Post on 02-Aug-2020
Cornell University, November 27, 2012
Fractional ac Josephson effect:
the signature of Majorana particles
Leonid Rokhinson Department of Physics, Department of Electrical Engineering
and Birck Nanotechnology Center
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana USA
Jacek Furdyna (Notre Dame)
Xinyu Liu (Notre Dame)
Dirac vs Majorana
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 2
(๐๐พ๐๐๐ โ ๐๐)๐=0
๐ =๐๐
- 4-spinor
๐พ0 =0 ๐ผ๐ผ 0
;
Dirac g-matrices:
๐ธ =0 โ๐๐ 0
Majorana ๐พ -matrices
๐พ 0 = ๐0 โ๐1
๐1 0; ๐พ 1 = ๐
0 ๐ผ๐ผ 0
;
๐พ 2 = ๐๐ผ 00 โ๐ผ
; ๐พ 3 =0 ๐2
โ๐2 0
Frank Wilczek, Majorana returns, Nature Physics 5, 614 (2009)
Majorana transformation
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 3
decoherence and dephasing
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 4
|โ
|โ ๐ = ๐ผ โ + ฮฒ|โ
spin flip ๐๐ฅ|โ = |โ phase flip ๐๐ง(|โ + โ = (|โ โ โ
|0
|1 ๐ = ๐ผ 0 + ฮฒ|1
good classical bit, but not quantum:
phase fluctuations ฮ๐ป โ ๐๐โ ๐๐
๐๐โ |0 = |1 , ๐๐|1 = |0
fault-tolerant qubit
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 5
|0
|1 ๐ = ๐ผ 0 + ฮฒ|0
letโs create localized modes:
๐พ๐ = ๐๐โ + ๐๐
๐พ๐2 = 1 โ energy offset, no phase errors
new effective fermionic operators:
๐ = (๐พ๐ + ๐๐พ๐)
๐โ = (๐พ๐ โ ๐๐พ๐)
dephasing ฮ๐ป โ ๐โ ๐ โ ๐๐พ๐๐พ๐
separate l and m in space !!!
Kitaev, 2001
Majorana operator
statistics
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 6
k l k l
๐๐๐ โ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ โ Abelian anyons
๐๐ =๐โ๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ =๐โ๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ โ non-Abelian anyons
๐๐ =๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐ ๐๐ =๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐
Majorana particles in 2D are non-Abelian anyons
1 2 2 1
in general ๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐ โ ๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐
๐โ๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ = ๐โ๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐
Wilczek โ82-84
Topological quantum computing
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 7
John Preskill, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/exotic_c04/preskill/oh/21.html
intrinsically fault tolerant quantum computing
can we engineer Majorana particles?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 8
Kitaevโs toy model (2001)
g1 g2 g3 g4 gj gL gj+1
a1 a2 aL aj
g1 b1 gL b2 bj
๐ป = โ๐ก ๐๐โ ๐๐+1 + ๐๐+1
โ ๐๐ โ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐โ โ
1
2+ ฮ๐๐๐๐+1 + ฮโ๐โ
๐๐โ ๐+1
๐
tunneling
between cites
# of particles
(Fermi level)
superconducting
coupling D = t > 0, m = 0
one fermion, does not enter Hamiltonian ๐ป = ๐๐ก ๐๐โ ๐๐ โ 1
2
๐ฟโ1
๐=1
๐๐ = 12(๐พ2๐ +๐๐พ2๐+1)
๐๐โ = 1
2(๐พ2๐ โ ๐๐พ2๐+1)
fermion transformation
g๐๐โ๐
= ๐๐ + ๐๐โ
g๐๐
= โ๐(๐๐ โ ๐๐โ )
Majorana transformation
๐ป = ๐๐ก ๐พ2๐๐พ2๐+1
๐
can we engineer Majorana particles?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 9
Kitaevโs toy model (2001)
requirements:
1D
spinless (one mode)
superconductor
topological superconductor
g1 b1 gL b2 bj ๐ป = ๐๐ก ๐๐โ ๐๐ โ 1
2
๐ฟโ1
๐=1
new operator: ๐พ = โ๐๐พ1๐พ๐ฟ
two ground states |0 , |1 ๐พ|0 = +|1 - even electron parity ๐พ|1 = โ|0 - odd electron parity
gโ1 bโ1 gโL bโ2 bโj
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 10
โข superfluid He3 Salomaa & Volovik โ87
โข excitation in n=5/2 FQHE Moore & Read โ91
โข 1D organic semiconductors Senigupta, et al โ01
โข array of coupled flux qubits Levitov, Orlando, et al โ01
โข cold atoms Gurarie, Radzihovsky & Andreev โ05
โข p-wave superconductors (Sr2RuO4) Das Sarma, Nayak, Tewari โ06
โข topological insulator/superconductor Fu & Kane โ08
โข surface of semiconductor/superconductor Sau, et al โ10, Alicea, et al โ10
low dimensionality
spinless quasiparticles
superconducting interactions
can we engineer Majorana particles?
