Туининг Проект BG O7 IB EN 01 Укрепване на административния...

Туининг Проект BG O7 IB EN 01Укрепване на административния капацитет на органите за управлението на водите в България за прилагане на икономическите инструменти за управлението на водите съгласно РДВ 2000/60/EC

Coopération Européenne France - Bulgarie pour la Directive Cadre sur l’Eau

Reporting

Hervé GilliardAgence de l’eau Loire-Bretagne

February 2010



A national coordination

Water and biodiversity direction(Ministry of environment)

Water and aquatic ecosystem national office

(in french “Onema”)

Reporting responsability

Technical support

Basin 1Basin 1

Basin 2Basin 2 Basin 3Basin 3

Basin 4Basin 4

Basin 6Basin 6 Basin 5Basin 5

Data collectionDatabase production

Database transmission to national level

Nat

ion

alB

asin



A national coordination

What are the key points of national coordination :

Reporting national group :

o Questions to ask to european commissions

o Communication about technical issues, about comprehension difficulty

o …

A national guidance which comment the way to understand the european document «A user guide to the streamlined schemas for reporting on articles 3, 5, and 13 of the WFD »

An internet blog opened to basin reporting responsibles questions

Unformal communication between basins



Loire britanny basin coordination

One focal pointIn charge of reporting basin

coordination

Thematic database (sources)

Excel form

Access form

Word form

• Several meetings with experts related to reporting schemes (RBMP, RW, TW, LW, CW, GW, PA)• Identification of relevant sources• Checking board of reporting implementation (for each item and each scheme)• Some validation phasis

GIS service

Specific data treatment, as for instance :

- spatial connection between PA and WB, between significant pressures and WB,…

- spatial data reporting preparation

With the support of



Loire britanny basin organisation

WFD reporting data

SWB GWB ProtArea SW Methods GW Methods RDSUCA RBMP_POM

ReportNet Validation Tool



Loire britanny basin organisation


2. Instances about key points, difficulties and solutions for scheme :

1. General comments about main difficulties and key points

Information : In France, monitoring program will be reported in june 2010 to WISE



Loire britanny basin :

General comments on reporting works

1. General comments about main difficulties and key points Method schemes completed by national level (SW and GW), important to benefit

from economy of scale

Necessity to have well formed data basis, in order to limit data treatment and re-coding works

A lot of time spent on PA datas (errors correction, work undone…), due to too much participants

Necessity to be cautious to treat scheme together, between scheme (for instance between PA, SW and GW; for instance between RBMP, SW and GW for pressure elements) and between table in a scheme (for instance reason of chemical exemptions and reason of actual chemical bad status)

Some obligatory tables or items difficult or impossible to complete (for instance trend reversal in BW scheme)

Some modification directly done on xml in order to succeed in validation (instances in next slides)




Instances about key points, difficulties and solutions for scheme


Items «ValueStatusProtectedArea » and «CommentValueStatusProtArea » are obligatory if the type of protected area is « Article 7 Abstraction for drinking water » (table « SWB_ProtectedArea_Status » and « GWB_ProtectedArea_Status » )

Table « « GWB_TrendReversal* » is obligatory : we filled « N » in « TrendReversal* » item even if this answer is wrong and a comment to explain in « TrendReversalComment »

Main pressures identify on water body «at risk », and / or, in current bad status (for one or several QE), and / or where there are effluents or abstraction up to threshold (for instance wwtp>2000 IE)

Use of item « EuropeanOther » in « SWB_ProtectedArea_Status » table for UWWTP directive

For PA already reported, decision to be coherent with the last reporting, in order to be coherent






In « GWMET_ClassificationMatrix* » table, contradiction between guide instruction and validation process : in order to succeed in validation, removal of « beacons » « other pollutant » in xml file when « PollutantOrIndicator » item is filled in.

In « GWMET_ReferenceLINKS » table : necessity to add a reference for « GWMET_FurtherCharacterisation* » table.

For SWMethods scheme, several correction directly done in xml file :

Reminder : In France, these tables were filled in by environment ministry (not per basin)






For some non obligatory tables non filled in (RBMP_DeoxygenatingSubstances, RBMP_Nutrients, RBMP_PrioritySubstances, RBMP_SalineDischarge, RBMP_NonPrioritySpecificPollutants), removal of « beacons » in xml file (for instance :<PrioritySubstances/> ).

In « RBMP_SWNeedForSupplMeasure* » and « RBMP_GWNeedForSupplementaryMeasures » tables, obligation to complete for every « PressurePreventingGoodStatus* »; so you have to :

fill in a 0% for some water body category

let a blank for « BasicMeasuresEnough* »

correct the xml file in order to succeed in the validation





# Removal of "SWPressureMeasuresCheckList" when %mdo at risk = 0 for 1 subunit # for table RBMP_SWNeedForSupplMeasure Replace: <BasicMeasuresEnough /> <SWPressureMeasuresCheckList /> by <BasicMeasuresEnough /> # Removal of "GWNeedForSupplementaryMeasure" when %mdo à risque = 0 for one basin # in table RBMP_GWNeedForSupplementaryMeasures Replace: <BasicMeasuresEnough> <YesNo /> <GWPressureMeasuresCheckList /> </BasicMeasuresEnough> by <BasicMeasuresEnough> <YesNo /> </BasicMeasuresEnough>



Thank you for your attention…

Туининг Проект BG O7 IB EN 01 Укрепване на административния...

Documents

Transcript of Туининг Проект BG O7 IB EN 01 Укрепване на административния...