Post on 08-Sep-2015
description
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 1/23
Conserveries mmoriellesRevue transdisciplinaire de jeunes chercheurs
#9 | 2011 :Les reprsentations du pass : entre mmoire et histoire3. Les muses et les sites historiques : un pass reprsent
The Emotional Museum.Thoughts on the SecularRelics of Nineteenth-CenturyHistory Museums in Paris andtheir PosterityFELICITY BODENSTEIN
Rsums
Franais EnglishCet article examine le discours labor dans les muses dhistoire Paris au cours duXIXe sicle trav ers la prsentation deffets personnels et priv s ay ant appartenu des personnages historiques clbres, des artistes ou criv ains. Comment etpourquoi a-t-on choisi de prsenter des objets en soi aussi banals et profanes que lemouchoir de Napolon ou une boucle des chev eux de Marie-Antoinette ? Dans le cadrerationnel du muse public, quel sens peut-on encore donner ces objets qui nefournissent pas dinformation documentaire et qui nont pour ainsi dire pas de v aleuresthtique ?
De fait, cette tradition musographique a encore toute sa place dans les musesdaujourdhui, surtout dans les muses maisons et les muses biographiques. Nousallons considrer son apparition depuis la Rv olution comme la transposition depratiques commmorativ es chrtiennes dans le monde lac de ltat rpublicain, maisaussi comme le transfert dun culte priv dans le domaine public. Cela nous permetdexaminer le caractre affectif des rapports que ces objets tablissent av ec lhistoire.
This article examines the discourse elaborated in Paris historical museums during thenineteenth century through the display of personal, priv ate objects hav ing belongedto famous historical figures, artistes and writers. How and why do we exhibit objectsin and of themselv es as banal as the handkerchief of Napoleon or locks of Marie-Antoinettes hair? In the scheme of the rational public museum, what meaning wasand is still giv en to these objects of little documentary or artistic importance?
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 2/23
Indeed this museographical tradition still holds an important place in museumstoday , especially in biographical or personal museums, its appearance during theRev olution and its subsequent dev elopment will be considered as the transposition of acommemorativ e practice taken from Catholicism and introduced into the secularworld of French Republican museum but also as a transfer from the priv ate to thepublic sphere. This allow us to examine the agency of such objects as triggers thatallow history to be experienced as an emotion.
Texte intgral
Inspired by the possibilities of new interactive media, the twenty -first century
museum often maintains its v isitors attention by stimulating his senses: sound,
smell and touch, as a response to our y earning for affect. In some cases this has
lead curators to consciously develop an emotional dimension that the rational
museum for a long time had officially sought to banish. Our particular concern
here will be to examine how history museums offer their v isitors the experience
of an emotionally colored past, rather than a purely intellectual reconstruction
that can remain fragmentary without the binding power of sentiment. Though
our demonstration will mainly rely on examples of Parisian museums in the
Nineteenth-century , we would like to state that the museological strategies that
they will serve to illustrate have been recently adopted by the organizers of the
Cit de limmigration in Paris and by the Muse de lEurope in Brussels,
museums which both opened their doors in October of 2007 . In the press
release which accompanied the opening of the Cit de limmigration, in the
Palais de la Porte Dore,1 the v isitors circuit is described as open, interactive,
based on a series of immersive, emotional and pedagogical experiences;
trajectories, movements, biographical fragments are brought to life thanks to
indiv idual tales and testimonies, v isual installations and projections, games and
objects.2 The Muse de lEurope, which has not y et found a definite home,
inaugurated its existence with an exhibition entitled: This is our History : a
moving expo on Europe. Here again scenographical intentions are
unambiguously expressed: We want to awaken public interest in Europes
History , especially in y oung people, by appealing to their emotions, by making
them feel that this history concerns them too as their past and their future.3 In a
bid to contribute to the construction of European identity , or to change our
attitudes towards immigration these exhibitions rely on some of today s latest
media technology . Museum discourses generally refer to their implementation
as a means to make the v isitor feel like an actor rather than a passive spectator of
his own history . Both of these exhibits have however also chosen to integrate
classical object-orientated approaches which have been totally abandoned in
other new history museums, such as the Historial Charles de Gaulle, monument
audiovisuel, inaugurated in February 2008 in the Invalides in Paris and which
as the title suggests is based exclusively on audio-v isual footage. So our prev ious
examples may be seen as an attempt to overcome a gulf [that] has opened
between those museums which value these new approaches [interactive,
dramatic] and those that want to maintain the primacy of their collections
(Spalding, 2002: 51).
1
Y et what do these display s stand to gain from the presence of what are
sometimes rather banal every day objects? It would appear that in the examples
cited above, objects have been used for their capacity to materialize an
otherwise abstract past, as the means to overcome absence through the
2
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 3/23
intriguing power of presence (Maniura, Shepard, 2007 ). In the Muse de
lEuropes first exhibit, the artist Dominique Blain prov ided a highly aesthetic
v ision of Europe born out of the Second World War, embodied through posters,
chewing gum wrappers and ny lon stockings that are supposed to incarnate a
common experience of hope. The Cit de limmigration has included a Galerie
des dons in its circuit, inv iting v isitors to deposit objects for display that were
meaningful to their personal experience of immigration with an explicative text
that according to the press release will allow singular traces, every day objects to
become souvenirs, or rather more, sy mbols. Like Proust lending us his
madeleine, the memories of history s actors are lent to the spectator and the
private experience of recollection through a personal object is made public and
collective.4
Let us now reconsider this general trend to capture public imagination
through memorial and emotional strategies related to objects, by looking at the
origins of this kind of display in the modern museum from the French Revolution
onwards. Our analy sis will essentially be based on one particular category of
display in museums related to French national history : objects labelled as
having belonged to either famous historical, artistic or literary personalities,
or, as we have called them, secular relics. Our aim is to show how such objects
contributed to the specificity of historical narrative in the museum, a question
that has been addressed in recent y ears by such authors as Laurent Gervereau in
France or Jrn Rsen in Germany . In attempting to define the nature of this
specificity , Jrn Rsen underlined the importance of taking into account often
overlooked or underestimated aesthetic factors that contribute to giv ing
historical documents meaning and to establishing narratives in the museum. He
argues that they characterize one of three forces at work in the construction of
historical discourse: the political, scientific and artistic (Rsen, 1988: 11). As we
recognize these forces, we may y et ask how historical museums deal with the
evocation of mans personal experience of the past, where can it find a place in
this trilogy and how should museum curators deal with emotional factors? We
will try and show that the emotional museum can provoke, promote or
accompany any or all three of these forces. By examining how the memorial
value of personal objects was used and sanctified in the museum our objective is
to prov ide an historical basis for a better understanding of how museums use
objects to bear witness to history . For by adopting display s like the ones
described above by placing ny lon stockings in a glass case related to the after-
war y ears the museum uses an apparently direct means of v isualizing historical
narrative. Y et, such items are more than just simple illustrations of an event or
an epoch. As distinct from texts or two-dimensional images which represent the
past in an already abstracted form, objects that were once used, held, caressed,
contemplated, smelt or even eaten are immediate, concrete and moreover of a
fundamentally sensual nature. They are not only sy necdochical figures of an
historical event; they are sy necdochical figures of the human experience of
history . It is the direct and v iv id experience of history in the museum which will
interest us here as a ritual form of dealing with memory (Duncan, 1995). After a
brief presentation of the museums that we have chosen to look at, we will use
them to consider the reliquary -ty pe display and what forms it took in history
museums from the French Revolution onwards. We will then try and examine
how and why such objects were acquired by museums by considering the
attitudes expressed by donors and curators, which will lead us to discuss their
3
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 4/23
From the Birth of the Museum
agency and the v isiting public.
