Post on 27-Jun-2020
1
Radiotoxicologie, Radiochimie, RadiopharmacieFARM 3200
Cours n° 7
RADIOPHARMACIE (1) Introduction et critères de qualité
Prof. Bernard Gallez
2
RadiopharmaceutiquesGénéralités
Radiopharmaceutique
= préparation pharmaceutique, contenant un ou plusieurs radionucléides, utilisée en médecine humaine ou vétérinaire, pour le diagnostic in vivo ou in vitro, ou pour la thérapie
Cas le plus courant:
nucléide radioactif sous forme non scellée, destiné à l’administration à un patient pour des raisons de diagnostic ou de thérapeutique
3
RadiopharmaceutiquesTypes de préparations
Produits enregistrés prêts à l’emploi
Nucléides contenu dans une formulation « stable »
Produits enregistrés « semi-préparés »
Générateurs
Kits
Produits « maison » (non enregistrés)
Radiopharmaceutiques PET non enregistrés
Anticorps, peptides radiomarqués
4
RadiopharmaceutiquesRéponse pharmacologique
Les composés doivent être radiomarqués avec une activité spécifique suffisamment hautepour minimiser les possibilités d’effets pharmacologiques
En principe, pas d’effet pharmacologique, sauf émanant d’allergie potentielle à un composant particulier ou modulation pharmacologique de la distribution radiopharmaceutique
5
RadiopharmaceutiquesInteractions médicamenteuses
Interactions désirées
Utilisation d’un médicament en vue d’induire une réponse pharmacologique qui influence la performance fonctionnelle d’un organe ou d’un tissu, cette performance étant mesurée à l’aide de la biodistribution du radiopharmaceutique
Interactions non-désirées
Modification non voulues des performances d’un radiopharmaceutique par la prise de médicaments
6
RadiopharmaceutiquesInteractions médicamenteuses
Exemples d’interactions désirées
Perfusion myocardique
Dipyridamole, adénosine, dobutamine
Perfusion cérébrale
Acétazolamide (Diamox)
Etudes rénales
Furosémide, captopril
Etudes hépato-biliaires
Cholecystokinine
7
RadiopharmaceutiquesInteractions médicamenteuses non désirées
8
RadiopharmaceutiquesInteractions médicamenteuses non désirées
9
RadiopharmaceutiquesInteractions médicamenteuses non désirées
10
RadiopharmaceutiquesFormes des préparations
Solutions vraies
Dispersions colloïdales
Suspension particulaires
Gaz
Aérosols (liquides dispersés en phase gazeuse)
Gélules
11
RadiopharmaceutiquesFacteurs affectant la Biodistribution
Perfusion
Débit sanguin régional
Perméabilité capillaire
Diffusion à travers membranes biologiques
Taille particulaire
Interactions cellulaires
Transport actif
Transport facilité
Phagocytose
Interactions/biotransformations intracellulaires
Elimination
Rénale
Bile
12
Quality control parameters
Radioactivity tests- radioativity
- identification of the nuclide
- radionuclidic purity
- radiochemical purity
- specific radioactivity
Specific tests for some radiopharmaceuticals- Physiological distribution
Usual tests for injectable solutions
- chemical purity
- sterility
- apyrogenicity
- pH
- isotonicity
13
Quality criteriaRadioactivity
Definition : radioactivity of a preparation = number of nucleardesintegrations or transformations per unit time.
Units (International System) : Becquerel (Bq) = 1 nucleartransformation per second
1 Ci = 3.7 1010 Bq = 37 GBq
1 mCi = 3.7 107 Bq = 37 MBq
1µCi = 3.7 104 Bq = 37 kBq
1 GBq = 27.027 mCi
1 MBq = 27.027 µCi
1 kBq = 27.027 nCi
Absolute radioactivity measurements require a specialized laboratorybut identification and measurement of radiation can be carried out comparatively and relatively by the use of radioactive standards.
14
Quality criteriaRadioactivity
The absolute measurement of radioactivity of a given samplemay be carried out if the decay scheme of the radionuclide isknown, but in practice many corrections are required to obtainaccurate results.
It is common to carry out the measurement with the aid ofprimary standard source.
Primary standards may not be available for short-livedradiopharmaceuticals.
For these radionuclides, the instruments may be calibrated usinga secondary standard (e.g. 57Co (T=270 days) can be used as secondary standard for 99mTc).
