electron Arrangements (Cont.)
Electron Domains Shape Electron Pair Geometry
5 trigonal bipyramidal
has equatorial and axial positions.
6 octahedral
has equatorial and axial positions
Personal Use Only
9.1 Molecules are three-dimensional with shapes that are built from five basic arrangements
5
Learning Check:
Identify The Electron Pair Geometry For Each Center
tetrahedral tetrahedral Trigonal bipyramidal
Personal Use Only
9.1 Molecules are three-dimensional with shapes that are built from five basic arrangements
6
Your Turn!
What is the electron pair geometry for C in CO2?
A. linear
B. planar triangular
C. tetrahedral
D. trigonal bipyramidal
E. octahedral
Personal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 7
Bonding Domains And Non-bonding Domains
• Bonding domains are shared between nuclei
• Non-bonding domains are not shared between nuclei-they exert a greater electrical field
• Repulsion leads non-bonding domains to occupy larger space
• The basic shapes are distorted by non-bonding domains to create the molecular geometry
Personal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 8
Trigonal Planar Molecular Geometries
Bonding Domains Non-bonding Domains
Molecular Geometry
3 0 trigonal planar
2 1 bent
Personal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 9
Tetrahedral Molecular geometries
Personal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 10
Trigonal Bipyramidal
• Equatorial (e) positions are substituted first
• This is because the e,e bond angles are 120°, while a,e bond angles are only 90°
Personal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 11
Octahedral Geometries
• All bond angles are 90°
• Axial positions are substituted firstPersonal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 12
Learning Check:
Identify the molecular geometry for each center
Trigonal pyramidal
Non-linear, bent
Linear
Personal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 13
Your Turn!
Which require more space?
A. bond pairs
B. lone pairs
C. both are the samePersonal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 14
Your Turn!
Which bond angles are closer in a trigonal bipyramidal structure (a= axial; e=equatorial)?
A. a-a
B. a-e
C. e-e
D. they are all the samePersonal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 15
Your Turn!
Which bond angles are closer in a trigonal bipyramidal structure (a= axial; e=equatorial)?
A. a-a
B. a-e
C. e-e
D. they are all the samePersonal Use Only
9.2 Molecular shapes are predicted using the VSEPR model 16
Your Turn!
What is the molecular geometry of C in CH4?
A. Linear
B. Square planar
C. Square pyramidal
D. Tetrahedral
E. None of these
Personal Use Only
9.3 Molecular symmetry affects the polarity of molecules 17
Polar Molecules Are Asymmetric
• To determine the polarity, draw the structure using the proper molecular geometry
• Draw the bond dipoles• If they cancel, the molecule is non-polar• If the molecule has uneven dipole distribution, it is
polarPersonal Use Only
9.3 Molecular symmetry affects the polarity of molecules 18
Learning Check:
Polar or non-polar?
polar Non-polarpolar
Personal Use Only
9.3 Molecular symmetry affects the polarity of molecules 19
Your Turn!
CH2ClCH2Cl (freon-150) is likely to be:
A. Polar
B. non-polar
C. cannot tellPersonal Use Only
9.3 Molecular symmetry affects the polarity of molecules 20
Your Turn!
Benzoyl peroxide (used in common acne medications) is likely to be:
A. polar
B. non-polar
C. cannot tellPersonal Use Only
9.4 Valence bond theory explains bonding as an overlap of atomic orbitals 21
Valence Bond Theory
• H2 bonds form because atomic valence orbitals overlap
• HF involves overlaps between the s orbital on H and the 2p orbital of F
1s 1s
1s 2s 2p
Personal Use Only
9.4 Valence bond theory explains bonding as an overlap of atomic orbitals 22
VB Theory And H2S
• Assume that the unpaired e- in S and H are free to form a paired bond
• We may assume that the H-S bond forms between an s and a p orbital
Personal Use Only
9.4 Valence bond theory explains bonding as an overlap of atomic orbitals 23
Your turn!
According to VB Theory:
Which type of overlap does not occur in BH3?