The object hav ing belonged to and what might be considered its most
extreme form, bodily remains such as hair or even ashes, appears in Paris first
public museums during the Revolution. A direct result of the eighteenth century
culte des grands hommes (Glover, 2000: 47 6), the display of personal effects or
contact-relics, remained a recurrent representational strategy in historical
museums, promoting an intimate, communal evocation of the past. We will
consider this museographical tradition as the result of both material and
semantic transfers that may be schematized as passages from religious to secular
and from private to public realms. Predictably , in museums founded during the
first half of the nineteenth century exceptionally unclear frontiers operate
between these spaces. This is not to suggest that personal relics had not been
cherished before or that saintly relics were to disappear, we simply intend to
discuss their appearance in the new public, secular institution of the museum.5
4
The transfer of practices between secular and religious spaces may of course
be explained by the brutal rupture with traditional religious practice caused by
the Revolution, which suddenly transplanted the near entire range of material
culture related to the Church into the hands of a newly born republican state. As
churches were transformed into museums, many true religious relics entered
the newly created national museums, such as the Cabinet des mdailles at the
Bibliothque nationale, which received parts of the treasure of Saint-Denis et the
Sainte-Chapelle. As to transfers from private to public spaces, the creation of
our new relics, most of which were former private possessions, was above all the
work of indiv iduals: curators and donors. Each of the museums that we will look
at was born of one indiv iduals personal initiative meaning that private and
public spheres were in constant interference: Alexandre Lenoirs Muse des
Monuments Franais, first opened in 17 95; Alexandre du Sommerards Muse
de lhtel Cluny, became fully public in 1844 and Louis-Napoleon inaugurated
his Muse des Souverains in 1853 (although in this last case of a sovereign ruler
there can be no clear separation between the private indiv idual and his national
agenda). Our first two examples have been rigorously and eloquently described
and analy zed by authors such as Stephen Bann, Francis Haskell, Andrew
MacClellan, Dominique Poulot and as such are well know paradigms of early
French history museums. The Muse des Souverains has received somewhat less
attention; a recent publication analy zing Napoleon IIIs liste civile does however
prov ide some essential insights into its conception (Granger, 2005). Created in
the galleries of the Louvre, it was a direct expression of the new leaders desire to
legitimate his reign by underlining his direct affiliation with Napoleon, and by
presenting himself as a central figure in Frances genealogy of power. It was the
first time that historical memorabilia became the principal concern of any
museums official acquisition policy . Other museums, created in the second half
of the century , will also be drawn upon for examples. The Muse des Archives de
lEmpire opened in 1867 . Its creators described it as a kind of public portal-like
space to be placed before the closed corridors of the national archives, the
sanctuary of French History , to use the very terms employ ed by its first
curator.6 The Muse Carnavalet which was instigated by Haussmann in 1867 to
5
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 5/23
Reliquary forms in earlymanifestations of secular veneration
preserve some of the rapidly disappearing traces of the vieuxParis, and finally
Victor Hugos house museum, place des Vosges. Strictly speaking this last
example falls into the category of personal museums, but the strong national
impact of Hugos life and personality , his immediate inhumation in Frances
Pantheon of Great Men in 1885 allows it to be considered amongst the capitals
nationally orientated history museums.
Let us begin by first examining some presentations of personal objects or
bodily remains that borrow the formal aspect of their display from the catholic
tradition of the reliquary . The persistence of such a formal kinship may either be
considered as exemplary of the desire to preserve the material remains of the
past by giv ing them new meaning in post-revolutionary society or as the
nostalgic desire to recall lost forms of veneration. In the complex ty pology of
reliquaries, one of the most common forms is that of a sarcophagus or a
miniature church, it is the one that we recognize most often in the nineteenth-
century museum.
6
A famous and literal quotation of a catholic reliquary -ty pe presentation can be
attributed to Dominique-Vivant Denon, who directed the Louvre from 1802 to
1815, and in which he used an actual fifteenth-century reliquary to exhibit
sy mbolic remains related to medieval history or to the Empire. It included such
relics as a lock of Agnes Sorels hair, a bloody piece of the shirt that Napoleon
had worn on his deathbed and a leaf from the tree that grew over his grave
(Bresc-Bautier, 2001). However, it was not as director of the Louvre, but as a
private collector that Denon indulged in such historical fetishism. This may not
be said for Alexandre Lenoir, who probably prov ided Denon with some of the
remains present in his reliquary and who established a collection of corps
historiques that was clearly destined to be public (Poulot, 2007 : 17 1). His first
biographer, M. Allou, described Lenoirs museographical talent as that of a
clever sorcerer (Poulot, 1986: 499). His efforts to seduce the v isitors of his
Muse des monuments franais were most obv iously expressed in the Jardin
lyse, perhaps the most personal part of Lenoirs famous undertaking. The
former gardens of the convent des Petits-Augustins that he transformed in 17 99
into a strange, Pantheon-like park, were the heart of Lenoirs museum and as
such had been specifically designed for the sensitive soul (Greene, 1981: 214).
These gardens offer a very different context compared to the more rational
attempts at a chronological presentation of French sculptural arts that were
budding in the galleries of the convent. Lenoir decorated the lawns and groves of
his park with a remarkable series of displaced tombs that he had rebuilt in what
can be interpreted as a direct reaction to the destructions of the roy al
sepulchres in the Saint-Denis cathedral. Not content for them to remain simple
cenotaphs, he began to actively seek out bodily remains of celebrated French
men and women. His efforts proved fruitful and he soon had the bodily relics of
Molire, Descartes, La Fontaine, Turenne and others transferred to his museum.
A popular military hero of Louis XIII and Louis XIVs reign, Turenne fulfilled the
requirements of republican patriotism and so his body was spared destruction
7
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 6/23
after being unearthed at Saint-Denis in 17 93. Miraculously well preserved, it was
kept for five y ears at the Musum dHistoire Naturelle. In a plea for its transfer to
the Muse des Monuments Franais, Beaumarchais called for its display there in
a glass frame that [would allow] us to see the heros body , [whose display ]
would command our respect (Glover-Lindsay , 2000: 485). However, Lenoir
preferred a more discreet method of presentation. The relics he collected were
not to be made directly v isible to the public. This did not mean however that
their presence was not considered to be an important element in heightening the
emotional experience of his v isitors. In some cases, such as for Hlose and
Ablard,7 the acquisition of bodily remains called for the creation of a new
monument : in 1800 Lenoir went himself to the abbaye du Paraclet to recover
Abelards bones. In order to unite the my thical couple, he constructed a
monumental reliquary from an assortment of medieval monuments and tombs,
still to be seen in the Pre-Lachaise cemetery today . In his 1801 guide to the
museum he writes : Buried in the tomb, they live on, these inseparable friends,
they call to each other forever, making the names of Hlose and Ablard heard
through the stone that covers them ; the air v ibrates with their soft tones and the
plaintive echo reverberates throughout : Hlose !, Ablard !, Hlose !,
Ablard ! (quoted by Glover-Lindsay , 2000 : 486). If he made touch and sight
impossible, the sensorial importance usually attached to relics, albeit inv isible,
remained all the stronger as the marble figures of the couple became references
to the bodies buried beneath.
It is characteristic of the revolutionary period, during which the heritage of
the Ancien Rgime was regenerated through strategies of remploi, that the
transfers from Christian tradition here described should be so literal in form.
