Hôtel Château Laurier

17

description

NACREW. Québec 2013. Hôtel Château Laurier. August 25-28, 2013 / 25 au 28 août 2013. Impact of vertical variability of soil hydraulic properties on drainage efficiency in cranberry production Yann Périard, M. Sc . Silvio Gumiere, ing ., Ph . D . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Hôtel Château Laurier

Page 1: Hôtel  Château  Laurier
Page 2: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Hôtel Château LaurierAugust 25-28, 2013 / 25 au 28 août 2013

NACREWQuébec 2013

Page 3: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Impact of vertical variability of soil hydraulic properties on

drainage efficiency in cranberry production

Yann Périard, M. Sc.Silvio Gumiere, ing., Ph. D.

Alain N. Rousseau, ing., Ph. D.Jean Caron, agr., Ph. D.

Page 4: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Introduction

Need an optimal water management

Perched water table

Heterogeneity of soil profile Restrictive

hydraulic properties in a layer

Kummer 2004

Simulation of perched water table

Pressure head

Page 5: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Diagnosis of perched water table

Calculated with Tx3 (Hortau)

Measured with Water Level Logger

Soil Water Potential=Water Table Depth ? Formation of a

restrictive layer

Page 6: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Numerical simulation of perched water table

Simulation with finite element model Hydrus 2D/3D

Good prediction

Now we can do a numerical study 40 000

simulations

Page 7: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Methodology(Directional Sensitivity Analysis)

Page 8: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Boundary conditions

168 hours of simulation 1D domain with 100 cm 100 elements (101 nodes)

Conditions Hydraulic (p1..p625)

(n, α, Ks, θs ) 2 soil types

Physical 4 depths 4 thicknesses

Meteorological 4 rainfalls

Seepage face

Atmospheric conditions

hK K Ex

2

1

1

1 1

1

mnre

s r

ml m

e s e e

S h

K S K S S

nmn

(Mualem (1976) and van Genuchten’s model (1980)

Page 9: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Sensitivity analysis scheme

Model HYDRUS 1D

Output files

Numerical traitementSENSAN

Configuration Hydraulic parameters (n, α, Ks, θs )

Rain Depth Thicknessp1 20 10 5p2 40 20 10p3 60 40 20..p625 80 60 40

Parameter file

Model input file

Results

Page 10: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Sensitivity calculations

0 0, , , ,, ,

R D T R D TR D T

p p pS

0

00

0p

p pS p p

p p p

First-order sensitivity index

Gâteaux directional derivative (Gâteaux, R, (1910))

Gâteaux, R

Page 11: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Results

Page 12: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Matric potential at 48 h after the higher level of water table

Conditions 10 cm of depth 10 cm of thickness 40 mm of rain

With n and α high Drainage norm is not

respected matric potential

(cm)

Comfort Zone

Dry

Wet-30 cm

-70 cm

Page 13: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Matric potential at 48 h after the higher level of water table

n and α Control the curve

shape At − 30 cm of matric

potential Drainage rate, 3

orders less in the restrictive soil layer

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

0 30 60 90 120

|h| [cm]

M1 M2

Hydraulic Properties: log K vs. h

Page 14: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

First-order sensitivity index

(p1..p25) (n, α, Ks, θs )

n and α high effect on

matric potential at 48 h

Sensitive hydraulic parameters

Page 15: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Conclusions

Perched water table Diagnosis Measurement &

calculation

Numerical study Identified conditions

causing perched water table

n and α high effect on

drainage efficiency

Page 16: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Canneberges BielerNature Canneberge

Transport Gaston NadeauSalzwedel Cranberry

Ferme Onésime Pouliot

Thank you!

Questions ?

Page 17: Hôtel  Château  Laurier

Thank

you ! Special thanks to our sponsors

Un merci spécial à nos commanditaires