A. s-s
B. s-p
C. p-p
D. none of these
Personal Use Only
9.4 Valence bond theory explains bonding as an overlap of atomic orbitals 24
Your turn!
According to VB Theory:
Which orbitals overlap in the formation of NH3?
A. s-s
B. s-p
C. p-p
D. none of these
Personal Use Only
9.4 Valence bond theory explains bonding as an overlap of atomic orbitals 25
Difficulties With VB Theory So Far:
• Most experimental bond angles do not support those predicted by mere atomic orbital overlap
• For example: C 1s22s22p2 and H 1s1
• Experimental bond angles in methane are 109.5° and all are the same
• p orbitals are 90° apart, and not all valence e- in C are in the p orbitals
• How can multiple bonds form?
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 26
Hybridization
• The mixing of atomic orbitals to allow formation of bonds that have realistic bond angles
• The new shapes that result are called “hybrid orbitals”
• The number of hybrid orbitals required = the number of bonding domains + the number of non-bonding domains on the atom
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 27
What Shall We Call These New Orbitals?
• Since we have annexed the spaces previously defined by atomic orbitals, we name the hybrid as a combination of the orbitals used to form the new hybrid
• One atomic orbital is used for every hybrid formed (orbitals are conserved)Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 28
Hybrids From s & p Atomic Orbitals take VSEPR Geometry
Hybrid Atomic Orbitals Used
Electron Geometry
sp3 s + px + py + pz
Tetrahedral, bond angles 109.5˚
sp2 s + px + py Trigonal planar, bond angles 120 ˚
sp s + px Linear,bond angles 180 ˚
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 29
Learning Check:
Identify The Hybrid Orbitals In The Following, Based On Their VSEPR Geometry
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 30
Determining hybridization:
1. expand all valence electrons within the valence energy level. For C, for example this means:
• 2s↑↓ 2p ↑ _ ↑ ___ [He]2s2 2p1
• Becomes:
• 2s↑ 2p ↑ _ ↑ _ ↑ __Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 31
Hybridization
• 2. Now analyze the bonding and lone pair needs. You will need to use one hybrid orbital for every bonding domain and one for every non-bonding domain.
• For C in CH4 we see that there are 4 attached atoms and no lone pairs on C. Thus we will need 4 hybrid orbitals.
H
HH
H
C
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 32
Hybridization (sp3)
• 3. Now analyze the atomic orbital needs. You will need to use one atomic orbital for every hybrid orbital .
• For C in CH4 we will need 4 hybrid orbitals.
• 2s↑ 2p ↑ _ ↑ ↑_
• Thus, we will need to use all valence level atomic orbitals available to us.
• (2s↑ 2p ↑ _ ↑ _ ↑)
• S + p + p + p → 4 new equivalent “sp3” orbitals.
H
HH
H
C
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 33
Bonding in CH4
• The 4 hybrid orbitals are evenly distributed around the C
• The H s-orbitals overlap the sp3 hybrid orbitals to form the bonds.
H
HH
H
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 34
s & p hybrid shapes
Personal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 35
Your Turn!
In the compound CH3OH, what is the expected hybridization on O?
A. sp
B. sp2
C. sp3
D. O does not hybridizePersonal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 36
Expanded Octet Hybridization
• Can be predicted from the geometry as well
• In these situations, d orbitals are be needed to provide room for the extra electrons
• One d orbital is added for each pair of electrons in excess of the standard octetPersonal Use Only
9.5 Hybrid orbitals are used to explain experimental molecular geometries 37
Expanded Octet hybridization
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 38
Bonding Types
• Two types of bonds result from orbital overlap:
• sigma bonds from head-on overlap
lie along the bond axis
account for the first bond
• pi bonds from lateral overlap by adjacent p or
d orbitals
pi bonds are perpendicular to bond axis
account for the second and third bonds in a multiple bond
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 39
Hybridization of C in CH2O O
H HC
1. Expand all valence electrons within the same energy level. For C, for example this means:
• 2s↑↓ 2p ↑ _ ↑ ___ [He]2s2 2p1
• Becomes:
• 2s↑ 2p ↑ _ ↑ _ ↑ __Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 40
Hybridization of C in CH2O O
H HC
• 2. Now analyze the bonding and lone pair needs. You will need to use one hybrid orbital for every attached atom and one for every lone pair. For C in CH2O we see that there are 3 attached atoms
and no lone pairs on C. Thus we will need 3 hybrid orbitals.