After the Restoration in 1816 and despite Lenoirs offer to build a chapel and
have daily mass read to make up for the initial sacrilege, his relics were restored
to hallowed ground (Greene, 1981 : 217 ). Fifty y ears later in the Muse des
Archives de lEmpire the testament of Louis XVI and the last letter written by
Marie-Antoinette were shown to the public enshrined in a black, Boulle sty le
display cabinet decorated with reliquary -like pediments (James-Sarazin,
2004 : 227 ) ; unfortunately we have no v isual documentation of this display .
Most often the reliquary form of display remained related to a very personal
choice. This meant that generally the object found its way into the museum
already enshrined, as is the case of the famous Reliquary of Roy al Mementoes
created for the duchesse de Tourzel (Wrigley , 2002 : 25) an exceptional piece
that was given to the Carnavalet in 1994.
8
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 7/23
F. Bodenstein 2007.
Photo 1: Mme de Tourzels Reliquary of Royal Mementoes, at the Muse Carnavalet.
However we must add that in some cases the museum as a whole was designed
and interpreted as a reliquary -ty pe space, the Muse des Souverains prov ides us
with an excellent example. In 1853, Horace de Viel-Castel, the museums first
director, praised the striking overall effect that the room dedicated to the
souvenirs of Napoleon would have on its v isitors. He described how its lighting
and decoration had been designed to produce a contemplative atmosphere that
called for religious silence in this funerary monument dedicated to the memory
of Napoleon as the spiritual counterpart to his earthly body s resting place at the
Invalides8(Viel-Castel, 1853 : 189-190). A contemporary journalist clearly
described his v isit to the museum using a series of metaphors related to the idea
of pilgrimage.9 A less official, less political and more intimate example of a
memorial cult on an important spatial scale is the faithful reconstitution in
Victor Hugos house museum, place des Vosges, of the bedroom in which the
famous poet drew his last breath. Donated to the city by Paul Meurice, the
museum opened in 1903 in the house that the author had inhabited from 1832 to
1848. Its v isitors circuit ends with the bedroom including all of the furniture
and decorative items that were found in his room in the apartment avenue
dEy lau when he died, creating what Arsne Alexandre qualified in his terms as a
true sanctuary .1 0 Interestingly , if we compare the description of the room
given in a 1912 guidebook we can appreciate how little this installation has
changed over time and in a sense the funerary atmosphere has even been
reinforced thanks to the dim lighting prov ided by electric candles.1 1(Quentin-
Bauchart, 1912 : 132 ).
9
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 8/23
F. Bodenstein 2007.
Photo 2: Victor Hugos bedroom, Muse Victor Hugo, place des Vosges.
Objects of private devotion in publicspaces
Although such examples appear particularly striking, there were, relatively
speaking, few formal citations of the catholic reliquary or tomb principle in the
display of public collections. Such an explicit reference, directly connotating
conservative, roy alist values, had to be considered out of place in the republican
museum. As was to be expected any such reference gave way to a set of formal
codes specific to secular museum culture.
10
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 9/23
Throughout the second half of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the
twentieth century private collectors and indeed family members chose public
collections, that guaranteed the inalienability of their holdings, as the most
suitable last resting place for personal treasures either related to the lives of
some celebrated figure or linked to some important historical event. An
examination of the catalogues of the Muse Carnavalet show a sharp decline in
this ty pe of donation from the 1930s onwards. Taken as an historical
phenomenon, the number of donations concerning such items follows the same
evolution as that of other collectables like national antiquities particularly in
vogue in the nineteenth century . However, it would appear that more so than
other museums, the Muse des Souverain and later the Muse Carnavalet both
relied heav ily on the generosity of private donators for the expansion of their
collections. In the case of Carnavalet it may be said that the museum made little
or no paid acquisitions of personal objects, although Parisian sale catalogues
show that there was a very developed market. Richard Wrigley , who has studied
the Revolutionary relic, quite rightly remarked on the relevance of the
assumption made by the organizers of the Muse des Souverains that sufficient
quantities of new material would certainly come into the museum through
private sources, indicating that there was a reservoir of personal souvenirs,
which could be drawn upon (Wrigley , 2002 : 35).
11
Archives concerning donations, such as testaments, show the high esteem in
which their owners held such objects. Many of them had been kept in families for
generations. Such was the case of a slipper donated to the Muse des Souverains
in 1853 supposedly hav ing belonged to Marie-Antoinette. To the owners mind,
its story was well documented, and its authenticity unquestionable : shortly
after the queens execution it had been taken from her chambers by a certain
captain Dorv ille, who immediately gave it to the donors mother. In his own
words it had been religiously conserved in the family ever since (Barbet de
Jouy , 1868 : 186). Later, towards the end of the nineteenth century , donations
came directly from the family members of famous artists or writers, like a
collection of items which had belonged to Jules Michelet and given to the Muse
Carnavalet by his wife in 1893 (Dubois, 1947 : 446) orthe 17 0 personal
belongings donated in 1923 by Georges Sands granddaughter. However, not all
offerings were eagerly accepted, and as might be expected, their authenticity
became a question of ever-greater importance. The increasingly severe
conditions applied in the process of admission, illustrated the curators desire to
justify and to rationalize the presence of these objects.
12
In regard to personal objects, questions of authenticity were not really raised
before the middle of the nineteenth century . When the famous collection of the
former Alexandre de Sommerards Muse de Cluny opened to the public in 1844,
no one expected any explications concerning the provenance of Saint Louis
chess set, Franois Is bed or the knife that had been used to cut the stag at the
gala banquet celebrating Charles VIs coronation. Moreover, the descriptions of
objects on display show no understanding of frontiers between history and
my th ; the chalice that was used at the dinners of Charles V was quite naturally
described as being able to quench the thirst of thirty men.1 2 The objects in his
collection, although chosen for their artistic qualities were not so much
described in aesthetic terms but rather as silent witnesses to important
historical events and sometimes to very intimate scenes. The door to the room
named after Franois I came from the chateau dAnet ; in Sommerards words it
13
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 10/23
had often given way to Henri IIs impulses, as he came to forget his troubles
beside Diane,1 3 his famous mistress. As to the authenticity of the claimed
provenances and despite their sometimes outrageous improbability , the
venerable nature of the Muse de Cluny and the reputation of its founder seem to
have been proof enough (Marot, 1969 : 291).
Under the reign of Napolon III, the museum was asked to satisfy more
rigorous criteria concerning the authenticity of the artifacts it display ed. In the
field of historical research, emphasis was being put more and more on the
essential importance of primary sources (Poulot, 2004 : 199) ; in this changing
disciplinary context there could be no idea of creating a new history museum
following the artistic principle which had been adopted in Louis Philippes
museum dedicated to All the glories of France at Versailles. In these galleries,
French history , battles and coronations were mainly illustrated through a
selection of artworks, a huge state commission had ordered a vast series of
paintings by contemporary artistes such as Vernet or Delacroix to complete the
museums program. What was required now was proof ; a prerequisite that
fuelled the creation of the Muse des Archives de lEmpire, entirely based on the
principle of display ing authentic documents, for the most part dated and
manuscript. This change in attitude concerning authenticity is also illustrated by
the efforts of the curators of the Muse des Souverains, a museum entirely
conceived around the principle of objects hav ing belonged to. In the decree
announcing the creation of the museum, published and signed by Louis-
Napolon in 1852, authenticity was declared the essential condition and
principle of its collections.1 4 milien de Nieuwerkerke, Directeur gnral des
Muses nationaux, was very active in the creation of the museum and with his
colleagues in the Louvre, did not hesitate to refuse large quantities of objects.