15
Counters
- Ionisation chambers and Geiger-Müller counters
> beta/gamma emitters
- Solid scintillators or semiconductor counters
> gamma emitters
- Liquid-scintillation counters
> low-energy beta emitters
Whatever apparatus is used, for an accuratecomparison of radioactive sources, it is essential for samples to be measured under identical conditions.
Quality criteriaRadioactivity
16
Quality criteriaRadioactivity / Specific problems
Quenching in liquid scintillationMeasurements should be corrected for light-quenching effects
Internal standardization
External standardization
17
Quality criteriaRadioactivity / Specific problems
Background
All measurements of radioactivity should be corrected by substracting the background activity due to radioactivity in theenvironment and to spurious signals generated in the equipmentitself
Dead time of counters
When measurements are made at high levels of radioactivity, itmay be necesary to correct for the finite resolving time of thedetector
Calibrations
The following factors should be taken into account:
Calibration factor
Sample geometry factor
Dynamic range accuracy
18
Quality criteriaRadioactivity
Statistics in counting
The results of determinations of radioactivity shows variations which mainly derive from the random nature ofnuclear transformations. A sufficient number of countsshould be registered in order to compensate for variations in the number of transformations per unit of time. Thestandard deviation is the square root of the counts, so atleast 10000 counts are necessary to obtain a relative standard deviation of not more than 1 per cent.
Reference to a time
All statements of radioactive content should be accompaniedby a statement of the date and the time at which themeasurment was made (and reference to a time zone if exported)
The radioactivity of a solution is expressed per unit volume to give the radioactive concentration
19
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclide
The radionuclide is identified by:
Measuring the half-life of the radionuclide
and/or
Determining the nature and energy ofthe radiation
20
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideHalf-lifeRadioactive decay
Radioactivity decays at an exponential rate which ischaracteristic for each radionuclide
The curve of exponential decay is described by the equation:
At = Ao.e-λt
At = the radioactivity at time t
Ao = the radioactivity at time = 0
λ = the decay constant characteristic of each radionuclide
E = the base of Napierian logarithms
o Half-life
The time in which a given quantity of radionuclide decays to half its initial value.
The half-life (T1/2) is related to the decay constant (λ) by theequation:
T1/2 = ln 2 / λ (ln 2 = 0.693)
21
The half-life is measured with a suitable detectionapparatus. The radioactivity chosen, having regard to experimental conditions, must be sufficiently high to allowdetection during several presumed half-lives, but should belimited to minimize count rate defects and effects such as dead time losses.
The same source is measured in the same geometricalconditions at intervals usually corresponding to half of thehalf-life throughout a time equal to about three half-lives.
A graph is drawn with time as the abcissa and thelogarithm of the instrument response as the ordinate.
The calculated half-life should not differ by more than5 per cent from the half-life stated in thepharmacopeia.
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideHalf-life
22
The nature and energy of the radiation emitted may bedetermined by several procedures including theconstruction of an attenuation curve and the use ofspectrometry
The attenuation curve is often used for analysis of β-
radiation
Liquid scintillation counting and spectrometry canbe used for α and β- emitters
γ spectrometry is used to identify radionuclides withgamma rays and detectable X-Rays.
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
23
Attenuation curve
The attenuation curve is drawn for β- emitters when nospectrometer for beta rays is available. This methodof estimating the maximum energy of beta radiations gives only an approximate value.
The source is placed in front of the window of GM counter or a proportionalcounter. The count rate is measured. Between the source and the counterare placed, in succession, at least six aluminium screens of increasing massper unit area within such limits that, with a pure beta emitter, this count rate is not affected by the addition of further screens. A graph is drawn in thesame manner for a standardized preparation. The mass attenuationcoefficients can be calculated from the median parts of the curves which are practically curvilinear.
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
24
Attenuation curve
The mass attenuation coefficient mx, expressed as square centimeters per milligram, depends on the energy of the betairradiation and on the nature and the physical properties of thescreen. It therefore allows beta emitters to be identified. It iscalculated using the equation:
µm = ln A1 – ln A2
m2 – m1
m1 = mass per unit area of the lightest screen
m2 = mass per unit area of the heaviest screen
A1 = count rate for mass per unit area m1
A2 = count rate for mass per unit area m2
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
25
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
26
Gamma spectrometry
The preferred detector for gamma and X-rays spectrometry isa germanium semi-conductor detector. A thallium-activated sodium iodide scintillation detector can also be usedbut this has a much lower energy resolution
The detector needs to be calibrated because the detectionefficiency is a function of the energy of the gamma and the X-ray as well as the form of the source and the source-to-detector distance. The detection efficiency may be measuredusing a calibrated source of the radionuclide to be measuredor a graph efficiency against gamma and X-rays energy maybe constructed from a series of calibrated sources of variousradionuclides.