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 41
sp2 Hybridization
• 3. Now analyze the atomic orbital needs. You will need to use one atomic orbital for every hybrid orbital. For C in CH2O we will need 3 hybrid orbitals.
2s↑ 2p ↑ _ ↑ ↑_ Thus, we will need to use 3 valence level atomic
orbitals available to us, and one of the p orbitals will remain.
(2s↑ 2p ↑ _ ↑ ) _ ↑ s + p + p → 3 new “sp2” orbitals. We are left with one unhybridized orbital.
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 42
Now analyze the O:
• [He] 2s2 2p2 (2s↑↓ 2p ↑ ↓_ ↑ ) _ ↑
• The O is has one bonding domain and 2 non-bonding domains, hence it will require three hybrid orbitals.
• No expansion needed, as one unpaired e- is available to bond. Use 3 atomic orbitals to make the new hybrids, sp2. (2s↑↓ 2p ↑ ↓_ ↑ ) _ ↑
• Again we are left with one unhybridized p orbital
O
H HC
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 43
Pi Bonding
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 44
H−C≡C −H
• Each C has a triple bond and a single bond
• Requires 2 hybrid orbitals, sp
• unhybridized p orbitals used to form the pi bond
Personal Use Only
9.6 Hybrid orbitals can be used to describe multiple bonds 45
Your Turn!
Consider a molecule of CH3CO2H:
How many pi bonds are there in the molecule?
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. There are none
Personal Use Only
9.7 Molecular orbital theory explains bonding as constructive interference of atomic orbitals
46
Molecular Orbital Theory
• Modification of VB theory that considers that the orbitals may exhibit interference.
• Waves may interfere constructively or destructively
• Bonding orbitals stabilize, antibonding destabilize.
Personal Use Only
9.7 Molecular orbital theory explains bonding as constructive interference of atomic orbitals
47
MO diagrams
• Show atomic energy level diagram for each atom
• Show molecular orbitals (bonding and antibonding*)
• 1 MO for each Atomic orbital.
• Show electron occupancy of the orbitals.Personal Use Only
9.7 Molecular orbital theory explains bonding as constructive interference of atomic orbitals
48
Filling MO diagrams
1. Electrons fill the lowest-energy orbitals that are available.
2. No more than two electrons, with spins paired, can occupy any orbital.
3. Electrons spread out as much as possible, with spins unpaired, over orbitals that have the same energy.
4. Bond order = e- in bonding orbital-e- in nonbonding orbitals.
Personal Use Only
9.7 Molecular orbital theory explains bonding as constructive interference of atomic orbitals
49
Diatomic MO diagrams differ by group
• A) I - V B) VI-VIIIA
Personal Use Only
9.7 Molecular orbital theory explains bonding as constructive interference of atomic orbitals
50
MO diagrams
Draw the expected MO diagram for:• O2
• BH
• He2
Which are not likely to exist, and why?
Personal Use Only
9.8 Molecular orbital theory uses delocalized orbitals to describe molecules with resonance structures
51
Delocalized Electrons
• Lewis structures use resonance to explain that the actual molecule appears to have several equivalent bonds, rather than different possible structures
• MO theory shows the electrons being delocalized in the structurePersonal Use Only
9.8 Molecular orbital theory uses delocalized orbitals to describe molecules with resonance structures
52
CO32- Hybridization
• Carbonate has three equivalent resonance structures. What are they, and which electrons are delocalized?
• Draw the hybrid molecule to indicate the delocalization of these electrons.
Personal Use Only