The museums archives show that a good deal of the propositions submitted for
consideration by the museums curators corresponded to a very loose
conception of authenticity , especially in the case of the impressive series of
objects pertaining to Napoleon I, in most cases common bibelots simply marked
with his name. Nieuwerkerke knew that if he wanted to be taken seriously he had
to have the means of convincing v isitors of the authenticity of the relics on
display . As Catherine Granger has remarked, the museums catalogue included
extracts of archives to support claims of authenticity , sometimes printing letters
received by donors relating how they came into possession of the objects. One
such letter is from an Austrian officer, Rudolf Fuchs, who explained that his
father had been doctor to the Austrian roy al family and had thus come into
contact with the roi de Rome, giv ing him the opportunity to cut a lock of his hair
after his death. He could thus guarantee the authenticity of the relic in
question(Granger, 2005 : 324). It would appear that curators in general became
increasingly wary . Jules Cousin, the director of the Carnavalet Library and
Museum from 187 0 to 1898, seems to have had little time to spare for what a
colleague of his called la dfroque. In spite of the presence at Carnavalet of a
great deal of such personal possessions, and the importance of certain
donations, he showed his lack of enthusiasm on more than one occasion. When a
member of the Duplessis family offered the relics of Lucile Desmoulins, wife of
the revolutionary hero Camille Desmoulins, including an embroidered corsage,
that had been worn over the beating heart of the faithful lover, he distrustfully
demanded, who can prove it, her breast is no longer.1 5 Of course doubt was
difficult to admit in a space that increasingly defined and legitimized its
14
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 11/23
Experiencing the object, the emotionof history
existence with positiv ist concepts of progress and knowledge. Moreover
authenticity was a value that allowed curators to outweigh the importance, at
least in appearance, of the essentially animist ideas and fetishist reactions that
such objects provoke.
In 1989, an exhibition was dedicated to a Soulier de Marie-Antoinette in
Caens municipal museum.1 6 The catalogue included a remarkable analy sis of the
role of museography in conditioning how we behold such personal objects. The
introductory essay voluntarily opens with a painstaking effort to establish the
authenticity of the slipper, only to conclude that proof is perhaps not so very
important but that it is rather the state of uncertainty that most excites our
imagination and our curiosity , allowing us to invent from what we see (Tapi,
1989). The object, in this case a slipper, is presented with a label stuck to the
inner sole indicating the extreme importance of identification by means of a
written seal. It was most probably affixed when the object was first exhibited in
Caen in 1883. By examining the question of authenticity we can see that the
representational value of these souvenirs rarely resides in the phy sical aspect of
the object itself ; its value is inv isible, only the supplementary information
provided in the most simple case, the mention of its provenance on a label
can bestow any real meaning. This strange situation was most clearly described
by a journalist of the Magasin pittoresque in 1869 : Take away the certificate of
provenance from the handkerchief that Napoleon touched before dy ing, or from
Marie-Antoinettes slipper and we cannot say how much they would be worth,
nor if one would still find a soul who would bend down to pick them up off the
ground.1 7 This implies that museographical strategies play an essential role in
fabricating the meaning of such objects. The Caen exhibition is an intriguing
reflection on how these objects and their display provoke a sense of intellectual
discomfort. The most obv ious explanation for this is that they are quite often
devoid or weak in the v isual, aesthetic, demonstrative or narrative qualities that
generally justify the presence of an artifact in a museum. The observational
paradigm which is still status quo in most museums considers that the object
contains a sum of clearly definable knowledge that can be directly transferred to
the spectator or observer, without there being any interpretative interaction
between them (Taborsky , 1990 : 60). It most obv iously flounders in the face of
such objects, for what are we supposed to learn, understand or appreciate when
we gaze upon Napoleons handkerchief or a slipper once worn by Marie-
Antoinette ?
15
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 12/23
F. Bodenstein 2007.
Photo 3: Napoleons handkerchief and hat. Detail from an engraving representingobjects in the Muse des Souverains. Wood graving by J. Choquet, published in theMuse des familles, August 1854: 345.
How can we define the quality that justifies their presentation to the public,
and how can we define their presence without simply resorting to admitting to
our own fetishist tendencies, for we feel their attraction without fully
understanding or accepting it ? The solution may be found in recent social
theories that place objects or globally material culture at the heart of social
relationships and try to describe the structures that they help to define, allowing
us to consider such objects not just as idiosy ncratic exceptions in a largely
rational and reasonable universe but as extensions of our social selves (Debary ,
Turgeon, 2007 : 2).
16
The object-souvenir is in fact the clearest expression of how the museum
preserves and fabricates memories through experience(s) of history as opposed
to the construction of historical knowledge. In a sense it is exemplary of a
paradox that lies at the heart of the history museum. Critically -minded curators
such as Laurent Gervereau and specialists of nineteenth-century museums like
Dominique Poulot agree that they often evolve far from the considerations of the
historiography of their time, siding with simple concepts of compilation and
conservation and indeed serv ing as witnesses of a relationship with the past,
with memory , with identity rather than as the expression of a relationship to
History as a scientific discipline (Gervereau, 1996 : 22, translated by the
author).1 8 The objects that we have questioned here are not historical
documents in a strict sense, as they prov ide little information in themselves.
They have value because of their past, their provenance, the hands that touched
17
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 13/23
them, the events that they witnessed ; things that they do not necessarily
translate directly are remembered or imagined indiv idually by those that
contemplate them. The emotional potential of these objects is heightened by the
fact that they prov ide little or no other information that might distract the
v isitor from a sentimental experience. They may even be defined by this
discursive void, particularly open to interpretation. The power of personal
objects was recognized by nineteenth-century curators and seems to have
served the secular cult des Grands Hommes, described by Louis Rau as a
replacement religion (Rau, 1959 : 37 2) vowing its cult not to a higher god but
to humanity itself as a transcendent value. The garden created by Lenoir can
thus be interpreted as the material expression of the secularisation of memory
provoked by the changing attitude to death, as analy zed by Jean-Claude Bonnet
in his study of eulogies in the eighteenth century . He puts forward the idea that
the secular orator (we might here use the word curator) adopts the point of
v iew of posterity . [] The former eschatological perspective gives way to an
exclusively commemorative v ision (Bonnet, 1998 : 53, translated by the
author).1 9 The cult of Great Men was also considered as an integral part of civ ic
and moral education. At the end of the nineteenth century , in a chapter of his
ducation des sentiments, entitled Du culte des grands hommes, the
philosopher Flix Thomas wrote our religion is to love and cherish our
patrons, provoking a new form of emulation, whose educational role is
destined to become more and more important[] because humanity progresses
in reality only thanks to men of genius (Thomas, 1899 : 216, 213, translated by
the author).20 Aside from obvious political intentions,21 the fundamental aim of
the Muse des Souverains was to prov ide moral examples and lessons. The
emotion produced at the sight of the objects display ed was a means to this end.
Viel-Castel declared that nothing written could compare to the quiet eloquence
of the relics there assembled, commenting on the strong emotional reaction
shown by v isitors of all generations ; in his account even the y oungest and most
frivolous spirits were touched and women and veterans were often moved to
tears. Towards the end of the century the Muse Carnavalet would also display
the Emperors possessions, promoting historical pathos by presenting
Napoleons ncessaire de campagne, as objects of grave curiosity .22 According
to Viel-Castel, the napoleonic souvenirs needed no introduction ; the history of
this hros populaire was in every ones minds and hearts. Not only did he claim
that they had the power to recall a whole period, he described how the presence
of the Emperors personal objects had incited v isitors to recall their own
forgotten family stories.23 Interestingly one journalist was shocked by the
presence of the handkerchief that had been used to wipe Napoleons brow on his
deathbed considering it to be an object too intimate and moving for display in a
public museum.24 In his inaugural speech of the Muse des Archives de lEmpire,
Lon Gautierannounced that one of the aims of the new museum would be to
help v isitors conceive a higher idea of the French nation, whilst underlining the
importance of the emotional effect produced by the objects on display . He
recalled the strong impact that the souvenirs from Sainte-Hlne had had on the
v isitors of the Muse des Souverains, which had opened fourteen y ears earlier
and imagined the impression that Louis XVIs tearstained testament would make
on the public of his museum.