+
Semiconductor / s-wave superconductor
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 11
s-wave superconductor quasiparticles:
semiconductor with spin-orbit interaction:
๐ป =๐2
2๐ + ๐พ ๐ ร ๐ + ๐๐ต๐ โ ๐ต
kCooper pairs k k
k
2g
Semiconductor / s-wave superconductor
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 12
k
2gD
Bso
B
kk
EZ
B = 0 Bso
|| B
EZE
F
s-wave superconductor quasiparticles:
semiconductor with spin-orbit interaction:
๐ป =๐2
2๐ + ๐พ ๐ ร ๐ + ๐๐ต๐ โ ๐ต
p-wave pairng
possible
kCooper pairs k k
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
ma
gn
eto
resis
tan
ce
(k
)
B (Tesla)
magnetic
focusing
GCGinj
Gdet
1
2
4
3
Can we see k-splitting?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 13
magnetic focusing
V I
R2D gas
eB
kRkkE F
cFFF
& : @
Rokhinson, Larkina, Lyanda-Geller, Pfeiffer & K.W. West
"Spin separation in cyclotron motion", PRL 93, 146601 (2004)
p
E
EF
g g
4 1/ 4 5 10 cmBeLg D
choice of material
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue University 14
15 nm QW
105 V/cm
parameter space
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 15
๐ธ๐ > ๐ฅ2 + ๐ธ๐น2
Bso
B
single-spin condition:
]110[
[110] kx
ky d=20nm
w>200nm
๐ธ๐~๐ธ๐๐ to protect superconductivity:
2 22 2 ( / )SO D z DE k k d kg g
6 12.6 [meV], [10 cm ]SOE k k
d=100nm 6 10.1 [meV], [10 cm ]SOE k k
What are we looking for?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 16
a. States at zero energy: enhanced tunneling at zero bias
density of states
trivial superconductor
topological superconductor
simulated tunneling conductance
as a function of a tuning parameter
Stanescu, Lutchyn & Das Sarma โ2011
Zero bias anomaly in mesoscopic physics
Kondo effect in 0D systems
โ0.7 anomalyโ in 1D wires
etc.
What are we looking for?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 17
b. modification of the Josephson phase
trivial superconductor charge-2e Cooper pairs, I sin(f)
topological superconductor charge-e Majorana particles, I sin(f/2)
Kwon โ04 Lutchyn โ10
Kitaev โ01
wafers
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 18
In60Ga30Sb 3 nm InSb 20 nm In60Ga30Sb 3 nm
In77Al23Sb 120 nm
InxGa1-xSb graded 1280 nm
GaSb:Te substrate
Nb
fabrication
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 19
290 nm
120 nm
10 mm
dc rf ~
V
etch ~50 nm
T-dependence of JJs
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80
1
2
L
JJ8 40 nm gap
JJ7 30 nm gap
JJ6 20 nm gap
TC2
R (
k
)
temperature (K)
TC1
TC3
TC 0 1 2
0.0
0.5
1.0
TC3
TC
TC
R (
k
)
T (K)
3He system dilution fridge
TC1 โ w>6 mm
TC2 โ w=1 mm
TC3 โ w=0.1 mm
TC โ JJ proximity effect
๐ฅ = ๐ฅ๐
๐
๐ + ๐ฅ๐
Ds=1.76 kBTC3/e = 310 meV
D =1.76 kBTC/e = 180 meV
l ~ 2.6 D
junctions on i-GaAs
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 21
0 2 4 6 8 10 120.1
1
10
100 line
junction
(40 nm gap)
R (
k
)
Tc3
Tc2
T (K)
Tc1
0 100 200 300 400
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
WL
hei
ght
(nm
)
x (nm)
WL
devices with the gap > 20 nm are insulating
field dependence of Ic
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 22
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I (mA)
B || I (T
esla
)
10
632
1255
1878
2500
dV/dI ()
JJ
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I (mA)
B ||
I (
Tes
la)
0.000
0.1300
0.2600
0.3250
L10
0.1 mm - wide line
Bc~2.5 Tesla
samples
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 23
Typical V(I) characteristics excess current โ Andereev reflection
sign of coherent transport
-0.9 -0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
VR
IC
V (
mV
)
I (mA)
IR
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.50
1
2
I (u
A)
V (mV)
0.0 0.4 0.8
1
2
0T
3T
RN ร
dI/
dV
V (mV)
0 1 2 3 4
1
2
RN ร
dI/
dV
B (Tesla)
ac Josephson effect
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 24
๐1 ๐2
V
๐(ฮ๐)
๐๐ก=
2๐๐
โ
๐ผ๐ = ๐ผ๐ sin ๐๐ฝ๐ก = ๐ผ๐ sin2๐๐
โ๐ก
Current oscillates with frequency V