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
27
Gamma spectrometry
The gamma and X-Ray spectrum of a radionuclide whichemits gamma and X-rays is unique to that nuclide and ischaracterized by the energies and the number of photons ofparticular energies emitted per transformation.
This property can be used to identify which radionuclides are present in a source and the amounts of each. It facilitates theestimation of the degree of radionuclidic impurity by detectingpeaks other than expected
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
28
Gamma spectrometry
Quality criteriaIdentification of the radionuclideNature and energy of radiations
29
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purity
Definition :
the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the radioactivityof the radionuclide concerned to the total radioactivity ofthe radiopharmaceutical preparation. The relevant radionuclidic impurities are listed with their limit in theindividual monographs.
In most of the cases, to state the radionuclidic purity of a radiopharmaceutical preparation, the radioactivities andthe identities of every radionuclide present must beknown.
30
Most generally used method :
- gamma spectrometry (semiconductors)
but : not suitable for alpha/beta emitters impurities
Other methods :
- half-lives determination
- « tricks » : use of screen (see 99Mo in 99mTc)
The gamma-ray spectrum should not be significantlydifferent from that a standardized preparation.
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purity
31
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purity
Specific set of limits may exist for specific impurities, depending on:
Radiotoxicity of the radionuclide
Production procedure99Mo produced by fission different from 99Mo produced by neutron activation
These requirements are not in themselves sufficient to ensurethat the radionuclidic purity of a preparation is sufficient for human use.
Depending on the procedures used, the contaminants can be foreseen.
The preparations should be examined for impurities of long half-lifedecay.
In cases of two or more positron emitting radionuclides need to be identifiedand differentiated, half-life determinations need to be carried out in addition to gamma spectrometry.
32
Due to differences in the half-lives of the differentradionuclides present in a radiopharmaceuticalpreparation, the radionuclidic purity changes withtimes.
The requirement of the radionuclidic puritymust be fulfilled throughout the period ofvalidity.
It is sometimes difficult to carry out these tests before authorising the release for use of the batch when the half-live is short. The test then consitutesa control of the quality of production.
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purity
33
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purity
The determination of half-life is a marker ofradionuclidic purity of a preparation
Example15O: T=2 min13N: T=10 min#1 100% 15O#2 99% 15O + 1% 13N#3 98% 15O + 2% 13N
Time (min)
34
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purityImportance of the production procedure
99Mo for 99mTc generators
- 98Mo(n,γ)99Mo
- nuclear fission of uranium and extraction : fission products
Development of new radionuclides in PET centers
e.g 86Y (β+,T=14.6h) produced by reaction (p,n) on a target of 86Sr using protons with energy of 16 MeV. If protons of 30 MeV, the reaction (p,2n) becomesimportant and leads to 85Y (β+/CE, 5h) whichdesintegrates to 85Sr(CE, 65d).
35
Importance of other contaminants coming from impurities in thetarget :
Target in Havar®. Havar contains 52Cr, 59Ni, 96Mo
Usual productions:
Nuclide produced Target Reaction
18F H218O 18O(p,n)18F
13N H216O 16O(p,α)13N
15O 14N214N(d,n)15O
11C 14N214N(p, α)11C
Identification at KUL (Leuven) and at UCL (Louvain-la-Neuve) of several contaminants in 18F and 13N, but not in 15O neither in 11C:
52Mn coming probably from 52Cr(p,n)52Mn56Co 59Ni(p, α)56Co96Tc 96Mo(p,n)96Tc
No impurity if the target is a gas. Impurities present when transfer
possible to a liquid target
Quality criteriaRadionuclidic purityImportance of the production procedure
36
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
Definition:
the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the radioactivity ofthe radionuclide concerned which is present in theradiopharmaceutical preparation in the stated chemical form, to the total of radioactivity of that radionuclide present in theradiopharmaceutical preparation. The relevant radiochemicalimpurities are generally listed with their limit in the individualmonographs.
The determination of radiochemical purity requiresseparation of the different chemical substances containingthe radionuclide and estimating the radioactivity associatedwith the declared chemical substance
37
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
Origin of radiochemical impurities:
Radionuclide production
Subsequent chemical procedures
Incomplete preparative separation
Chemical changes during storage
38
In principle, any method of analytical separation may beused in the determination of radiochemical purity. Themonographs for radiopharmaceutical products may includepaper chromatography, thin-layer chromatography, electrophoresis, size-exclusion chromatography, gaschromatography, liquid chromatography.