We can observe how the display of personal objects became less political and
gave rise to more intimate v isions in other museums, especially those
18
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 14/23
Towards a Cultural History of RelicObjects and the Post-ModernMuseum
established from the end of the century onwards in the homes of famous men,
writers and artists such as Victor Hugo and Gustave Moreau although it is a
question of perspective as our more recent examples show that this tendency
seems to have been inversed. In such personal contexts they became objects of
devotion or veneration in a cult which was not so much focused on man as an
historical actor, or a personification of national glory but was in a sense
intensely concerned with Man himself ; great men, generally artists who came to
represent the div ine element in all men or a new conception of genius, which
Hugo himself contributed to developing in his writings (Pety , 2007 : 59).25 We
might conclude that the range of emotional possibilities prov ided by such
objects was and is still particularly large.
Today , artifacts hav ing belonged to still abound in the personal museums of
artistes, writers and famous historical figures, places whose idiosy ncratic
rejection of public museum conventions at once recalls earlier curiosity
cabinets and anticipates post-modern display strategies (MacClellan, 2006 :
xv i). Let us first consider two twentieth-century Parisian examples that
immediately come to mind as efforts to recapture a nineteenth-century
sentiment of objects : the Maison de Balzac and the Muse de la Vie Romantique
respectively opened to the public in 1960 and 1984. They both seek to convey a
sense of the souvenir specific to the romantic era y et they do not simply
provide a lesson in cultural history . A display of objects related to Balzacs
passion for Mme Hanska in the house in which Balzac spent the last y ears of his
life and which was donated to the town in 1949, inv ites us to relive Balzacs
emotion for his lover, letting us contemplate the same keepsakes that he had
himself lov ingly handled. We can discover the so called canne bullition
made from the turquoises of a necklace of Mme Hanska, a watch and a writing set
that he gave her. We can also see Balzacs hand moulded in bronze and the
medallion of Balzac by David dAngers.
19
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 15/23
F. Bodenstein 2007.
Photo 4: Display of Balzac souvenirs of Mme Hanska at the Muse Balzac in Paris.
F. Bodenstein 2007.
Photo 5: A display dedicated to objects that once belonged to Georges Sand, they wereoffered to the Muse Carnavalet in 1923 by her granddaughter, today in the Muse de laVie Romantique, Paris.
The fetishist, emotional element that is necessarily attached to these objects is
one of the most efficient strategies that such museums rely on. At the Muse de
la Vie Romantique, a similar display of objects, formerly to be seen in the Muse
Carnavalet, is dedicated to Georges Sand who with Ary Scheffer has become a
resident me du lieu. Museum catalogues, articles and descriptions of such
objects reveal how the museum consistently uses them to evoke the inner,
sentimental life of historical figures.26
20
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 16/23
Little remains of the history museums considered in this article Lenoirs
gardens have of course disappeared, Sommerards Cluny is unrecognizable and
the Muse des Souverains was shut in 187 1 after the fall of the Second Empire.
Carnavalet has thrived however and continues to display objects that once
belonged to historical figures, from Robespierre to Marie-Antoinette, taking care
however to establish a critical distance by using them to illustrate the cult
phenomenon that once surrounded these personalities rather than actually
perpetuating one, and thus avoiding hagiographic discourses. No phy sical traces
of the Muse des Archives de lEmpire that became the Muse dhistoire de
France are v isible to today s public, however during a recent tour, I was lucky
enough to discover the reserves, usually inaccessible to the passer-by , and the
armoire de fer centrally situated in a room called the Trsor des Chartes.27
There one of the museums curator solemnly opened the spectacular onion-peel
series of iron doors that protect what is in fact the phy sical and sy mbolical heart
of the original museum, carefully extracting the most important elements of an
astonishing collection of historical artifacts and documents. When the museum
first opened in 1867 , they represented something like the founding stones of
Frances history and identity . Out of this veritable tabernacle emerged a pack of
play ing cards owned by Louis XVI, Marie-Antoinettes Gazette des Atours and a
set of rusty key s from the Bastille, but also Frances first Constitution of 17 91,
and Napoleons testament. Bemused by our awed reaction, the curator
immediately and somewhat disdainfully evacuated, what she herself designated
as the fetishist value of certain of these objects, by explaining to us the exact
historic circumstances surrounding each of them. Of course, this flow of precise,
historical information immediately took the my thical edge off our first
impressions, reminding us at the same time that this collection was in itself an
historical object and that today one would certainly select a very different group
of documents as representative of the nations past. The future however is
problematic for the Muse dhistoire de France as today it can hardly afford to
maintain a permanent exhibit and questions its role in relation to recent projects
proposed by the present government for the formation of a totally new Muse
national dhistoire de France. Although the program of this new museum
remains totally undefined rather unclear discussions have called for it to be
situated in the Invalides its aim is in a sense already quite intensely ideological
as the current president, Nicolas Sarkozy has expressed the idea that Frances
History requires stronger representation as it forms a coherent whole which
needs to be narrated as such in order to reinforce national identity .28
21
In looking at these nineteenth-century history museums, we have not so much
analy zed national discourse, as tried to delimit the particular agency and use of
the relic-ty pe objects under discussion. These considerations should help in
giv ing such collections as that of the Muse dhistoire de France the chance to
lead a second life : the greatest challenge is finding a strategy that lets such
objects retain their historical charm, or one may even say aura, whilst
developing the full complexity of their meaning, past and present. An effort
which would indeed contradict any attempt or principal of coherence that one
may be tempted to attain in a history museum.
22
The curator and controversial critique of contemporary museum culture,
Julian Spalding has called for a recognition of the museums poeticpower,
which could become a new element to be considered with Rsens
aforementioned trilogy (and which we qualified as the emotional dimension).
23
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 17/23
There can be no substitute for the experience of seeing with y our own ey es thepaintings of Leonardo da Vinci, the beaks of the finches that gav e Darwin his firstinkling of the theory of ev olution, or the shoes that v ictims of the Holocaust took offbefore they entered the gas chamber. Once seen and felt and, as far as one is able,comprehended, such sights can be unforgettable. Creating such flowers of feeling andunderstanding in the minds of each v isitor is the challenge facing museums in the21 st century (Spalding, 2002 : 9).
Bibliographie
Des DOI sont automatiquement ajouts aux rfrences par Bilbo, l'outil d'annotationbibliographique d'OpenEdition.Les utilisateurs des institutions qui sont abonnes un des programmes freemiumd'OpenEdition peuv ent tlcharger les rfrences bibliographiques pour lequelles Bilboa trouv un DOI.FormatAPAMLAChicago
For Spalding :
We have tried to show however that such an understanding of the museums
mission is not inherently new, and that if we intend to promote the emotional
powers of display , we need to understand the history of such strategies.