direct inverse
๐1 ๐2
I
๐ผ = ๐ผ0 + ๐ผ๐sin(๐๐ก)
Constant voltage steps w
๐2 โ ๐1 = ๐๐ = ๐โ๐
2๐
inverse ac Josephson effect
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 25
phase locking between external rf and Josephson frequency
Shapiro steps (Shapiro โ63) ๐๐ = ๐โ๐๐๐
๐
-200 0 200
-24
-16
-8
0
8
16
24
f = 2 GHz
DV= 4 mV
f = 3 GHz
DV= 6 mV
V (
mV
)
I (nA)
f = 4 GHz
DV= 8 mV
-200 0 200-30
-24
-18
-12
-6
0
6
12
18
24
30
I (nA)
-200 0 200
-28
-24
-20
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
I (nA)
๐ = 2๐
-200 0 200
-24
-12
0
12
24
-200 0 200 -200 0 200 -200 0 200 -200 0 200
V (
mV
)
I (nA)
B=0 B=1.0 T
I (nA)
B=1.6 T
I (nA)
B=2.1 T
I (nA)
B=2.5 T
I (nA)
Disappearance of the first Shapiro step
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 26
f = 3 GHz
Shapiro steps
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 27
0 300 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100-200 0 200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Vrf (
mV
)
I (nA)
0
5
10
dV/dIB=0, f = 3 GHz
DI0 (nA) DI
1DI
2DI
3DI
4
-40
-32
-24
-16
-8
0
8
16
24
32
40
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300
0
20
40
f = 4 GHz
Vrf = 14.25 mV
V (
mV
)
dV
/dI
I (nA)
more fields
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 28
-200 0 200
I (nA)
-200 0 200
I (nA)
-200 0 200
I (nA)
-200 0 200
I (nA)
-200 0 200
I (nA)
0 T 1.0 T 1.6 T 2.1 T 2.5 T
(1)
(2) (3)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2) (2) (2)
dV/dI vs B
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 29
step @ 6 mV step @ 12 mV
consistency check
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 30
2 or 4 periodicity
width of the steps
third step and higher odd steps?
f f
vs A
theory: ๐ผ๐ โฒ ๐โ ฮ๐๐๐ โ 25 nA
experiment: ๐ด โ 150 nA
Q1
Q2
Q3
gap closing at the transition
๐ด โ 0 for ๐ต โ 2 Tesla
Q4
2 or 4 periodicity?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 31
Infinite wire: ๐ผยฑ = ยฑ๐๐ค
2โsin ๐ฅ๐ 2 โ
3๐๐ค2
16โ๐กsin ๐ฅ๐
Lutchyn, Sau & das Sarma โ10
Alicea, et al, โ11
IM IC
For G~D IM ~IC
effect of finite size:
levels anticrossing
Jiang, et al โ11
Pikulin & Nazarov โ11
San-Jose, Prada & Aguado โ12
Domรญnguez, Hassler & Platero โ12
even and odd steps should be visible
2 or 4 periodicity?
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 32
voltage bias current bias
Domรญnguez, Hassler, and Platero , โ12
100 GHz
๐ผยฑ = ยฑ๐๐ค
2โsin ๐ฅ๐ 2 โ
3๐๐ค2
16โ๐กsin ๐ฅ๐
Lutchyn, Sau & das Sarma โ10
Alicea, et al, โ11
IM IC
For G~D IM ~IC
๐๐๐ < 5๐บ๐ป๐ง
no odd steps for
current biased junction
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 33
Domรญnguez, Hassler, and Platero , arXiv:1202.0642
no odd steps for ๐๐๐ <2๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐
โ
A =Ic+IM/ 2
for Icโซ IM no substantial change of step width
step width ฮ๐ผ๐=A|๐ฝ๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐ |
๐ผ๐ = 10 ๐ผ๐
A1
A2
3-rd and higher odd steps
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 34
-0.9 -0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
VRIC
V (
mV
)
I (mA)
IR
1-st step: 6 mV
3-rd step: 18 mV
vcr~20 mV
VR~60 mV
A3
no gap closing at the transition (๐ฐ๐ โ ๐)
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 35
a. there is some reduction of the Ic at 2 Tesla: A4
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I (mA)
B || I (T
esla
)
10
632
1255
1878
2500
dV/dI ()
b. gappless superconductivity?
when density of gappless excitation
small compared to the gapped ones, Ic>0
conclusions
11/6/2012 Leonid Rokhinson, Purdue Univesity 36
โข 1D Josephson junction Nb/InSb/Nb
โข Excess current - evidence of Andreev reflection
โข Observe Shapiro steps with 2 periodicity
โข At high field first step disappears: 4 periodicity
Clear evidence of the formation of zero energy Andreev states
(Majorana particles)
arXiv: 1204.4212; Nature Physics, AOP 10.1038/nphys2429