In hospital environment, paper chromatography andTLC are mostly used.
In paper and TLC chromatography, it s preferable not to dilute the preparation to be examined except
If the radioactivity amount is too high and can lead to loss due to the dead time of the counter
A carrier is needed to avoid unspecific adsorption on thesupport
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
39
After the development of the chromatography, thesupport is dried.
The positions of the radioactivity along the support isdetermined using different possible ways:
Autoradiography
Phosphorimager / Instant imager
Multi-channel position sensitive counters
Moving counters along the chromatogram
Suitable collimated counters (γ camera)
By cutting the strips and couting each portion
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
40
The position of the spots or areas permit the chemicalidentification by comparison with solutions of the samechemical substances (non radioactive) using a suitabledetection method
Radioactivity is measured by integration using plottinginstrument. When the strips are cut into portions, the ratios of the quantities of radioactivity measured give the ratio ofconcentrations of the radioactive chemical species
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
41
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
Exampleo-[123/131I]-iodohippurate
Tubular secretion markerExample of preparation: exchange of aromatic iodine catalyzed by cupperRadiochemical purityTLC on silicagel.Eluent: toluene/n-butanol-Acetic acid/water 80/20/4/1Carrier: o-iodohippuric acid, o-iodobenzoic acid, potassium iodine
Origin Front
I- HIP OIB
Synthesis Desired DegradationImpurity Product Product
42
For several radiolabelled compounds, there is a needto use more than one chromatography system to knowthe RCP
Example: HMPAO-99mTc
System 1: ITLC-Methylethylketone
Rf 0.8-1: TcO4- + HMPAO-Tc
Rf 0 : Hydrolyzed Tc + secondary complexes
System 2: ITLC – NaCl 0.9%
Rf 0.8-1: TcO4- + HMPAO-Tc + secondary complexes
Rf 0: Hydrolyzed Tc
Quality criteriaRadiochemical purity
43
Quality criteriaSpecific radioactivity
Definition: the radioactivity of a nuclide per unit mass ofthe element or of the chemical form concerned
Specific radioactivity is usually calculated taking intoaccount the radioactive concentration (radioactivity per unit volume) and the concentration of the chemical substance being studied, and verification that the radioactivity is onlyattributable to radionuclide (radionuclidic purity) and thechemical species (radiochemical purity) concerned.
44
Quality criteriaPhysiological distribution
A physiological distribution test is prescribed, if necessary, for certain radiopharmaceutical preparations.
The distribution pattern of radioactivity observed in specified organs, tissues or other body compartments ofan appropriate animal species (usually rats or mice) can bea reliable indication of the expected distribution in humansand thus the suitability for the intended purpose.
45
Quality criteriaPhysiological distribution
The individual monographs prescribe the detailsconcerning the performance of the test and thedistribution requirements which must be met for theradiopharmaceutical preparation.
A biodistribution conforming the requirements will assure appropriate distribution of the radiopharmaceuticalpreparation to the intended biological target in humans andlimits its distribution to non-target areas.
46
Quality criteriaPhysiological distribution
This test is applied when the physico-chemicalcharacterization of the radiolabelled compound is notfully described, and thus the relationship betweenchemical structure and biological behavior ispoorly understood (e.g. colloids labelled withtechnetium, diphosphonate complexes,…)
47
In general, the distribution is performed as follows:
Each of three animals is injected intravenously with the preparation to betested. If relevant, the species, sex, strain, and weight or age of theanimals is specified. The test injection should be theradiopharmaceutical as it is intended for human use. Productscomprising reagents for reconstitution should be reconstituted accordingto the manufacturer’s instructions. In some cases, dilution immediatelybefore the injection may be necessary.
The injection will normally be made via the intravenous route for whichpurpose the caudal veins are used. Other veins such as the saphenous, femoral, jugular or pudendal veins may be used in special cases. Animalsshowing extravasation of the injection should be rejected from the test.
Quality criteriaPhysiological distribution
48
In general, the distribution is performed as follows:
At the specified time after injection, the animals are killed by an appropriatemethod and dissected. Selected organs and tissues are assayed for theirradioactivity. The physiological distribution is calculated and expressed in terms of the percentage of radioactivity which is found in each of the selectedorgans or tissues. For this purpose, the radioactivity in an organ may berelated to the injected radioactivity calaculated from the radioactive content ofthe syringe measured before and after injection (minus the radioactivity foundat the point of injection). For some radiopharmaceutical preparations, it maybe appropriate to determine the ratio of the radioactivity in weighted samplesof selected tissues (radioactivity per gram).