24
Personal and indeed national relics need to be understood and felt as such, but
at the same time the v isitor needs to be given new critical tools. If the aim of the
post-modern museum is to priv ilege a new plurality of meanings prov iding the
v isitor with more space as an actor, rather than a passive spectator, then one of
its aims should be to allow the v isitor to better appreciate the relationship
between the history (ies) and the memories that display s of relic ty pe objects
recreate and to reflect upon his own emotional reactions thanks to an
intellectual frame of discourse. Museums in the future will need to promote
doubt with delight. There are good scientific reasons why they should do so,
because there is still a surprising amount that we do not know about the past
(Spalding 2002 : 20).In order for this to take place however the nature of our
relationship with the documents that museums use to construct historical
narrative needs to be more clearly established. This means reconsidering the
power of such objects as the secular relics that we have tried to understand
here. Indeed throughout this article any opposition between religious and
profane has been deliberately avoided, and by using the term relic we have
also implied that the transfer from religious to secular did not necessarily mean
a loss of the sacred. If we consider the quality of the sacred to be that which
transcends daily life and fabricates a sense of social coherence (Tessier, 1994)
than of course the museum very much serves to sanctify the values of secular
society . It becomes clear that secular relics prov ide a material support for this
transcendental process, although it goes without say ing that they represent very
different values to those related to Christian relics. We need to recognize that
they do not prov ide objective, fixed points of reference but that they are
powerful emotional triggers that make the spectator more responsive to the
story being told. It follows that they need to be presented with this in mind as
they serve to construct new lieux de mmoires where the past reintegrates the
present to define such essential ideas as national or European identity .
25
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 18/23
Le serv ice d'export bibliographique est disponible aux institutions qui ont souscrit undes programmes freemium d'OpenEdition.Si v ous souhaitez que v otre institution souscriv e l'un des programmes freemiumd'OpenEdition et bnficie de ses serv ices, criv ez : contact@openedition.org
FormatAPAMLAChicagoLe serv ice d'export bibliographique est disponible aux institutions qui ont souscrit undes programmes freemium d'OpenEdition.Si v ous souhaitez que v otre institution souscriv e l'un des programmes freemiumd'OpenEdition et bnficie de ses serv ices, criv ez : contact@openedition.org
ALEXANDRE, Arsne, 1 903, La Maison de Victor Hugo, Paris, Hachette.
BANN, Stephen, 1 97 8, Historical Text and Historical Object : The Poetics of theMuse de
Cluny , History and Theory, 1 7 , 3 , p. 251 -266.
BARBET DE JOUY, Henry , 1 868, Le Muse des Souverains, Paris, Mourgues frres.
BONNET, Jean-Claude, 1 998, Naissance du panthon, essai sur le culte des grandshommes, Paris, Fay ard.
BRESC-BAUTIER, Genev iv e, 2001 , Denon et Lenoir, ternels riv aux, v ieuxcomplices in Daniela Gallo (ed.), Les Vies de Dominique-Vivant Denon. Actes ducolloque organis au Muse du Louvre par le service culturel du 8 au 11 dcembre 1999,t. 2 , Paris, La Documentation franaise, p. 367 -380.
CIT NATIONALE DE LHISTOIRE DE LIMMIGRATION, 2007 , Dossier de presseouverture de la Cit nationale de lhistoire de limmigration, [online], consulted on March24 th , 2008,
http ://www.histoire-immigration.fr/index.php ?lg =fr&nav =280&flash =0
DEBARY, Octav e, TURGEON, Laurier, 2007 , Introduction : entre objets etmmoires, in Octav e Debary , Laurier Turgeon (eds), Objets et mmoire, Qubec,Presses de lUniv ersit Lav al, p. 1 -1 3 .
DELPIERRE, Madeleine, 1 954, Les souv enirs de Georges Sand , Bulletin du MuseCarnavalet, 2 , p. 24-32.
DUBOIS, Madeleine, 1 947 , Les Origines du Muse Carnavalet : la formation descollections et leur accroissement, 1870-1897 , Mmoire de recherches sous la direction deGaston Brire et Franois Boucher, 4 tomes, Paris, cole du Louv re.
DUNCAN, Carol, 1 995, Civilizing Rituals, Inside Public Art Museums, New-York,Routledge.
GALLET, Michel, MONTGOLFIER, Bernard de, 1 960, Les souv enirs de Voltaire et deRousseau , Bulletin du Muse Carnavalet, nov embre, 2 , p. 1 -6.
GERVEREAU, Laurent, 1 996, Muses et collections dhistoire en France, Paris,Association internationale des muses de France.
GLOVER-LINDSAY, Suzanne, 2000, Mummies and Tombs : Turenne, Napolon, andDeath Ritual , The Art Bulletin, 82, 3 , p. 47 6-502.
GRANGER, Catherine, 2005, LEmpereur et les arts. La liste civile de Napolon III ,Paris, cole des Chartes.
GREENE, Christopher, 1 981 , Alexandre Lenoir and the Muse des monumentsfranais during the French Rev olution , French Historical Studies, 1 2 , 1 , p. 200-222.DOI : 1 0.2307 /28647 7
HASKELL, Francis, 1 993, The Muse des Monuments Franais , in Francis Haskell,History and its Images : Art and Interpretation of the Past, New Hav en, Yale Univ ersityPress, p. 236-251 .
JAMES-SARAZIN, Ariane, 2004, Aux Grands Hommes, la Patrie reconnaissante ,Archives et nations dans lEurope du XIXe sicle. Actes du colloque organis par lcoledes Chartes en 2001, Paris, Bibliothque de lcole des Chartes, p. 21 5-233.
MANIURA, Robert, SHEPHERD, Rupert, 2007 , Presence : The Inherence of thePrototype Within Images and Other Objects, London, Ashgate publishing.
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 19/23
FormatAPAMLAChicagoLe serv ice d'export bibliographique est disponible aux institutions qui ont souscrit undes programmes freemium d'OpenEdition.Si v ous souhaitez que v otre institution souscriv e l'un des programmes freemiumd'OpenEdition et bnficie de ses serv ices, criv ez : contact@openedition.org
McCLELLAN, Andrew, 1 999, Inventing the Louvre : Art, Politics, and the Origins of theModern Museum in Eighteenth-Century Paris, Berkeley , California Univ ersity Press.
McCLELLAN, Andrew, 2006, Art and its Publics, Museum Studies at the Millennium,Oxford, Blackwell publishing.
Muse des archives nationales, documents originaux de lhistoire de France, 1 87 2, Paris,Plon.
MAROT, Pierre, 1 969, Les origines dun muse dAntiquits nationales de laprotection du Palais des Thermes linstitution du Muse de Cluny , Mmoires de laSocit nationale des Antiquaires de France, 9e srie, tome IV, p. 259-327 .
MEYER, Anne-Doris, 2000, Le Muse personnel de la collection prive au musepublic, parcours de lobjet dart en France au XIXe sicle, thse de doctorat soutenu Strasbourg, sous la direction de Roland Recht.
MUSE DE LEUROPE, 2007 , Cest notre histoire : une expo touchante sur lEurope,[online], consulted on September 1 5th , 2008, http ://www.expo-europe.be/
MUSE DE LEUROPE, 2007 , Communiqu de Presse , [online], consulted onSeptember 1 5th , 2008, http ://www.expo-europe.be/fr/site/presse/conference-de-presse.html
ORHAN, Pamuk, 2009, The Museum of Innocence, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
PETY, Dominique, 2007 , Collectionner lhistoire, des Mmoires doutre-tombe LaRecherche du temps perdu , Romantisme, revue du XIXe sicle, 1 36, p. 55-67 .DOI : 1 0.391 7 /rom.1 36.0055
POULOT, Dominique, 1 986, Alexandre Lenoir et les Monuments franais , in PierreNora (ed.), Les Lieux de mmoire, II La Nation, Paris, Gallimard, p. 497 -530.
POULOT, Dominique, 2004, Les muses dhistoire et la conscience nationale ,Archives et nations dans lEurope du XIXe sicle. Actes du colloque organis par lcoledes Chartes en 2001, Paris, Bibliothque de lcole des Chartes, p. 1 86-1 97 .
POULOT, Dominique, 2007 , Une collection de morts historiques in Octav e Debary ,Laurier Turgeon (eds), Objets et mmoire, Qubec, Presses de lUniv ersit Lav al,p. 1 53-1 83.
QUENTON-BAUCHART, Maurice, 1 91 2, Les Muses municipaux, Paris, H. Laurens.
RAU, Louis, 1 959, Les Monuments dtruits de lart franais : histoire du vandalisme,Paris, Hachette.
RSEN, Jrn, 1 988, Fr eine Didaktik historischer Museen , in Jrn Rsen,Wolfgang Ernst (eds), Geschichte sehen, Beitrge zur sthetik historischer Museen,Freiburg, Centaurus, p. 9-21 .
SARKOZY, Nicolas, 2009, Discours de M. le Prsident de la Rpublique : Vux auxacteurs de la Culture , Nmes discours du Mardi 13 janvier 2009, Bibliothquemunicipale de Ly on, [online], consulted on May 5th , 2009,http ://www.pointsdactu.org/article.php3 ?id_article =1 295
SOMMERARD, Alexandre du, 1 834, Notices sur lhtel de Cluny et sur le palais desThermes, Paris, chez lauteur.
SPALDING, Julian, 2002, The Poetic Museum, London/New York, Prestel.
TABORSKY, Edwina, 1 990, The Discursiv e Object , in S. Pearce (ed.), Objects ofKnowledge, London, Athlone Press, p. 50-7 6.
TAPI, Alain, 1 989, Le Soulier de Marie-Antoinette, essai musographique, expositionau Muse des Beaux-Arts de Caen, 6 juillet-1 6 octobre 1 989, Caen, Muse des Beaux-arts.
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 20/23
FormatAPAMLAChicagoLe serv ice d'export bibliographique est disponible aux institutions qui ont souscrit undes programmes freemium d'OpenEdition.Si v ous souhaitez que v otre institution souscriv e l'un des programmes freemiumd'OpenEdition et bnficie de ses serv ices, criv ez : contact@openedition.org
FormatAPAMLAChicagoLe serv ice d'export bibliographique est disponible aux institutions qui ont souscrit undes programmes freemium d'OpenEdition.Si v ous souhaitez que v otre institution souscriv e l'un des programmes freemiumd'OpenEdition et bnficie de ses serv ices, criv ez : contact@openedition.org
Notes
1 It is in fact the former Palais des Colonies built for the Colonial Fair of 1 935,Malraux transformed it into the Muse des Arts africains et ocaniens in 1 960. Itscollections were transferred to the Muse Quai Branly in 2003.
2 Dossier de presse ouverture de la Cit nationale de lhistoire de limmigration, p. 1 0: Leparcours scnographique se prsente comme un dispositif ouv ert, interactif, construitsur des successions dexpriences immersiv es, motionnelles et pdagogiques ;fragments de v ie, de trajectoires, de circulations rev iv ent trav ers des rcits ettmoignages dindiv idus, des installations dimages, de projections, de jeux etdobjets. (translated by the author).
3 Communiqu de Presse : Cest notre histoire : une expo touchante sur lEurope,Nous v oulons v eiller lhistoire de lEurope un public, souv ent jeune, qui, engnral, ne sy intresse gure, ou trs peu, et chez lequel il faut en appeler plus auxmotions, en lui faisant sentir que cette histoire le concerne, quil sagit de lui: de sonpass et de son av enir. (translated by the author).
4 The psy chological relationship between objects, memories and emotions is perhapsev en more directly and consistently explored in Orhan Pamuks The Museum ofInnocence. The nov el is entirely structured around the metaphor of display :throughout the narration, the main protagonist meticulously describes a series ofspecific objects to represent each important stage or ev ent of his own story and torestore some sense of the past.
5 Two definitions of the word relic need to be considered, as prov ided by the OxfordEnglish Dictionary , 2009: 1 . In the Christian Church, esp. the Roman Catholic andOrthodox churches: the phy sical remains (as the body or a part of it) of a saint,marty r, or other deceased holy person, or a thing believ ed to be sanctified by contactwith him or her (such as a personal possession or piece of clothing), preserv ed as anobject of v eneration and often enshrined in some ornate receptacle.; 2 . Somethingkept as a remembrance, souv enir, or memorial; a historical object relating to aparticular person, place, or thing; a memento.
6 Muse des archives nationales, documents originaux de lhistoire de France, 1 87 2,Paris, Plon, p. I:On en doit la cration M. le marquis de Laborde. () Ce muse metsous les y eux de tous un prcieux spcimen des richesses conserv es dans le sanctuaireauquel il sert en quelque sorte de portique.
TESSIER, Robert, 1 994, Dplacements du sacr dans la socit moderne, Qubec,Bellarmin.
THOMAS, P. Flix, 1 899, Lducation des sentiments, Paris, diteur Flix Alcan.DOI : 1 0.2307 /1 41 251 4
VIEL-CASTEL, Horace de, 1 853, Le Muse des souv erains franais , Le Moniteuruniversel, 1 6 fv rier, p. 1 89-1 90.
WRIGLEY, Richard, 2002, The Politics of Appearances, Oxford/New-York, Berg.DOI : 1 0.27 52/97 81 847 88891 4
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 21/23
7 Pierre Ablard (1 07 0-1 1 42) was one of the most famous theologians of his time butis better known for his lov e affair with his beautiful pupil Hlose (1 1 01 -1 1 62). Theirpassion was of short duration and ended tragically as Abelard was castrated by hislov ers uncle. After this both Ablard and Hloise joined holy orders. They spent therest of their liv es apart, but their story became famous through the correspondencethat they kept with each other.
8 Le pav illon du milieu, qui correspond au fameux pav illon de lHorloge, est occupdans toute sa hauteur par la dcoration de la salle Impriale. Ici, sur un fond pourprerouge, ressortent des abeilles sans nombre, et, dans les v oussures du plafond, les aiglesaccompagnent les insignes impriaux et les figures allgoriques quon y remarque.Leffet de cette salle est saisissant, comme celui produit par la v ue dun tombeaucontenant la dpouille dun hros consacr par lhistoire. Le jour, v oil et my strieux,qui lclaire, et les reliques du grand Empereur, qui y sont dposes, forcent unreligieux silence et de profondes mditations. On peut dire maintenant quelEmpereur a deux grands monuments funraires sur les bords de la Seine: lun auxInv alides, o repose son corps; lautre au Louv re, o plane son esprit.
9 Philippe Busoni, 1 853 LI llustration, 5 mars, p. 1 47 : Le plerinage la salle delEmpire comme un de ces reliquaires de la gloire humaine dont les enseignementsne sauraient tre trop mdits (quoted by Granger, 2005: 334).
1 0 Alexandre, 1 903: 1 2 : Puis v ient, reconstitue av ec un soin pieux autant quescrupuleusement exact, la chambre o il steignit, v ritable sanctuaire, o il estimpossible de ne pas ressentir une v iv e et profonde motion.
1 1 ce mme tage, lemplacement du cabinet de trav ail, a t reconstituefidlement la chambre mortuaire de lav enue dEy lau, av ec le lit colonnes de sty leRenaissance dans lequel mourut le pote, la haute table, galement en chne sculpt,sur laquelle il criv ait debout, enfin tout ce qui ornait la pice et qui av ait treligieusement conserv .