To meet the requirements of the test, the distribution of radioactivity in atleast 2 of the 3 animals must comply with all the specified criteria (Importance of the « re-test » procedure)
Quality criteriaPhysiological distribution
49
Quality criteriaChemical purity
The determination of chemical purity requires identification and quantification of individual chemical constituents or impurities present in the radiopharmaceutical preparation
These tests include the quantification of
Normal consituents of a labelling kit (quantification of ligand, ofstannous tin)
Impurities (aluminium present in technetium generator eluates)
Synthesis precursors or catalysts (kryptofix in synthesis of [18F]-FDG
Residual solvents (synthesis of PET tracers)
50
Quality criteriaChemical purity
These tests should be conducted in
Industries manufacturing radiopharmaceuticals
PET centers
Several tests are important to perform in nuclearmedicine centers such as the detection of aluminium in generator eluates
51
Quality criteriaSterility
Radiopharmaceutical preparations for parenteraladministration must be prepared using precautionsdesigned to exclude microbial contamination and to ensure sterility
Special difficulties:
Small size of batches: sometimes limited to one or a fewsamples
Radiation hazards
Direct inoculation method: result known after several days
Not possible to await the results before release
52
Quality criteriaSterility
Generally, possibility for waiting the decrease of the
radioactivity and performing the sterility assay later
Test = control of quality of the production
Need for a performance test on the procedure used
53
Quality criteriaSterility
Direct transfer to test media or membrane filtration under aseptic conditions:
Fluid thioglycollate medium (bacteria) 30 to 35°C
Tryptic soy broth (fungi) 20 to 25°C
Use of positive and negative controls !
Reading after a few days (turbidity)
Alternative method: Membrane filtration technique
54
Shortcomings of the standard methods: time factor!
Recent developments in rapid microbiology methods:
Qualitative tests: Yes/No answer to the question ofmicrobial contamination
Quantitative tests: numerical value for the microbialcontents
Identification tests: identity of microorganisms
Detection of cells by labeling with fluorophores, cellauto-fluorescence, cell by-products, capillaryelectrophoretic method,…
Hope for a response about sterility before the batch release
Under evaluation by the FDA
Quality criteriaSterility
55
Quality criteriaBacterial endotoxins - Pyrogens
Endotoxins = polysaccharides from bacterial membranes (Gram -)
Water soluble
Heat stable
Filtrable
Importance for working in aseptic conditions along theproduction process
All glassware and equipment (when possible) should be heated at200°C for at least 2 hours before production
Problems:
Fever
Leukopenia, pain in joints, headache, specially in immunodepressedpatients
56
Quality criteriaBacterial endotoxins - PyrogensAssay:
LAL test (Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate)
Gel formation in the presence of endotoxins
! Operating procedures (meticulous handling necessary: many
false positive results)
! Interference by inhibition or activation
If LAL impossible, increase of temperature observed after
IV injection to 3 rabbits (Eur. Pharm.:Pyrogens)
57
Novel pyrogen tests based on the human fever reaction
Proposed alternative to LAL and tests on rabbits
Why?
Limitations of the present tests:
LAL: limited to Gram – (missing Gram + and fungal pyrogens)
Rabbits: use of animals
New tests based on:
Release of fever mediators such as IL-1
In vitro test with human cells
Not yet approved in many countries
In discussion at the European Pharmacopeia
For more information, see ATLA 30, S2, 49-51, 2002
Quality criteriaBacterial endotoxins - Pyrogens
58
Quality criteriaOther tests
pH
Should be in the physiologically acceptable range (5-8) andoptimized for the stability of the preparation
! Specially important to check in PET centers when operatingprocedures include extreme pH conditions at one particular step(hydrolysis step)
Physical appearance / Particulate contamination
All products for administration by injection (except colloids andaggregates) should be free from particulates
Visual examination
Strict control of the glassware
59
Particle size
Lung perfusion studies: MAA and microspheres (20-80 microns)
RES: coloids (less than 1 micron)
Light scattering / Photon correlation techniques
In routine: filtration through polycarbonate membranes withcontrolled etched pores
Isotonicity
Osmometers (cryoscopic decrease or change in vapour tensions)
Quality criteriaOther tests