1 2 Cluny , Le Grand Larousse du XIXe sicle, quoted by Anne-Doris Mey er, 2000:230 (translated by the author).
1 3 Sommerard, Alexandre du, 1 834: 59: Elle cda souv ent limpulsion de Henri II,v enant oublier prs de Diane les soins de son empire ou plutt lui remettre lesrnes.(translated by the author).
1 4 Decree quoted by Catherine Granger, 2005: 307 . Considrant quil est dun grandintrt pour lart et pour lhistoire de runir dans une seule et mme collection tous lesobjets ay ant appartenu, daprs constatation authentique, aux diffrents souv erainsqui ont rgn sur la France; que ces objets, aujourdhui dissmins dans un grandnombre dtablissement publics, y sont pour la plupart peu dignement placs;considrant, en outre, que le nouv eau muse senrichira encore de dons particuliersque pourront lui faire les possesseurs de semblables objets.
1 5 Georges Montorgueil, Le Temps, 1 925, quoted by Dubois, 1 947 : 434: uncharmant corsage, en toffe brode, o le cur de la tendre et fidle amoureuse av aitbattu; Qui me lassure, la gorge ny est plus! (translated by the author).
1 6 See online v ideo : http://www.ina.fr/art-et-culture/musees-et-expositions/v ideo/CAB89032288/caen-exposition-autour-du-soulier-de-marie-antoinette.fr.html
1 7 Quoted by Granger, 2005: 325 : tez le certificat de prov enance au mouchoir queNapolon Ier a touch au dernier moment de sa v ie, ainsi quau soulier de la reineMarie-Antoinette, nous ne dirons pas quelle sera la v aleur de chacun deux; mais setrouv era-t-il quelquun qui se baissera mme pour les ramasser.
1 8 Gerv ereau, 1 996: 22:En rgle gnrale, malgr leur nom, les muses dhistoiretmoignent dune relation au pass, la mmoire, lidentit, mais pas dune relation lHistoire.
1 9 Bonnet, 1 998: 53: Lorateur lac, qui adopte le point de v ue de la postrit,sav ance ds lors dev ant les tombes comme un juge av erti et scrupuleux de larenomme. Lancienne perspectiv e eschatologique cde alors dev ant une v isionexclusiv ement commmorativ e.
20 Thomas, 1 899: 21 6: Notre religion est daimer et chrir ces patrons.; 21 3: de lune nouv elle forme de lmulation galement fconde, et dont le rle dans lducationdoit dev enir de plus en plus grand. [] cest que lhumanit ne v it en ralit et ne
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 22/23
progresse que par les hommes de gnie.
21 Horace de Viel-Castel, Le Moniteur universel, 1 853, 1 6 fv rier: 1 89-1 90, quoted byGranger, 2005: 1 90: Il est bon de faire rev iv re, pour les hommes daujourdhui, lesnoms de tous les chefs qui ont prsid aux destines de leurs anctres, de les entourerdu prestige clatant des souv enirs, et, pour restaurer le pouv oir quil a t troplongtemps de mode de dnigrer, il faut le relev er, non seulement dans le prsent, maisaussi dans le pass.
22 Lillustration, 21 mai 1 898, Le nouv eau Carnav alet: 37 1 :Plus loin, cest unesalle empire remplie de rares portraits de Napolon Ier, remplie surtout par lessomptueuses pices de son ncessaire de campagne, lgu jadis par le gnralBertrand, et quon a eu pour la premire fois lide de mettre sous les y eux du public.Quelle grav e curiosit v oquent ces menus objets si intimes ! Cette brosse dents demi use qui garde encore la teinte de la poudre; ce flacon av ec ltiquettemanuscrite eau de rose, et cet autre rempli encore au quart deau de Cologne.
23 Horace de Viel-Castel, Le Moniteur universel, 1 853, 1 6 fv rier: 1 89-1 90: Aucuncicerone nav ait besoin de lui raconter lhistoire du hros populaire; elle sortait detoutes les bouches ; elle impressionnait tout ce peuple, dont les pres ont t les soldatsdu grand capitaine. En quelques heures et dev ant ces monuments contemporains deNapolon on aurait pu recueillir des milliers danecdotes indites, traditionshrditaires, que les compagnons du v ainqueur dAusterlitz ont lgues leursenfants, et qui, passant de gnrations en gnrations, prendront place un jour parmiles lgendes merv eilleuses.
24 C. de Chatouv ille, Chronique du mois, Le muse des Souv erains, Muse desfamilles, octobre 1 853, quoted by Granger, 2005: 331 .
25 Pety , 2007 : 59 in reference to Victor Hugos La Lgende des sicles: En dpit dutitre qui fait rsonner la div ersit des sicles prise en charge par la parole potique, leprojet, dans la prface de 1 859, semble moins centr sur lhistoire, principedv olution, que sur lHomme, principe de permanence, grande figure une etmultiple, lugubre et ray onnante, fatale et sacre.
26 Delpierre, 1 954: 30: De ce dplorable mnage qui troubla douloureusement la v iede Nohant, errent quelques souv enirs dans une v itrine de Carnav alet, comme pourremmorer les preuv es familiales de Sand et nous dire que le cur de la terribleSolange av ait aussi souffert.
27 For photos see: http://www.culture.gouv .fr/mcc/Actualites/Actualite-en-images/Les-Archiv es-nationales/%28offset%29/0/%28selected_image%29/3#3
28 Sarkozy , 2009, Discours de M. le Prsident de la Rpublique : Vux aux acteursde la Culture, Nmes Mardi 1 3 janv ier 2009.
Table des illustrations
Crdits F. Bodenstein 2007.
URL http://cm.revues.org/docannexe/image/834/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 528k
Crdits F. Bodenstein 2007.
URL http://cm.revues.org/docannexe/image/834/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 100k
Crdits F. Bodenstein 2007.
URL http://cm.revues.org/docannexe/image/834/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Crdits F. Bodenstein 2007.
URL http://cm.revues.org/docannexe/image/834/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 132k
Crdits F. Bodenstein 2007.
4/14/2014 The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity
http://cm.revues.org/834 23/23
Crdits F. Bodenstein 2007.
URL http://cm.revues.org/docannexe/image/834/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 114k
Pour citer cet article
Rfrence lectronique
Felicity Bodenstein, The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the Secular Relics ofNineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity , Conserveriesmmorielles [En ligne], #9 | 2011, mis en ligne le 15 avril 2011, consult le 14 avril 2014.URL : http://cm.revues.org/834
Auteur
Felicity Bodensteinest doctorante en histoire de lart lUniversit Paris IV-Sorbonne (France) et travaille sur leCabinet des mdailles de la Bib liothque nationale de 1830 1930 sous direction duprofesseur Barthlmy Jobert. Elle a t chercheure associe la Bibliothque nationalede France de 2005 2008, puis fellow au Getty Research Institute Los Angeles en 2009-2010 et est maintenant assistante de recherche sur le projet European National Museums :Identity Politics, the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen lUniversit Paris IPanthon-Sorbonne.
Felicity Bodenstein is a PhD candidate in Art History at the Universit Paris IV-Sorbonne(France). Shes working on the Cabinet des mdailles de la Bib liothque nationale de1830 1930 under the supervison of Professor Barthlmy Jobert. She was researchassociate at the Bibliothque nationale de France between 2005 and 2008, fellow at theGetty Research Institute in Los Angeles in 2009-2010 and is now research assistant on theproject European National Museums : Identity Politics, the Uses of the Past and theEuropean Citizen at the Universit Paris I Panthon-Sorbonne.
Droits dauteur
Conserveries mmorielles